Commissioners debate Chapter 162 code‑enforcement ordinance and magistrate model
Attorney explained Chapter 162 options — magistrate or citizen board — including complaint-driven enforcement, the potential to impose liens, and enforcement priority lists; commissioners expressed support for building the framework but voiced concern about liens and aggressive enforcement.
The full story
The board spent significant time on June 15 discussing an ordinance to adopt Chapter 162 code‑enforcement procedures, which would create either a magistrate process or a citizen code‑enforcement board for quasi‑judicial hearings.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in