Panel supports changing ‘split zoning’ rule so applicants pick a single code for projects
Staff proposed deleting a sentence that forced adjacent properties into a different zone; members agreed the change reduces split-zone confusion and recommended clarifying language before sending the package to the city attorney.
The full story
Staff described a proposed fix to the draft development code’s split‑zoning language so applicants would select a single district at project start rather than being bound by adjacent zoning lines. The staff memo explained the change would keep the requirement to choose one district but remove text that effectively forced an adjacent parcel to the T5 UC standard.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in