Committee identifies wastewater capacity as constraint, backs redundancy options
Committee members warned that a single wastewater crossing beneath the river limits growth and discussed alternatives including a second line, a crossing tied to a future footbridge, or full replacement of the existing crossing; members expressed support for redundancy-focused options.
The full story
Committee members raised wastewater capacity as a significant constraint on future growth and reviewed three alternatives: building a second wastewater line beneath the river, installing a wastewater crossing tied to a planned footbridge, or replacing the existing river crossing line. Members noted the vulnerability of relying on a single crossing and said options that add redundancy are preferable.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in