County says IGA gives flexibility; cities warn population split would cut their share by ~$4M
Officials debated whether to fund projects via an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) — which the county said would allow bond financing and flexibility — or via a population‑based distribution, which city representatives said could leave cities about $4 million worse off.
The full story
County staff told attendees that choosing an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) would likely mean issuing bonds but would offer more flexibility to finance level‑one projects; the county said that a population distribution is more restrictive and could change how projects are presented on the ledger.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in