Citizen Portal
Sign in
Front PageNationalFollowingFavorites
Saturday, November 14, 2026
California / Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County

OverviewMeetingsDataOfficials
Population
1,902,0472024
Higher than communities in California
Household income
$164,2812024
More favorable than communities in California
Home value
$1.5 million2024
More favorable than communities in California
Unemployment
4.3%2026
More favorable than communities in California
Violent crime
4312023
Similar to communities in California
Work from home
23.9%2024
Higher than communities in California
Source: Polco GPAL, using data from the original source shown for each indicator.Data from Polco

Meetings

Loading meetings…

Santa Clara County, Calif.

Open map →
California · Census county shapes

Quick actions

Santa Clara County officials

All officials →

Hot topics in Santa Clara County

  1. 1 Flock Safety Cameras
  2. 2 Data Center Development
  3. 3 Short-Term Rental Rules
  4. 4 Property Tax Rates
  5. 5 Homeless Encampments
See more →
Citizen Portal
See government, clearly.
Platform
About usFor citiesTopicsNewsDiminished Fourth Estate
Support
Help center
Community
Affiliate programSupport CPVolunteer
Legal
PrivacyTerms
Find your state
ALAKARAZCACOCTDEDCFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMAMDMEMIMNMOMSMTNENHNJNMNVNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVAVTWAWIWVWYPRGUASVI
© 2026 Citizen Portal. Meeting records and summaries sourced from the public record.
49°F (9°C)
Patchy fog · H 62° L 44°
20 meetings
3
Nov

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors November 2, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Monday's Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors meeting (ceremonial items and proclamations) featured employee awards, multiple proclamations (Sikh American Awareness, Diabetes Awareness, Native American Heritage Month), retirements and community recognitions. The meeting was adjourned to reconvene Tuesday, Nov. 3 at 9:30 a.m.

Discussion Points

  • •Colleagues emphasized his role during emergency public health enforcement.
  • •Community speakers urged continued county support and reporting of hate incidents.
  • •Multiple employees and teams were recognized for service across library, public safety, health, roads, and communications.
  • •Owens’ appointment as chamber president and her priorities for internships, access to capital and digital modernization.
  • •Prevalence figures cited (9% diagnosed, 22% prediabetes) and strategic plan findings on disparities.
  • •Procedural approval of ceremonial items to be presented later in the meeting.
  • •Proclamation recognizes Sikh American Awareness Month and highlights community contributions (polling locations, food drives) and reports of targeted harassment.
  • •Public health called for broader prevention measures addressing social determinants.
  • •Rossi’s career accomplishments across County Counsel teams and his leadership of the community protection team were described.

Decisions

  • •Ceremonial commendation; no county commitments recorded.
  • •Ceremonial proclamation; no new funding or programmatic directives recorded in the transcript.
  • •Ceremonial proclamation; no policy action recorded.
  • •Ceremonial recognitions; no follow-up directives recorded.
  • •Ceremonial retirement recognition; no board action recorded.
  • •Motion to approve item 7 carried with four ayes; Vice President Arenas absent.
2
Nov

County of Santa Clara Health and Hospital Committee November 6, 2026 10:00 a.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Health and Hospital Committee meeting of Santa Clara County on Nov. 6, 2026 covered public comment alleging child-welfare failures, a seismic-compliance update for county hospitals, Valley Health Plan member transitions after Optum's exit, the Alcove Palo Alto transition to a community partner, EMS clinical expansions, and federal/state policy and funding outlook.

Discussion Points

  • •Alcove remained open through transition; contracts and data agreements with Stanford and clinical partners are in progress
  • •Appropriations process and continuing resolution through Dec. 11 were discussed
  • •Behavioral health pavilion opened to patients on Nov. 3
  • •Buprenorphine to be used in prehospital setting with a COWS score
  • •De Anza mobile unit had 39 patients through September; De Anza ~15 encounters/month
  • •Guidance for earmark requests expected in February; due dates in March–April
  • •Lease‑revenue bond approved to fund projects; state review/certification is a bottleneck
  • •Multiple one‑time funders contributed to year one revenue
  • •New Congress will have many new members and staff; committee leadership changes may alter priorities
  • •Optum exit affected ~8,500 members; ~2,100 moved to existing PCPs; outreach conducted
  • •Paramedics authorized to monitor transfusions started at non‑trauma centers
  • •Public health warned of early flu season and encouraged vaccinations
  • •Staffing nearly complete; psychiatry expected to start in December
  • •Staff turnover delayed reporting to state; county submitted amended compliance reports
  • •State‑provided leave‑behind naloxone kits to be distributed to bystanders
  • •Supervisors requested member‑experience surveys and Medi‑Cal‑specific data
  • •Two compliance pathways for seismic program; some projects will not meet 2030
  • •VHP does not hold Medi‑Cal Optum contracts; Medi‑Cal members moved to Santa Clara Family Health Plan

Decisions

  • •Committee accepted the report and requested follow‑up
  • •Committee received reports and approved votes on items 7 and 8
  • •Committee received the report
  • •Committee received the report and approved by motion
  • •Committee received the update and approved the report

