Candidates, board members split on micromobility: skepticism of Uber/Lyft subsidies; ADA paratransit obligations noted
Interviewees told the committee they are wary of subsidizing ride‑hail for core service and are cautious about micotransit efficiency; they also noted federally required door‑to‑door paratransit service must be maintained.
The full story
Both candidate Zach and board member Kent expressed skepticism about using Uber and Lyft to substitute for fixed‑route service, particularly for late‑night demand, while acknowledging some microransit models can support access for riders with special needs.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in