Debate over changing priorities for demonstration state forests intensifies

Assemblymember Rogers presented AB 24 94 to revise the commercial‑logging mandate on 14 demonstration state forests so that public‑trust values — biodiversity, carbon sequestration, tribal stewardship and recreation — are elevated. Supporters including tribal leaders, environmental nonprofits and conservation groups argued the change better reflects modern climate and biodiversity goals and supports tribal co‑management.

Opponents — including forest researchers, timber industry representatives and several county coalitions — warned the bill could undermine long‑term applied research, sustained‑yield timber production and local mills that rely on timber flows. Researchers said demonstration forests are 0.2% of California forest land yet play an outsized role in applied experiments; proponents said amendments preserve research and allow active management. The committee accepted author and committee amendments, moved the bill to Appropriations with the item on call, and the author committed to continuing stakeholder engagement.