Directions

  • •Administration and Alum Rock to return with a full‑year update and metrics
  • •Administration to return with streamlining recommendations and more detailed project status in next operational report
  • •Continue to monitor mobile clinic utilization and publicize clinic availability; track vaccination outreach metrics
  • •County to prepare project concepts and begin vetting earmark candidates
  • •EMS to engage with dispatch and fire partners; provide quarterly digitalization update
  • •VHP to return with a separate Medi‑Cal/Optum West transition report and to add survey questions
14
Oct

County of Santa Clara Finance and Government Operations Committee October 13, 2026 2:00 p.m

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Finance & Government Operations Committee reviewed the 2027 legislative platform and a set of departmental reports, received updates on employee development and county food-service planning, discussed data and metrics for the children's budget, heard public commenters raise concerns about child-welfare oversight, and approved routine consent items.

Discussion Points

  • •Clarification on which bill ideas will be recommended to board
  • •Facility and volume constraints (lower occupancy, telework, off-site public services)
  • •IGR outlined vetting process, timeline, partnership strategy and recent budget wins
  • •Interest in reentry culinary program and worker-owned co-op models
  • •Large employee participation in trainings; internal fill-rate target discussed
  • •Need for career ladders, job families, and easier pathways from temporary to permanent status
  • •Population-level indicators are useful but hard to link directly to program impact
  • •Public commenters alleged failures in child-welfare responses; staff noted confidentiality constraints
  • •Questions on outreach to new legislators and engagement strategy
  • •Supervisors want a narrow set of program-level measures (examples discussed: childcare seats, vaccination rates)

Decisions

  • •Committee voted to receive report and requested follow-up metrics
  • •Committee voted to receive the ESA report
  • •Committee voted to receive the report and forward to the board
  • •Committee voted to receive the report and support the RFI approach

Directions

  • •ESA to return with metrics and implementation steps
  • •IGR to refine recommended platform and bring final recommendations to full board in early November
  • •Office of Children and Families Policy to lead metric development and return in January
  • •Proceed with an RFI to gather possible models and partners
10
Oct

County of Santa Clara Housing, Land Use, Environment, & Transportation Committee October 9, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara Countys Hewlett Housing, Land Use, Environment and Transportation Committee met in October to review the countys legislative platform for the coming session, receive the 2025 crop report, and review supportive-housing system reports; the committee approved the IGR report, the crop report, and the supportive housing report.

Discussion Points

  • •How reentry clients are tracked (self-reporting at intake; data matching limited by sharing agreements); partners supplement data.
  • •IGR outlined recent budget advocacy and bill-tracking accomplishments; committee asked for clarification on handling AB1621 and RHNA strategy.
  • •Inspection and weights-and-measures activity including plant shipment interceptions and device testing.
  • •Measure A production totals changed after including additional low-income units in the count.
  • •Parks grazing partnerships and events; roads paving season ending and El Camino/Page Mill improvement; plannings ag advisory kickoff; SIPA social-media outreach success.
  • •Risk of denied applications if only one formal review allowed by state law; need for early expert input and clearer applicant guidance.
  • •Total crop value for 2025 ($347.4M) and drivers (input costs, weather and markets).

Decisions

  • •Report accepted; staff to prepare follow-up and keep committee informed.
  • •Report accepted; staff to return with further breakdowns.
  • •Report received and filed.

Directions

  • •Staff to continue outreach, monitor commodity shifts and seek alternate sources for forest-product data.
  • •Staff to continue outreach to potential legislative authors and regional partners; consider pilot outreach/workshops for applicants in light of AB1621 deadlines.
  • •Staff to examine returns-to-homelessness at multiple timeframes and provide disaggregated reasons for return where data allow.
  • •Staff to explore pre-submittal consultations, pilot workshops and customer communication strategies to reduce resubmissions.
6
Oct

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors October 6, 2026 9:30 a.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors met Oct. 6, 2026. The board heard multiple proclamations, approved consent items, adopted fee increases for animal services, authorized lease revenue bonds for hospital capital projects, approved a referral to study worker-owned cooperatives, and reviewed the county's child welfare system improvement plan.

Discussion Points

  • •Board allowed extensive public comment (many supportive 30-second remarks).
  • •Board discussed constraints on lease revenue bonds (assets to pledge) and broader capital funding needs, including a potential general obligation bond.
  • •Proclamations recognize organizations and encourage prevention and screening.
  • •Public commenters and supervisors flagged persistent gaps in prevention, placement stability, workforce retention, and timeliness of safety assessments (completion within 48 hours).
  • •Referral will inventory county tools and barriers to cooperative growth.
  • •Speakers highlighted local programs and survivor stories.
  • •Staff confirmed projects are in the existing CIP and not new capital projects.
  • •Staff presented fee changes and mitigation options including waivers and billing agreements.
  • •Supervisors emphasized outreach to advertise waiver program and fundraising to minimize barriers.
  • •Supervisors requested disaggregated demographic reporting for Latino subgroups and Black/African-ancestry populations, verification of percentage calculations in the report, and immediate interim compliance steps pending permanent oversight office.

