Supervisors press for project-level costs and long-term operating impacts before supporting conservation bond
Several supervisors said Aug. 24 they supported placing the conservation bond on the ballot for voters but expressed concern about a lack of dollar amounts for listed projects and asked how added facilities would be sustained operationally; the conservation board said capital bonds are not intended to cover ongoing operating costs.
The full story
At a special meeting Aug. 24, supervisors signaled support for allowing voters to decide the conservation bond but pressed the conservation board for more detailed project-cost information and clarity about ongoing operating costs.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in