Get email alerts on the Election Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board highlights election-security planning after conference concerns
Summary
Board members raised concerns about threats (drones, bomb threats, suspicious substances and potential federal presence) after a security conference; Director Corinne described Buncombe County’s all‑hazards plan, EOC staffing and tabletop exercises ahead of the general election.
Get email alerts on the Election Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board Chair Weinert and members spent a substantial portion of the Aug. 25 Buncombe County Board of Elections meeting discussing election-security takeaways from a recent conference and what the county is doing to prepare.
Board member Sally described security scenarios discussed in conference breakouts — including drones dropping leaflets, bomb threats, suspicious substances, firearms and arson — and asked whether the county’s protocols align with the sheriff’s office and whether federal actors such as ICE or the FBI could appear at polling locations. "I just don't want to gloss over this," Sally said, urging the board to confirm plans and training ahead of the election.
Director Corinne responded that Buncombe County uses an "all-hazards approach" and maintains an internal emergency plan with bomb-threat checklists and other procedures per phase (pre-election, early voting, election day). She said the county coordinates monthly with emergency management and has held preliminary meetings with municipal law enforcement and the county sheriff. "For this election ... we'll have our briefing, which is coming up in September. And then early October, we'll have a tabletop, which will have all of the departments. The board will be invited," Corinne said. She described exercising scenarios with poll workers and department staff and following those events with after-action reviews.
Members asked about contingency contact lists and whether the EOC would be staffed in person on election day; Corinne said the county will have an in‑person Emergency Operations Center to support on-the-ground coordination rather than relying on phone or remote connections. The presentation emphasized preparation and coordination rather than new policy changes; the board did not take a formal vote on additional security measures during this meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