Decisions

  • •Adopt fee schedule (5-0).
  • •Approve referral (5-0).
  • •Approve SIP update with board directions (5-0).
  • •Authorize lease revenue bonds (5-0).

Directions

  • •Administration to publicize waiver and billing options and report back on impacts.
  • •Administration to reconcile discrepancies in reported percentages, propose interim measures for safety assessments and safety-plan uploads, and accelerate recruitment for an office of compliance; return with consultant recommendations.
  • •Administration to return in Jan. 2027 with an assessment and recommended steps.
  • •Continue community engagement and align SIP metrics for next cycle starting July 2027.
  • •Proceed with bond sale and return with debt-service implications and potential study session on capital planning.
6
Oct

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors October 5, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors reconvened in open session to approve ceremonial items, present monthly employee excellence awards, and proclaim observances including National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, Filipino American History Month and Binational Health Week. The board also recognized county staff for Super Bowl 60 and World Cup operational support and honored a retiring deputy district attorney.

Discussion Points

  • •EOC activation length for Super Bowl and World Cup; planning start date; list of participating agencies.
  • •Monthly employee awards presented and recipients named.
  • •Proclamation of Cybersecurity Awareness Month; investments and strengthened protections for election systems.
  • •Proclamation recognizing Binational Health Week; historical counts of events and screenings; cited health disparities and upcoming summit.
  • •Proclamation recognizing Filipino American History Month; list of community events; encouragement of participation.
  • •Proclamation recognizing local business association and economic-development activities.
  • •Recognition of career achievements; examples of policy and training work; expressions of gratitude.

Directions

  • •Public-health partnerships and community outreach should continue.
1
Oct

Redevelopment Dissolution Countywide Oversight Board - September 30, 2026 (complete)

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Oversight Board met Sept. 30, 2026 to elect leadership, authorize Milpitas successor agency to pursue refunding bonds if market and savings conditions are met, and receive a countywide update on remaining successor-agency dissolution items.

Discussion Points

  • •Advisers explained bond history and parameters; board asked for NPV math and interest-rate context; members sought sunset/expiration language and confirmed final maturity restrictions.
  • •Board noted requirement to elect chair/vice once per year per board rules; members questioned whether term is calendar or fiscal-year based.
  • •San Jose presenters said CC&R work faces staffing and funding limits; board members requested timelines and fiscal-impact flags.
  • •Staff summarized remaining successor-agency items by city, noting 7 agencies remain and specific outstanding properties/agreements in Campbell, San Jose and Sunnyvale.

Decisions

  • •Board approved motion requiring annual consolidated report; staff to return with updated materials at the January meeting if necessary.
  • •Resolution authorized; successor agency may go to market only if NPV and other parameters are met; bond documents to be submitted to DOF.
  • •Tony Estramara nominated as chair and Dave Snow as vice chair; board accepted explanation that term generally follows fiscal-year practice.

Directions

  • •San Jose to return with details on DDAs/CC&Rs and resource estimates if additional funding is required.
  • •Staff to include explicit 3% NPV and maturity guardrails in resolution; return updated debt-service savings analysis if item returns to board later.
  • •Staff to prepare an annual consolidated countywide dissolution status report with target completion dates and a fiscal-impact yes/no indicator.
24
Sep

County of Santa Clara Planning Commission Meeting - September 24, 2026, 6:00 p.m. (complete)

California/Santa Clara County

The Santa Clara County Planning Commission certified a final EIR and approved a use permit, architecture & site approval, and grading permit for the Bay Area Vipassana Center on a 54.59-acre parcel near Gilroy after a lengthy public hearing and debate over groundwater, fire protection and grading. The motion passed 5–1 with Commissioner Belska dissenting; the decision is subject to a 15-calendar-day appeal period.

Discussion Points

  • •Applicant clarified volunteers/staff roles, donation model and that longer retreats would begin about five years after startup.
  • •Commissioners asked detailed technical questions and requested clarifications from staff and consultants.
  • •Concerns that the proposal relies on a single dead‑end access for up to 150 occupants; commissioners requested further evaluation of evacuation pathways and retention of alternate site access if feasible.
  • •Deputy Fire Marshal explained that a combined potable/fire tank is allowable and that tank sizing will be reviewed at the tank/building permit stage.
  • •Neighbors and Happy Acres representatives argued the EIR understates drought and cumulative pumping risks; consultants said test pumping and local recharge via Uvas Reservoir demonstrate resilience.
  • •Public comment included many supporters arguing for community benefits and many nearby residents and Happy Acres Mutual Water Company representatives raising groundwater and evacuation concerns.
  • •Staff described the site program and operational schedule; commissioners asked for clarification on participant caps and timing for longer retreats.
  • •Staff noted state oversight for small public water systems and required permit conditions for treatment and system operations.
  • •Staff recommended certification of the EIR and approval of permits with conditions; commissioners asked clarifying questions about wells, cut/fill, EV infrastructure and stormwater.
  • •Supporters emphasized free courses, volunteer model and land stewardship; opponents emphasized water supply, septic and evacuation concerns.

