Guam Supreme Court Hears Argument Over Whether Title 10 Requires Proof a Gun Is Operable
In oral argument in CRA25-012, defense counsel asked the court to require the government to verify a weapon's operability when feasible; the appellee argued existing precedent (People v. Tennyson) makes operability unnecessary for Title 10 offenses. The court took the case under advisement.
The full story
The Supreme Court of Guam heard argument in CRA25-012 over whether the statutory definition of "firearm" under Title 10 requires the government to prove an item was operable at the time of possession.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in