Division 1 Court of Appeals

Other Court · September 11, 2026

0:00/23m

23:18

0:00

5:00

10:00

15:00

20:00

23:18

Case called: Hillius v. 18 Paradise, LLP

Presentation

0:00 → 0:37(38s)

Court clerk or panel announced the third case on the calendar as Hillius v. 18 Paradise, LLP and called counsel forward. The matter was presented for argument to the panel.

Keywords:

Speakers:

Oral argument in Hillius v. 18 Paradise, LLP focused on whether the Consumer Protection Acts statutory provisions (RCW 19.86.093) alter the common-law Hangman Ridge public-interest test and on whether plaintiffs may obtain monetary relief after a declaratory judgment; the panel also discussed homeowners-association and common-open-space issues under the Linden Municipal Code.

AI-Generated Content

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

No transcript available.