Commission debates when projects should require professional plans and DRB review
Members debated numeric triggers — including 20,000 sq ft of disturbed land, 10,000 sq ft of new impervious surface, and newly created slopes of 20–35% — that would require a professionally designed plan and DRB review; commissioners disagreed on whether many slope cases should remain administrative.
The full story
A central question at the Sept. 2 Richmond Planning Commission meeting was which projects should require both a professionally designed site plan and review by the Development Review Board.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in