Get email alerts on the Scoring Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
How Hillsborough County’s evaluation committee scored proposals for RFP 2600332
Summary
The evaluation committee used a round‑robin, consensus scoring method, recording per‑criterion scores for five proposals. The procurement recorder will verify the consensus scores with the committee chair before publishing final rankings.
Get email alerts on the Scoring Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During an Aug. 27 meeting, the evaluation committee for Hillsborough County’s procurement office described the scoring method it used to evaluate five proposals in response to RFP 2600332. Chair Ms. Willett said the scoring would proceed in alphabetical order and that members would provide scores in a round‑robin; discussion would occur only when members lacked a clear consensus.
Committee members assigned per‑criterion points (several criteria allowed up to 3 points per subitem) and discussed evidence such as prior project lists, timeliness of reporting, and monitoring/compliance history when deciding scores. Julian De Onnes, a senior buyer, told the group he would verify the recorded consensus scores with the chair and provide a final ranking once verification is complete. The committee also reiterated that procurement communication restrictions related to the solicitation remain in effect for five business days.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