Decisions

  • •Commission approved project with conditions; technical water‑system designs to be confirmed at permit stage.
  • •EIR certified; concurrent land use permits granted subject to conditions and corrected grading numbers.
  • •Project approved; fire protection and tank permitting are conditions of the approval and will be reviewed at building permit stage.
  • •Project description adopted as part of the approved land‑use permit with conditions limiting operations and requiring implementation of mitigation measures.
  • •Public comment concluded and hearing closed; commission approved project with conditions.

Directions

  • •Decision recorded and appeal instructions provided.
  • •Project construction timeline and permit-level details to be completed through grading and building permits.
  • •Require detailed fire protection plans, tank permitting and consider requiring retained or dedicated emergency access during permit review.
  • •Require permit‑level hydrology and water‑system submittals and monitoring as conditions of approval.
  • •Staff to ensure permit conditions require additional technical designs and monitoring; commissioners to rely on conditions and mitigation monitoring program.
  • •Staff to verify grading/cut-fill quantities and require drainage/stormwater controls under conditions 77–84; civil engineering and tank permits to be completed at permit stage.
18
Sep

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors September 15, 2026 9 30 a m

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors convened on 2026-09-15 in San Jose. The board opened with roll call, invocation and a proclamation for Mexican Independence celebrations; heard public comment on county jail spending and other items; approved a revised consent calendar; accepted a year‑end HUD CAPER report; endorsed the 2026–2030 Community Plan to End Homelessness; denied a petition to rescind a tax‑defaulted property sale; referred a Healthy Hydration (school drinking water) initiative for further planning with Valley Water; approved a youth mental‑health referral; received a Child Care Blueprint and several department reports; and reviewed legislative priorities.

Discussion Points

  • •Board discussed whether program should be complaint‑driven or need‑based, coordination with 1st 5 and school districts, and Valley Water funding commitments.
  • •Families cited cost, wait lists and difficulty navigating subsidies; workforce pay and safety concerns noted.
  • •Presenters described plan goals, numeric targets, and subregional approach; supervisors emphasized fidelity to evidence‑based prevention and need for disaggregated data.
  • •Staff presented detailed FY26 accomplishments and expenditure levels; supervisors asked for clarification on unspent CV funds and program specifics.
  • •Supervisors requested detail on subsidy uptake, unmet need and targeted facility investments.

Decisions

  • •Board approved submission of the CAPER.
  • •Board endorsed the Community Plan to End Homelessness.
  • •Board received blueprint and authorized next steps.
  • •Referral approved contingent on Valley Water funding decision.

Directions

  • •Convene implementation committee; prioritize maximization of existing federal/state funds; return with progress in six months.
  • •Return after Valley Water approves financing; prioritize sites by need, pursue low‑cost quick fixes first.
  • •Staff to return with subregional plans and disaggregated outcome reporting; progress reports biannually and Hewlett updates in fall.
  • •Staff to submit CAPER to HUD and return with status of unspent funds.
18
Sep

County of Santa Clara Children, Seniors, and Families Committee Meeting September 18, 2026 12:30 pm

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Children, Seniors and Families Committee discussed a state-driven shift of suicide-prevention funding to Public Health, rollout of the school-based behavioral health fee schedule and School Link Services, the new County Schools Collaborativework on chronic absenteeism, data on behavioral-health referrals for children in the child welfare system, and a corrective-action update after a critical CDSS case-file review.

Discussion Points

  • •24 of 32 districts implemented the fee schedule; the SLS program served 6,900 students.
  • •82% of 707 DFCS-involved children were matched to BH providers; the remainder may be served elsewhere or reflect data-matching limits.
  • •CDSS case-file review showed systemic documentation and practice failures; DFCS director acknowledged a failing grade for reviewed cases.
  • •Chronic absenteeism considered a public-health issue linked to housing and food insecurity.
  • •Collaborative to emphasize place-based, cross-system solutions and to report regularly.
  • •Departments described direct referral pathways and faster access for acute needs.
  • •State shifted prevention funding; county received $300,000 from CDPH and will pursue larger CDPH grants for community organizations.
  • •Supervisors demanded detailed, rapid follow-up and a full-board briefing with CDSS present.
  • •Supervisors requested data disaggregation and school-county collaborative outreach.
  • •Supervisors requested disaggregated data and technical assistance for remaining districts.

Decisions

  • •Motion to receive report; staff directed to return with plan.
  • •Motion to schedule CDSS briefing for full board and to return with follow-up deliverables.
  • •Receive update; report-back timeline established (one month after convenings).
  • •Report received.
  • •Report received; follow-up analysis requested.

