Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council denies variance to reduce lot width and side setbacks on Oak View Drive
Summary
A variance request to split a lot on Oak View Drive into two smaller lots (proposed width 49', 5' side setbacks) failed after council members said the application did not meet the four legal criteria required for a variance.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Springtown’s council acting in a quasi‑judicial capacity denied a variance request to reduce lot width and side setbacks for property on Oak View Drive (Lot 5, Block 4, Spring Branch Acres). The applicant, realtor/developer Anthony Gindo, proposed dividing one lot into two 8,241‑square‑foot lots with 49‑foot widths and 5‑foot side setbacks to allow two single‑family homes.
Council members noted the board of adjustments must apply four legal criteria for a variance and several members said the application did not satisfy those standards — in particular the requirement that the hardship not be self‑imposed and that granting relief be in harmony with the regulations. One council member said the surrounding neighborhood did not contain lots with similar small widths and expressed concern a variance would set an undesirable precedent. The motion to deny the variance carried.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

