Audit: review and editorial audit findings

I audited the draft articles against the meeting minutes and the Issues Rules checklist. Major findings: (1) The transcript contains an invalid date, '04/31/2026', in the Taunton Superior Court invoice line; April 31 does not exist. I corrected the date in the articles to April 30, 2026 and flagged the original transcription as an item for facilities/accounting to confirm. (2) The minutes list the MIIA premium as $484,864.16 in the motion text but show $484,834.16 in a vendor/account line; the articles note this $30 discrepancy and recommend confirmation before payment. (3) The signature block at the end of the minutes is garbled; I preserved the recorded roll calls and did not infer additional names.

Other audits: spelling (garbled signature) and agency clarity (BCAHS abbreviated without expansion) were noted and corrected or flagged for follow-up. No misattributions of speakers were found: motions and seconds were attributed to commissioners exactly as recorded. The articles were revised to avoid implying facts not in the minutes and to correct the transcript date error where it is clearly a transcription artifact.