Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Prescott council approves changes to Chapter 635 removing large-scale solar farms as conditional uses

Prescott City Council · August 10, 2026

Summary

The council voted to adopt Ordinance 05-26, which removes large-scale solar farms as conditional uses in several commercial and industrial districts, adds accessory dwelling units as a conditional use in R-5, and corrects accessory-use language to reference Article X and Section 635-87. The Plan Commission recommended approval 5–0 after a public hearing with no comments.

The Prescott City Council on Aug. 10, 2026, approved Ordinance 05-26 to amend Chapter 635 (Zoning) of the City Code. City Administrator Matt Wolf reviewed the Plan Commission’s recommendations, which remove large-scale solar farms as conditional uses in C‑1 Central Commercial, I‑1 Light Industrial, I‑2 Heavy Industrial and I‑3 Mixed Industrial districts, and add accessory dwelling units as a conditional use in the R‑5 Single‑Family Residential district. The motion to adopt the ordinance (Ruona/Hintz) passed without a negative voice vote.

The Plan Commission held a public hearing on Aug. 3, 2026; no one attended and staff received no written comments, and the commission voted 5–0 to recommend approval. Wolf told the council that the proposed amendments also correct inaccurate accessory-use language in R‑1 through R‑5 by replacing it with: 'Accessory Uses and Structures – In accordance with Article X,' pointing to Section 635‑87 in Article X, which governs accessory uses and structures. Mayor Gerke presided over the vote; the ordinance will take effect according to the city’s usual ordinance-adoption procedures.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source