Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts five‑year consolidated plan and budgets for CDBG and HOME programs
Summary
The board approved the city’s five‑year consolidated plan (2026–2030) and the current CDBG/HOME budgets for submission to HUD. Public comment urged more infrastructure spending in low‑income areas; staff said CDBG funds can be used for infrastructure in qualified LMI areas and described CAPER reporting for program outcomes.
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fort Smith Board of Directors approved the five‑year consolidated plan and associated program budgets for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME funds and authorized submission to HUD.
Candace Gubuchi, director of community development, told the board the department began the planning process in October 2025 to gather resident input and develop a funding blueprint for housing and public services. Public commenters asked the city to prioritize infrastructure projects in low‑income areas — particularly drainage and sewer work — rather than concentrating funds with a single provider. "I'd personally like to see these funds used for infrastructure and low income areas," Crystal Cadelli said.
Gubuchi said CDBG funds are eligible for infrastructure in low‑income areas and explained that the CAPER reporting process tracks how many clients agencies served; she acknowledged the city does not currently follow individual homeless clients longitudinally but is working with the continuum of care to improve outcome tracking. The resolution passed (5 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention). Staff noted constrained federal funding could change future allocations and recommended citizen input be considered when prioritizing projects.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
