Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Naming Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs proposal to shift to three-year staggered terms and broaden naming recommendations

City Facilities Naming Committee · March 19, 2026

Summary

The Facilities Naming Committee heard a staff proposal to change member terms to staggered three-year appointments and to let the committee recommend namings beyond council-charged items, with council retaining final approval.

City staff presented proposed changes to the facilities naming policy on Thursday, including a move from one-year appointments to staggered three-year terms for committee members and expanded authority to make naming recommendations to the city council.

"Right now, everyone is appointed for a 1 year term ... We're going to ask council if you all agree to set those at 3 year terms and we will stagger them," Mr. Mills told the committee. He said officers (chair and vice chair) would remain one-year positions. The policy rewrite staff proposed would also let the committee bring forward naming recommendations without waiting for an explicit council charge, with council maintaining ultimate decision-making power.

Committee members generally supported not "painting ourselves into a corner" by limiting recommendation authority, but several asked that proposed changes be presented to council before taking effect. Mr. Mills said staff would draft the revised policy and bring it to a future council meeting for approval. The committee did not take a formal vote on the policy text at this meeting; staff described these proposals as recommendations to be carried forward to council.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source