Get email alerts on the Variance VAR 148 26 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan commission finds VAR #148-26 failed on multiple findings
Summary
Attorney Mark Frantz read board tallies showing VAR #148-26 failed on Findings 2, 4 and 5; the board recorded mixed votes across the five required findings and did not approve the variance.
The Miami County Office of Plan Commission recorded a failure on variance application VAR #148-26 after the board's findings did not receive the required support, the commission reported.
Attorney Mark Frantz read the ballots on the five required findings and reported the recorded tallies. "Finding 1: 4 agree, I disagree," the tally record shows, followed by "Finding 2: 2 agree, 3 disagree," "Finding 3: 3 agree, 2 disagree," "Finding 4: 0 agree, 5 disagree," and "Finding 5: 1 agree, 4 disagree." Those results meant the variance did not carry on several required findings and therefore was not approved.
The meeting record does not specify additional details about the applicant or the property for VAR #148-26 in the provided transcript excerpts. The commission moved on to the next agenda item after the tallies were recorded.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
