Get email alerts on the Traffic Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After failed brightness test, River Ridge Board declines further spending on stop signs
Summary
AV‑Tech could not control stop‑sign brightness; with $9,280 already spent ($2,320 per sign), the Board elected not to buy new timed signs and removed the issue from future agendas.
Operations Manager Shane Willis reported AV‑Tech's experiment to control stop sign brightness was unsuccessful, and the vendor declined to modify the stop signs. Willis said the district has spent $9,280 to date for four stop signs, or $2,320 per sign, as reflected in the unaudited financial statements.
Given AV‑Tech's refusal to modify the lights, the Board discussed options — leave the signs as‑installed and manage lighting as needed or purchase signs with timers — and chose not to expend additional funds. The Board directed that the item be removed from future agendas.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
