Defense Tells Guam Supreme Court Warrant Ruling Was Inconsistent and Should Void Conviction
Defense told the Guam Supreme Court that the magistrate's probable-cause finding, which relied in part on a controlled buy later dismissed, cannot sustain the search warrant as applied and that an inconsistent trial-court review suggests clear and manifest error. The People urged deference and said hearsay may support probable cause under the totality-of-the-circumstances test.
The full story
At oral argument, defense counsel argued the search-warrant affidavit relied on a controlled buy that the government later dismissed to protect an informant and that the trial judge improperly used evidence from the dismissed count in reviewing the magistrate's determination. Defense urged that the trial court’s inconsistent findings suggest clear and manifest error that undermines confidence in the verdict.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in