Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Perkasie panel backs chicken-keeping changes, asks for clearer definitions and waste rules

Perkasie Planning Commission · May 28, 2025

Summary

The Planning Commission recommended the Keep of Fowl ordinance amendments to Borough Council with conditions to clarify definitions (excluding male chickens) and to add waste disposal requirements; the motion passed with one commissioner opposed.

The Perkasie Planning Commission recommended sending amendments to the town's Keep of Fowl ordinance to Borough Council after commissioners raised questions about enforcement, waste removal and species definitions.

Commissioner Dave Weaver asked whether construction-material requirements in the draft could be enforced, and Borough Zoning Officer Cassandra L. Grillo said they could. Assistant Borough Manager Linda J. Reid noted that "the ordinance requires chicken coops to be kept clean, dry, and odor-free," but the draft does not currently require a formal waste-removal plan; she said such a plan could be added. Commissioner Quinten Baker asked for clearer definitions of "rooster" and "male chicken."

The Commission voted to recommend the amendments to Borough Council with two conditions: the Borough Solicitor should clarify the definitions section to explicitly exclude male chickens, and the draft should add a provision setting waste-disposal and removal requirements. Mairi Schuler moved the recommendation and Heather Nunn seconded; the motion passed with Kelly Laustsen recorded as opposed. The recommendation will go to Borough Council for consideration, as noted by staff.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source