Directions

  • •Behavioral Health to re-examine data disaggregation for AAPI subgroups.
  • •Behavioral Health to request county-level utilization data from DHCS and provide district provider maps.
  • •Departments to improve regular data matching and return with further analysis by November.
  • •DFCS and BHSD to study engagement barriers for families who decline services.
  • •DFCS to provide an initial response and timeline in October and an extended corrective-action update in November.
  • •Invite Office of Supportive Housing and other county partners to future meetings.
  • •Public Health to conduct outreach to community-based organizations and return with an implementation timeline.
  • •Public Health to provide more disaggregated data and a proposed collaborative meeting schedule.
  • •Set up internal compliance office and ensure it reports to the board on ongoing case reviews.
  • •Staff to produce an inventory of school-based initiatives and a outcomes framework.
18
Sep

County of Santa Clara Housing, Land Use, Environment, & Transportation Committee September 17, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Housing, Land Use, Environment & Transportation Committee heard an annual Integrated Natural Resource Management report and approved motions to seek pesticide soil testing in South County; the committee reviewed agricultural economic-development initiatives and debated a proposed food-hub location at the Fairgrounds; members received an update on the housing element and RHNA shortfall and approved quarterly reports.

Discussion Points

  • •Coordination with Agricultural Commissioner and Public Health for testing and outreach
  • •Health impacts of pesticide exposure in South County and on agricultural workers
  • •IPM emphasis on prevention and nonchemical controls

Decisions

  • •Motion to test soils and report back approved

Directions

  • •Staff to coordinate testing and outreach and report back
15
Sep

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors September 15, 2026 9:30 a.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors heard proclamations and memorials, took public comment including opposition to a jail expansion, approved several consent items, heard staff reports on housing and homelessness (including endorsement of the 2026–2030 Community Plan to End Homelesness), approved a school drinking-water referral with Valley Water as a likely funder, received a child-care blueprint and several public-health and legislative updates, and denied a petition to rescind a tax-defaulted sale.

Discussion Points

  • •How to ensure federal funds are used with fidelity to prevention and permanent housing goals
  • •Need for a simple reporting website; priority should be needs‑based not complaint‑driven; many school districts lack resources
  • •Supervisors requested disaggregated data reporting by race, ethnicity, gender; subregional plans to align strategies and funding
  • •Targets include housing 3,000 households/year by 2030; emphasis on prevention and embedding lived-experience leadership

Decisions

  • •Authorize submission to HUD
  • •Formal endorsement of the Community Plan by the Board
  • •Referral approved contingent on Valley Water funding

Directions

  • •Finalize subregional plans; schedule city council endorsements; provide HLUET updates and annual board reporting
  • •Seek Valley Water funding commitment; create needs‑based prioritization and quick fixes list; staff to return with plan after Valley Water action
  • •Submit CAPER and continue oversight/reporting
15
Sep

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors September 14, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors held a ceremonial session with proclamations and awards, including CalWORKs achievement awards, proclamations for Hispanic Heritage Month, National Voter Registration Day, and recognitions for county departments and community organizations.

Discussion Points

  • •Association's 50-year history, scholarship fundraising (more than $50,000 planned).
  • •Board urged registration and early ballot return.
  • •CalWORKs provides employment-based services and supportive services including childcare, transportation, food and housing supports.
  • •Parks Department is funded by voter-approved park measures since 1972.
  • •Partnerships with community colleges and employers assist clients into stable employment.
  • •Registrar emphasized outreach programs and multilingual services.
  • •Sheriff's office deployed additional personnel and coordinated with regional partners to secure events.
  • •Speakers linked cultural preservation to economic and housing challenges in the county.
  • •Speakers stressed mentorship and representation in law.
  • •The proclamation recognizes National Hispanic Heritage Month and calls attention to cultural institutions and investment needs.
  • •Urban forestry is framed as infrastructure and community engagement is essential.
  • •VTA reported record ridership during major events, including World Cup games.
10
Sep

County of Santa Clara Public Safety and Justice Committee September 10, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

The Santa Clara County Public Safety & Justice Committee met to hear public comment alleging interference by the District Attorney's Office in child-advocacy screening, review custody health servicessubstance-use treatment in jails, discuss electronic monitoring and pretrial supervision, and consider an annual restorative justice report and funding gap.

Discussion Points

  • •Chair Ellenberg requested a one-year report with intermediate updates and a public dashboard to improve transparency.
  • •Consent calendar approved; staff directed to return with follow-up reports on substantive items.
  • •County staff and supervisors stated that California law limits discussion of active investigations and that cross-reporting is mandatory.
  • •Parent Ben C. alleged the District Attorney's Office blocked referrals to the Child Advocacy Center for his children and asked supervisors to intervene.
  • •Staff described voluntary urine testing policies and challenges in identifying detained people with substance-use disorders.
  • •Staff reported a rise in EM use since pre-COVID levels and noted costs and resource intensity.
  • •Staff reported the loss of Title II funding and estimated the annual program cost at $182,000.
  • •Staff said a medication for alcohol use disorder has been provided since 2013 and that multiple FDA-approved medications are available.
  • •Supervisors and defense/court partners emphasized the need to match supervision levels to individual risk and to track outcomes.
  • •Supervisors asked staff to pursue grants, philanthropic partners and city co-funding and requested a written update.
  • •Supervisors requested quantitative tracking of medication utilization and a schedule for follow-up reporting.
  • •Youth Alliance provided bridge funding to finish active restorative agreements but new referrals were paused.

