Resident urges board to end Flock camera contract, citing privacy and misidentification risks
Summary
At the town-hall portion, resident Scott Bracken urged the board to end its contract with Flock, saying the cameras record vehicle occupants and have produced misidentifications; he also urged support for two cannabis dispensaries the board is considering.
Scott Bracken, who identified himself as a resident at 235 North Porto, told the board he opposed the village’s contract with the Flock automated license-plate-camera system and urged officials to end it and remove cameras.
Bracken said the cameras “are not only taking pictures of license plates, but they are also taking pictures of the occupants in the car, including your children and my children,” and accused the police department of misleading the public about the system’s capabilities. “They are lying,” he said. He cited a recent Rhode Island case in which a photographed driver was misidentified and sued, and he said the devices cost “about $3,500 a pop” and appear tied to an approximately “$21,000 a year” contract. He also said his December FOIA showed nine cameras installed at that time and asked the board to release records about who has accessed the data.
In addition to opposing the cameras, Bracken told trustees he supported two cannabis dispensaries on the agenda and urged the board to approve them. He contrasted regulation of marijuana with the ready availability of alcohol in the community and said concerns about dispensaries should be weighed against revenue and consistency with local policy. The board did not take formal action on the Flock contract during this meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

