Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Transportation Trails topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews revised Bass Reeves legacy loop scope after re‑estimate shows major cost growth

Fort Smith Board of Directors · June 9, 2026

Summary

Parks Director Sarah Duuster told the board a consultant reestimate raised the project's cost toward $41 million; staff proposed a revised spine‑style scope estimated at about $29 million and asked for direction to begin procurement while using park sales‑tax CIP funds to cover an identified local gap.

Parks Director Dr. Sarah Duuster updated the board on a federal RAISE/BUI LD grant award for the Bass Reeves legacy loop and presented a revised, lower‑risk scope after a consultant reestimate identified substantial cost growth. "We did receive notification in January 10 that the project was awarded funding just under $25,000,000," she said, and later explained that a full engineering reestimate increased the original opinion of probable cost by roughly $8.4 million and produced a revised total near $41,000,000 for the original route.

To reduce risk, staff described a smaller revised scope that creates a spine down Old Greenwood Road, reduces paved miles, eliminates railroad crossings and lowers the city’s matching obligation to about $29 million total estimated cost. Duuster said the city could apply existing parks 1¢ sales‑and‑use tax CIP funds — about $4.4 million already allocated for trails and greenways — toward the local share but that the project would still leave a funding gap staff recommended addressing with a formal procurement plan for environmental studies, acquisition, consulting and grant administration. She asked the board for consensus to begin the procurement process (6–8 weeks) but emphasized the board would not be committing to final acceptance of the grant at this stage.

Directors discussed pedestrian crossing options for Rogers Avenue (overhead alternatives were raised), federal deadline and obligation risks (staff cited an obligation date of 09/30/2030), and the potential legal and financial consequence if the city accepted funds and failed to complete the work. Staff and the city’s grants adviser said many other cities face similar timing and price‑escalation pressures and recommended proceeding with the revised scope while continuing FHWA coordination and bringing back draft grant language and procurement proposals for board review.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source