Get email alerts on the Energy Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee defers resolution to create state energy‑pathways task force amid procedure, PUC concerns
Summary
The committee reconsidered House Concurrent Resolution 202, which would form a legislative task force on the state's future energy pathways, but recommended deferring the measure because recent amendments and concerns that PUC participation could be construed as ex parte could not be resolved before the legislative deadline.
Get email alerts on the Energy Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection on April 23 reconvened to reconsider House Concurrent Resolution 202 (house draft 2), which would establish a legislative task force to examine the state's future energy pathways and strategies to maximize cost savings while minimizing risk to ratepayers over the next three decades.
The Chair said the reconsideration followed separate amendments made after the committee's earlier decision and new community testimony raising questions about whether Public Utilities Commission participation in such a convening could be construed as an ex parte contact on matters the PUC might later take up on a docket. The Chair told members she was not permitted, given the legislative deadline and previous committee cycles, to amend the resolution to require the task force chairs to open membership to the public.
"I am not permitted to amend this resolution to require the chairs of this task force to make membership open to everyone in the public," the Chair said. Because the membership requirement could not be changed in the current procedural cycle, and because a similar House resolution was pending, the Chair recommended deferring action on HCR 202; the committee agreed and adjourned pending the House measure.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

