Committee debates RD1–RD4 restricted-development districts; proposed RD amendments fail
Staff presented four restricted-development (RD) districts with tailored limitations for shoreland and wetland areas. Committee members fought over definitions, water-dependent uses, and an amendment limiting RD4 expansion to an extra 1,000 square feet; the amendment received only three votes and the omnibus RD package did not pass.
The full story
Planning staff proposed four Restricted Development (RD) districts to clarify no-build and limited-use areas inside the institutional zone, including an RD1 shoreland resource district with a 250-foot buffer and strict limits on new structures.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in