Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Covington I.S.D. board approves election services interlocal, tables intercom replacement and reschedules January meeting

Covington I.S.D. Board · December 8, 2025

Summary

At its Dec. 8 meeting the Covington I.S.D. Board approved an interlocal agreement with the City of Covington for May 2, 2026 election services, unanimously tabled consideration of a new intercom system, and moved the Jan. 12 meeting start time to 6:00 p.m.; motions were unanimous.

The Covington I.S.D. Board on Dec. 8 approved an interlocal government agreement with the City of Covington to provide election services for the May 2, 2026 school board election. The motion to approve the agreement was made by Vice‑President Kevin Ray and seconded by Cody Nickell; all seven board members voted in favor.

At the same meeting the board unanimously tabled consideration of replacing the district’s intercom system after a motion from Joe Reitz, seconded by Secretary Georgia Whittington. The board also voted to change the start time of the regular January meeting (Jan. 12, 2026) to 6:00 p.m.; that motion was made by Georgia Whittington and seconded by Duane Wines and carried on a voice vote.

The meeting record shows the following formal actions and vote tallies: the consent agenda (minutes for Nov. 10 and Nov. 17, 2025; school accounts; monthly bills) was approved (mover: Kevin Ray; seconder: Joe Reitz) with Freedom Jay, Kevin Ray, Georgia Whittington, Cody Nickell, Joe Reitz, Kevin Karlicek and Duane Wines voting yes. The interlocal agreement was approved (mover: Kevin Ray; seconder: Cody Nickell); the intercom replacement was tabled (mover: Joe Reitz; seconder: Georgia Whittington); the January meeting time change was approved (mover: Georgia Whittington; seconder: Duane Wines); and the meeting was adjourned on a motion by Joe Reitz, seconded by Kevin Karlicek. All recorded votes were in favor.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source