House Judiciary Committee advances sweepstakes bill clarifying electronic-gambling exception; Rutherford amendment tabled 14–6
Jan 29, 2026
The committee gave Senate Bill 3 a favorable report after debate over whether sweepstakes-style exceptions allow video-poker and similar electronic gambling devices. Representative Rutherford's amendment to bind magistrate rulings was tabled by a 14-6 vote.
The full story
The House Judiciary Committee advanced Senate Bill 3, the measure lawmakers described in committee as the "sweepstakes bill," after members spent extensive time debating whether statutory sweepstakes exceptions permit electronic gambling devices such as video poker. Mr. Bannister, reporting for the Constitutional Law Subcommittee, told the panel: "The only bill from the constitutional law subcommittee is senate 3, which is known as the sweepstakes bill." The committee voted to give S.3 a favorable report by a vote of 14 to 6.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in →