Board debates optional student representative policy, asks staff for examples and timing

The board discussed an OSBA‑provided optional policy to add a nonvoting student representative to the board. S3 said the policy clarifies selection and participation rules and that some districts use an application and interview process. While several trustees praised the idea of student voice, others raised concerns about extra paperwork, potential overlap with existing ASB roles, and whether the role would expose students to adult topics mid‑school‑year.

Trustees asked staff to research administrative regulations and examples from other districts (including North Clackamas and others) and to consult high school leadership and leadership teachers before a future reading. The board signaled willingness to consider the policy but indicated it would likely be delayed until a more suitable time (e.g., not mid‑school‑year) and asked staff to return findings for discussion.