Decisions

  • •Consent calendar approved; motions to receive reports and request follow-up passed.
  • •Motion to direct staff to deliver the one-year report and dashboard was made and seconded.
  • •Motion to receive report and request follow-up passed.
  • •Motion to receive the report and request written follow-up passed.

Directions

  • •Staff to coordinate with district attorney and public defender offices and the courts to assemble data and produce a public dashboard and a one-year report with interim updates.
  • •Staff to prepare an after-agenda written update on funding options and the use/history of asset-forfeiture funds.
  • •Staff to provide follow-up reports as requested in respective items.
  • •Staff to provide initial six-month follow-up with medication counts, then annual reporting.
9
Sep

County of Santa Clara Finance and Government Operations Committee September 8, 2026 2:00 p.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Finance & Government Operations Committee (Santa Clara County) held a study session on Sept. 8, 2026 to review a proposed RFP for management audit services and to consider strategic changes to the county's 10-year capital improvement plan, including funding gaps, seismic work for hospitals, and options to leverage county real estate.

Discussion Points

  • •Behavioral health pavilion nearing inspections and activation; South County Children's Advocacy Center projected completion Jan. 2027.
  • •Chair reminded the committee of legal limits on discussing active child-abuse investigations and mandated cross-reporting rules.
  • •Committee discussed prioritizing campuses and aligning design and construction funding to avoid unnecessary debt costs.
  • •Ground leases preferred over one-time sales to preserve long-term institutional value.
  • •Mandatory seismic upgrades for hospital facilities by 2030 are driving CIP priorities.
  • •Old City Hall is deteriorating and may require demolition or redevelopment.
  • •Permitting and statewide demand for inspections may constrain schedule and raise costs.
  • •Public commenter alleged trafficking involving a named individual and the Wexner Foundation.
  • •RFP has not been out to bid for over a decade; unique reporting structure (contractor reports to Board).
  • •Staff presented asset inventory, FCI metrics, and multiple deferred-maintenance estimates (including an $8B 10-year figure).
  • •Valley Health Center completion and grand opening scheduling.
  • •Vice Chair requested prescreening and rubric changes to limit price weighting.

Decisions

  • •Committee voted to receive the report.
  • •Motion to forward the RFP to the Board passed.

Directions

  • •Administration to prescreen proposals and bring top recommendations to FGOC for comparison.
  • •Continue prioritizing seismic projects and adjust financing/timing in CIP updates.
  • •Staff to prepare more detailed project lists, funding scenarios and an asset map for committee and Board review.
  • •Staff to present redevelopment or disposal options tied to revenue projections.
28
Aug

County of Santa Clara Planning Commission Meeting August 27, 2026 6:00 p.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Planning Commission met Aug. 27, 2026. The commission approved a 7-lot subdivision at 379 Meadow Lane (including one deed-restricted low‑income unit) and upheld staff's finding that a 1125 East Main Ave. SB 330 housing application is incomplete; commissioners also received a detailed briefing on the county's code enforcement/code compliance program.

Discussion Points

  • •Applicant affirmed willingness to work with neighbors and county on frontage and driveway impacts.
  • •Applicant argued the will‑serve requirement is not a completeness item and disclosed pending litigation with Morgan Hill over service.
  • •Applicant requested continuance to review project scope; staff supported continuance.
  • •Commissioners debated 90‑day resubmittal rules and tolling agreements.
  • •County counsel described mechanisms for compliance agreements and civil enforcement when necessary.
  • •No in‑person public commenters; public comment options remain open via email or written comment.
  • •Program aims to prioritize health and safety and achieve voluntary compliance through education, not punitive action as first step.
  • •Project qualifies for an AB 130 CEQA infill exemption applied to SB 330 builder's remedy projects.
  • •Staff and public commenters said missing will‑serve letters and technical data (hydrant flows, road dedication labels, etc.) prevent adequate CEQA analysis.
  • •Staff caseloads are high (estimated 150–300 active cases per officer) and backlog reduction is underway.
  • •Staff recommended conditions to mitigate fire access and stormwater concerns; Valley Water permission required if discharge to easement.

Decisions

  • •Approve subdivision and grading permit, accept CEQA exemption, and remove redundant Condition 52.
  • •Continue item to date uncertain.
  • •Deny appeal and uphold incompleteness.
  • •No formal action required; commissioners requested follow‑up information.

