Get email alerts on the Constitutional Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances framework for a constitutional convention and authorizes off‑season study
Summary
Lawmakers advanced HB 244, which sets delegate and ratification thresholds for a possible constitutional convention, and debated HB 4, which would direct House and Senate governmental affairs committees to meet off‑season to consider convention logistics; HB 244 will go to the floor, HB 4 remained in committee after a roll call.
Get email alerts on the Constitutional Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Green outlined HB 244 to establish rules if the legislature ever calls a constitutional convention: cap delegates at 144, elect delegates from house and senate districts, require a 0.667 delegate threshold to send proposals to voters, and demand ratification by a majority of voters plus approval in at least 0.75 of parishes. He said the design aims to protect minority and regional interests and ‘‘put the guardrails on the convention itself.’’
Senators questioned whether the 0.75 parish ratification requirement would be too difficult to meet; Senator Miller noted it could let more populous areas win majority support while small parishes block proposals. A public commenter argued voters have repeatedly rejected amendment proposals and urged a convention. After debate a motion to report HB 244 favorably was made, Senator Miller objected, a roll call was held and the ayes carried; the bill will move to the Senate floor. Separately Representative Dixon McMakin’s amended HB 4—designed to require HGA and SGA committees to meet off‑season to develop convention mechanics—was discussed; a motion to report HB 4 failed on a roll call and the bill will remain in committee.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
