Get email alerts on the Meeting Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At-a-glance: key motions and unanimous votes from Spring Green Plan Commission meeting
Summary
At the March 19 meeting the commission approved the agenda and minutes, convened as the Plan Commission, allowed a preliminary CSM consultation, recommended four zoning-code changes (unanimous joint vote), and adjourned at 7:11 p.m.
SPRING GREEN, Wis. — The March 19 meeting of the Spring Green Plan Commission and Joint Extraterritorial Zoning Committee produced several procedural approvals and one substantive recommendation that passed unanimously.
Key actions recorded in the minutes: - Approval of the meeting agenda: Motion by David Saperstein, second by Jason Falteisek; passed with all in attendance in favor. - Approval of the February 19, 2025 meeting minutes: Motion by Brad Hutnik, second by Fred Iausly; passed with all in attendance in favor. - Convened as the Plan Commission at 7:05 p.m.: Motion by David Saperstein, second by Kevin Zimmer; passed. - Preliminary consultation: Saint Vincent DePaul/Noah Anliker presented a proposed Certified Survey Map to join parcel #182-0755-00000 and #182-0756-00000; consensus acceptable, no formal action required. - Zoning amendments recommendation: Motion by Fred Iausly, second by Kevin Zimmer to recommend approval of amendments to Section 3.09.01 and Section 3.19.01 and to remove Table 3.20.06 and Table 3.20.10; joint vote passed with all in attendance in favor (8 yes, 2 absent). - Adjournment at 7:11 p.m.: Motion by Fred Iausly, second by Jason Falteisek; passed with all in attendance in favor.
The minutes record no public comments during the general comment period. Specific proposed amendment language is available for review at the Village Office.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