Directions

  • •Applicant may resubmit with the required checklist items or pursue other remedies; department to provide clarity on remaining checklist items.
  • •Applicant to coordinate with Valley Water if discharge into easement is proposed.
  • •Conditions to address fire turning radius and low impact development stormwater treatment to be included in permit conditions.
  • •Department to continue permit process improvement updates and return with proposed public education materials and clarification on use‑permit revocation procedures.
  • •Explore technology/tracking improvements and clarify metrics for case age and unresolved counts.
  • •Staff to re‑notice the project after review of any scope changes.
28
Aug

County of Santa Clara Children, Seniors, and Families Committee Meeting August 27, 2026 1:30 p.m.

California/Santa Clara County

The Santa Clara County Children, Seniors and Families Committee met on August 27 to hear public comment and receive several reports about foster care recruitment and placement services, the Families First Community Pathway pilot, and the newly launched Justice Services and Support Department. Supervisors and providers discussed ISFC Plus placements, recruitment and retention barriers — especially housing and state reimbursement rates — and requested a strategic media and outreach plan and legislative action on funding formulas.

Discussion Points

  • •Need for shared language on primary/secondary/tertiary prevention; use of advisory boards and community engagement framework; mapping of services to identify gaps.
  • •Program description and case example presented by providers; training and 24/7 clinical supports for caregivers; barriers include housing cost and program delivery constraints.
  • •Public allegations of child abuse and institutional failure raised during public comment; speaker requested removal of named officials.
  • •Seneca announced a statewide wind‑down; DFCS and county to coordinate minimizing disruption.
  • •State rate structure and proposed tiered rates may not address cost differences; county supplements state funds; out‑of‑county placements increase when local costs are not covered.

Decisions

  • •Committee received the report and requested follow-up.
  • •Committee received the report and requested follow‑up on legislative strategy.
  • •Committee received the update and requested follow‑up materials.
  • •Committee received the update; no formal directive beyond the request for transition coordination.
  • •No formal personnel or investigatory action announced at meeting.

Directions

  • •Bring written program inventories and quarterly data to the October meeting; return with implementation updates in September.
  • •Chair provided hotline and stated county takes allegations seriously.
  • •Coordinate legislative strategy and regional advocacy through county IGR and Bay Area consortiums.
  • •County executive/DFCS to develop strategic outreach/media plan and return with update.
  • •DFCS to work with providers to preserve caregiver capacity and continuity.
20
Aug

County of Santa Clara Housing, Land Use, Environment, & Transportation Committee August 20, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Housing, Land Use, Environment & Transportation Committee received and approved reports on the Planning Commission work plan, sustainability achievements and an Urban Forest Master Plan; heard a quarterly update on permitting improvements including a new Property Explorer and preapproved ADU plans; received the supportive-housing dashboard; and heard department reports on parks, roads and other operations.

Discussion Points

  • •Annual street-resurfacing completed ~65 miles; slide repair in one district under way; storm preparedness for El Nif1o anticipated.
  • •Committee members thanked commissioners and requested follow-up details for implementation timelines.
  • •July 5 wildfire near Quicksilver County Park contained without injuries; rangers and partner agencies assisted.
  • •Phishing scams led to a posted alert; one payment referred to the district attorney.
  • •Planning Commission chair emphasized SB 9 and SB 1123 implementation, ADU updates, rural zoning, and permit streamlining.
  • •Preapproved ADU plans available online, Property Explorer shows jurisdictional and constraint data, virtual appointment system expands customer access.
  • •Questions about philanthropic partnerships and safe parking program effectiveness were raised.
  • •Questions addressed wildfire risk in planting decisions and how priority areas intersect with the wildland-urban interface.
  • •Staff exceeded housing placement goals but noted continued high demand and funding pressure.
  • •Staff framed the report around federal funding rollbacks and local strategies; highlighted solar installations, Good Food Purchasing progress and air-filtration distribution.
  • •Supervisors pressed for distribution details and connections to regional food-hub planning.
  • •Urban Forest Master Plan origins and community outreach (900 responses), stakeholder engagement, and the plan\u0019s tools (mapping, ordinance roadmap).

Decisions

  • •Motion to receive the Planning Commission report and forward it to the Board passed.
  • •Motion to receive the Urban Forest Master Plan passed; staff to make the plan available online.

Directions

  • •Continue homelessness-prevention efforts, pursue philanthropic partnerships and report back on capacity metrics.
  • •Continue storm preparedness; finalize slide-repair work and apply for rangeland grant approvals.
  • •Forward the received work plan to the Board of Supervisors for consideration.
  • •Publish interactive map and pursue collaborative grant applications with municipalities; form a county urban forestry working group.
  • •Staff to develop clearer linkages from property profiles to next-step counter or inquiry actions; to pursue survey metrics and report back on code enforcement timeline in the next quarterly update.
  • •Staff to provide a follow-up list of geographies and community-based organizations served by air-filtration distributions.
19
Aug

County of Santa Clara Health and Hospital Committee August 19, 2026 9:30 a.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Health & Hospital Committee received a wide-ranging public health update and detailed briefings on a draft EMS RFP and EMS system redesign, heard public comments about child abuse accusations and health plan continuity, and approved routine consent items and several reports.

