Neighbors raise access, water-pressure and tree-loss concerns over Crooks' duplex request

At a Village of Spring Green Plan Commission hearing on April 16, 2025, commissioners considered a conditional use permit request from Darrin and Kimberly Crook to build a two-family detached residence on parcel #182-0688-00000 (Lot 40, Rasmussen Subdivision).

Neighbors questioned whether a duplex is appropriate in the subdivision and raised practical concerns about access and infrastructure. Melissa Anding asked, "If the property is zoned for single family, how is a duplex allowed?" Commissioner Greg Prem and staff member Wendy Crary explained that duplexes are a conditional use in R-1 and R-2 zoning districts and are not a permitted use in the R-3 district, and that conditional uses are governed by State Statute and may be approved with conditions.

Several attendees flagged site-specific impacts. Bill Reinke and Deb Tafs expressed worries about congestion and tree loss; applicant Darrin Crook said "three trees will for sure need to come down" but that final removals depend on construction plans. Neighbor Jerry Anding raised concerns about driveway access and existing low water pressure in the subdivision, and said, "There are better and bigger lots available in other areas for a duplex." Darrin Crook told the commission the duplex would consist of two-bedroom units on slab and that driveway access would most likely be off Rebecca Street.

The commission also clarified enforcement responsibilities for neighborhood covenants and restrictions. Prem told attendees that covenants and restrictions are enforced by the developer or a homeowners association and "cannot be enforced by the Village." Chuck Ruetten noted that the remaining five lots in the subdivision will be developed as single-family homes, and Commissioner Ed Lilla summarized the zoning district requirements for those present.

No formal action on the Crooks' application is recorded in the hearing minutes provided; the record shows discussion and clarification but no vote on the conditional use permit at that meeting. The Plan Commission then proceeded to other business and adjourned at 7:25 p.m.