Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fallsburg board asks applicant for corrected site map before finalizing setback variance
Summary
Board members and staff told the applicant the application lacks sufficient mapping detail — numeric setbacks, building footprints and reference to a neighboring parcel’s granted variance — and asked for a corrected map before a final decision.
Members of the Fallsburg Zoning Board told the applicant they need a corrected site map showing exact setback dimensions, property lines and the footprint or variance extent of the neighboring building before the board can make an informed decision.
Board members repeatedly noted the application packet lacked the building numbers and plotted setbacks needed for review. “I think if you're not comfortable with the map as it stands… I think it's a good idea to get it — that the applicant provide you the correct map,” said a board advisor (Staff member, S5). The board asked that the new map indicate the neighboring parcel and any variance previously granted so members can compare existing and proposed conditions.
The chair and members also asked for square footage and the rear and side setback details; without those specifics staff said the building department cannot complete its checks. The board moved to open the public hearing but left the matter pending while the applicant was given a month to provide corrected materials.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