Discussion Points

  • •Continuity-of-care protections guarantee a one-year window; extensions are possible for ongoing treatment.
  • •Disparities in infant mortality and life expectancy by race and neighborhood; pandemic-related declines in subgroups.
  • •Distribution of Life Files to 9,000 households to support on-scene decisions.
  • •Expanded behavioral-health transport and nurse navigation pilots.
  • •Improved first-pass success rates for airway procedures.
  • •Initial MMU users primarily for sports physicals and sick visits; schedule adjustments to accept appointments.
  • •Language-access provider shortages (Farsi, Russian, Vietnamese noted) were described as areas of concern.
  • •Need for disaggregated data and community-engaged goal-setting for equity targets.
  • •Network disruption after Optum/UnitedHealthcare changes created reassignment and continuity challenges for members.
  • •Plans for back-to-school outreach and senior-center engagement to increase utilization.
  • •Program-level interventions: Perinatal Equity Initiative, Good Food Purchasing, Community Health Worker feasibility, Cities Lead cohort participation.
  • •Shift RFP emphasis from only response-time metrics to include clinical performance metrics and tiered-response models.
  • •Stakeholder feedback from fire chiefs and cities highlighted concerns about subcontracting and operational flexibility.
  • •State approval timeline creates procurement delay risk; staff estimates earliest major changes operational in 2029 due to procurement, equipment, and staffing ramp needs.

Decisions

  • •Committee approved the Public Health report.
  • •Committee received the MMU pilot report.
  • •Committee received the report.
  • •Committee requested data and set October follow-up.
  • •Committee voted to receive the EMS briefing and continue stakeholder engagement.

Directions

  • •County to monitor broader January policy changes that could affect tens of thousands of members.
  • •Increase outreach as campuses reopen; report utilization in follow-up.
  • •Integrate measurable clinical metrics into procurement specifications and scoring.
  • •Public Health to continue outreach and report back on program implementation timelines.
  • •Public Health to provide suicide-prevention metrics and further disaggregated data by subgroup.
  • •Staff to meet further with fire departments and jurisdictions to standardize minimum subcontract requirements.
  • •Staff to post response-time compliance data and return to full board on August 25.
  • •VHP to return with counts of members who retained PCPs and those required to change, with language and line-of-business breakdowns by October.
16
Aug

County of Santa Clara Finance and Government Operations Committee August 16, 2026 2:00 p.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Finance and Government Operations Committee met Aug. 18, 2026; the committee heard public comment alleging misconduct by the county district attorney, approved the consent calendar, received multiple management audit reports (Animal Services, Veteran Services), heard a report on Regional Medical Center operations and finances, and received an update on Guaranteed Basic Income pilots.

Discussion Points

  • •Animal Services management emphasized engagement/education model and recent staffing/dispatch changes.
  • •Audit found 12 findings and ~40 recommendations across enforcement, licensing, rabies clinics, recordkeeping, and performance measures.
  • •Baseline data show significant housing and income stress among participants.
  • •Clarity about one financial figure in the Public Administrator/Guardian item.
  • •Elimination of caseload standards (Dec 2025) allowed staff flexibility to reduce backlog.
  • •Language Access Unit is requiring monthly progress reports from vendors that miss contractual targets and discontinued one vendor.
  • •No committee referral, investigation, or formal action was taken during the meeting.
  • •Program includes a 36‑month evaluation period (24 months payments + 12 months follow‑up).
  • •Public commenters alleged ties between D.A. Jeff Rosen and the Wexner Foundation and raised concerns about animal‑welfare enforcement.
  • •Request to hold Item 7 for further briefing.
  • •RMC reported large gains in volume and revenue and described planned capital and service expansions.
  • •Supervisors asked about cadence of reporting and feasibility of trauma services at RMC.
  • •VetPro system limitations cause manual work and reporting difficulty; auditors estimated ~300 hours lost per year due to inefficiencies.
  • •VSO reported retroactive compensation recoveries and is transitioning scheduling to a county tool with improved reporting.

Decisions

  • •Consent calendar approved
  • •Most audit recommendations accepted; recommendation 2.1 withheld.
  • •Partial adoption of audit recommendations; specific recommendations (2.1, 2.3, 4.1, 5.1) not advanced pending more analysis.
  • •Report received; follow‑up items requested.
  • •Report received; requested ongoing communications.

Directions

  • •Advance agreed recommendations; withhold or refine recommendations that require interjurisdictional action or additional resources; request feasibility reports and expanded reporting to advisory bodies.
  • •CEO to follow up on public communications and report back on feasibility/metrics for future FGOC briefings.
  • •Hold Item 7 to next FGOC meeting and forward consent items to the full Board as recommended.
  • •Implement agreed recommendations; do not require exposing staff calendars to the public; continue work on scheduling tool.
  • •Provide comparative attrition data and continue quarterly reporting; pursue targeted outreach for hard‑to‑reach participants.
  • •Return in next 12‑month report with monitored impacts and vendor‑usage thresholds.
James R. Williams
County Executive
Sylvia Arenas
Supervisor — District 1
Betty Duong
Supervisor — District 2