Committee leans toward a five-year master plan with flexibility for inactivity
Staff recommended defining the institutional master plan as a five-year document with a provision allowing an unchanged plan to remain effective for up to 10 years if no development occurs; members suggested annual check-ins and public updates to avoid 'dots on the map.'
The full story
Staff member said the preferred interpretation is that the master plan be a five-year document but allowed flexibility to let an unchanged plan remain in effect until replaced — up to 10 years — if no development is proposed.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
or
Free account
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in