Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local builders urge council to reject mandatory stretch code during first reading
Summary
During first reading of an ordinance to adopt the 2024 ICC codes (item I-11), multiple builders and industry representatives told the council the proposed Illinois stretch code would raise new-home costs substantially — individual builders cited increases in the tens of thousands of dollars — and urged that the stretch code remain optional.
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Item I-11 — a first reading of an ordinance adopting the 2024 International Code Council codes with proposed local amendments — drew multiple builders and contractor testimonies during public comment. Cort Earhart, president of Earhart Construction, told the council he and other local builders conducted energy-rater analyses and cited an example with an estimated incremental cost of $21,612.86 under a prescriptive stretch-code approach. "The cost for these changes... I was $21,612.86," Earhart said, arguing that the annual energy-dollar savings would not justify the upfront increase.
Chad Meese, vice president of the Northern Illinois Home Builders Association, echoed the concern that mandatory adoption would raise construction costs, add paperwork and inspection burdens, and reduce feasibility for marginal developments. Builders urged staff and council to continue stakeholder consultation and to treat the stretch code as an option rather than a mandatory requirement. The item was heard as a first reading; council members indicated the ordinance will be returned for further consideration at the Feb. 17 meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
