Get email alerts on the Curb Appeal 11th Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant asks RDA for more time on 11th Street curb-appeal project; attorney says prior extension expired
Summary
An 11th Street curb-appeal grant recipient asked the Redevelopment Agency for another extension after incomplete contractor work; agency counsel said the previously granted extension expired July 1 and advised the applicant to submit a new HIP application if seeking funding.
Get email alerts on the Curb Appeal 11th Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
An applicant for the RDA's curb-appeal grant for an 11th Street property appeared at the meeting to ask whether the board would allow another extension after contractor delays.
"I spoke with Jeff Nices. He encouraged me to come and see you guys about, and he actually kinda made it sound like there was other funding other than the curb appeal," the applicant said, adding that the contractor "seems to be making progress, but at the same time, not as much as I'd like to see." Administrator Wendy outlined two options: amend the original curb-appeal agreement (which would avoid a new application) or require the applicant to apply for the HIP program as a new grant application.
Attorney Bardoff advised the board that the prior extension — granted through July 1 — has expired. "I don't think we can extend something that's already has expired," he said, recommending the applicant pursue a new HIP application if she wants to seek funding under that program. Members asked staff to have Jeff reconnect with the applicant to determine HIP eligibility and to return with an update for the October meeting. One member said they would review a formal HIP application only if it was submitted and with Jeff present for consideration.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
