Board backs simpler tree‑count formula and clearer buffer table in LDC amendment

The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of LDC 26‑001 on May 19, a set of clarifying changes to the land‑development code intended to simplify landscaping calculations and resolve a contradiction in the buffer table.

Planner Drew Pearson said the proposed revision replaces a multi‑step fractional tree‑count method with a simpler formula — one tree for the first 3,000 square feet, two trees for the next range, and so on — and places an upper cap of 15 trees so very large lots do not trigger excessive planting requirements. "So what we wanna do is simplify that," Pearson said, noting staff ran the math to keep aggregate tree requirements equivalent to the existing formula while making it easier for the public and designers to calculate requirements.

Pearson also presented a revised buffer table that clarifies which column denotes the proposed use versus the adjacent use and removes a conflicting provision that appeared to require single‑family homeowners to install buffers in addition to their lot trees. He said county practice has not required extra buffering on individual single‑family lots and the amendment resolves the code inconsistency.

Board members asked for explanation of what counts as a buffer and about outreach to builders; staff said they meet regularly with builder groups and had reviewed the changes with development stakeholders. Member Valente moved to recommend approval of LDC 26‑001; the motion passed by recorded vote with six yeses and no nays.