Citizen Portal
Sign in
Front PageNationalFollowingFavorites
Aerial view of Moffett Field from the east, on takeoff from SJC

Photo: Dicklyon·CC BY-SA 4.0·via Wikimedia Commons

Friday, November 13, 2026
California / Santa Clara County / Mountain View

Mountain View

OverviewMeetingsDataOfficials
Population
83,7322024
Similar to communities in California
Household income
$189,9172024
More favorable than communities in California
Home value
$1.9 million2024
More favorable than communities in California
Unemployment
3.7%2026
More favorable than communities in California
Violent crime
2482023
Similar to communities in California
Work from home
30.6%2024
Higher than communities in California
Source: Polco GPAL, using data from the original source shown for each indicator.Data from Polco

Meetings

Loading meetings…

Mountain View, Calif.

Open map →
Santa Clara County, California · Census county shapes

Quick actions

Mountain View officials

All officials →

Hot topics in Mountain View

  1. 1 Flock Safety Cameras
  2. 2 Data Center Development
  3. 3 Short-Term Rental Rules
  4. 4 Property Tax Rates
  5. 5 Homeless Encampments
See more →
Citizen Portal
See government, clearly.
Platform
About usFor citiesTopicsNewsDiminished Fourth Estate
Support
Help center
Community
Affiliate programSupport CPVolunteer
Legal
PrivacyTerms
Find your state
ALAKARAZCACOCTDEDCFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMAMDMEMIMNMOMSMTNENHNJNMNVNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVAVTWAWIWVWYPRGUASVI
© 2026 Citizen Portal. Meeting records and summaries sourced from the public record.
52°F (11°C)
Slight chance light rain · L 48°
20 meetings
12
Nov

Nov. 9, 2026 Council Transportation Committee

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View Council Transportation Committee accepted a Safe Routes to School report and unanimously recommended a design concept for changes at Castro and California streets to the City Council. Members and public commenters discussed bicycle and pedestrian safety, design choices, project timing and other traffic concerns.

Discussion Points

  • •A committee member asked about schedule preferences and indicated no changes were needed.
  • •A committee member asked whether school route maps differ from the city maps; staff said Mountain View schools use the city maps.
  • •A committee member said the report deserved regular-agenda discussion and raised scooter use on sidewalks.
  • •A member asked about on-demand signal timing at Barbara and raised lane-marking and queue concerns near Castro and Miramonte.
  • •A member described people crossing Shoreline Boulevard toward Safeway; staff referred to a proposed crossing near 777 Shoreline and said design details and Caltrans review remained.
  • •Another member described the program as collaborative and iterative, citing prior school-district input and future project or rezoning discussions.
  • •Committee members raised questions about bicycle-lane width, parking, truck access, future traffic, infrastructure age, utility constraints and safety.
  • •Public commenters raised concerns about existing street treatments and bicycle access; another commenter supported roundabouts while requesting safer cycling movements and consideration of raised crosswalks.
  • •Staff explained that limited roadway storage constrains the effect of lane changes and said the location would be monitored.
  • •Staff said bollard and fencing choices would be developed later through urban design.

Decisions

  • •The committee accepted the report unanimously.
  • •The committee unanimously recommended the design concept to the City Council.
  • •The meeting minutes and 2027 schedule were approved unanimously.

Directions

  • •A committee member requested review of the signal and lane conditions; no formal assignment or motion was recorded.
  • •Staff said it would seek City Council approval of the concept in early 2027 and continue design evaluation.
11
Nov

Nov. 10, 2026 Joint Meeting of City Council and Shoreline Regional Park Community

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View City Council heard presentations on food assistance and El Niño preparedness, considered a housing development and park-code changes, and adopted a climate plan and appointed a new city attorney. Public commenters also raised concerns about RV parking and the Grant Road-Sleeper Avenue intersection.

Discussion Points

  • •Amoroso made a statistical assertion about veteran suicide rates that was not sourced or addressed during the meeting.
  • •Amoroso urged the council to consider veterans in homelessness and employment policies.
  • •Bishop summarized Mates’ experience and the selection process.
  • •Celia praised the intersection improvements but raised a concern about pedestrian-signal delay.
  • •Clark described evening distributions, mobile food access, school snacks, referrals and client choice.
  • •Council Member Ramirez asked about exceptions for commuters using trails after dark; staff and the city attorney said further work was needed.
  • •Council members debated measurement, prioritization, shuttle service and how to account for equity and transportation emissions.
  • •Council members discussed rowhouse design, open space, condominium construction-defect liability, affordable-home eligibility and pedestrian connectivity.
  • •McAllister criticized the project’s design, expense and traffic effects while speaking as a public commenter after recusing himself from the item.
  • •Officials discussed enforcement of the existing 15 mph trail limit and the possibility of more ranger presence and a trail ambassador program.
  • •Showalter said the grant could exceed $2 million and praised staff’s grant application work.
  • •Song said a trailer had remained near his home for nearly a week and described it as a 72-hour parking violation.
  • •Staff described preparedness, regional coordination, sandbag access and outreach.
  • •Staff described the amendment as code cleanup rather than a broader e-bike or trail-use policy review.
  • •Staff explained the former gatekeeper exemption, density-bonus waivers and limits on discretionary review.
  • •Staff said the plan itself neither appropriated funds nor established project budgets.
  • •The city described possible flooding, coastal impacts, high winds, downed trees and infrastructure damage.
  • •The mayor proclaimed National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week, with no council action on the presentation item.
  • •The mayor publicly summarized salary, benefits and other agreement terms.
  • •Tong Wen Song alleged that parked RVs limited visibility, narrowed the sidewalk and disturbed his household.

Decisions

  • •The city proclaimed Nov. 15-21, 2026, National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week.
  • •The consent calendar, including item 4.5, passed unanimously.
  • •The consent calendar, including the local emergency proclamation, passed unanimously.
  • •The consent calendar resolution authorizing a grant application and acceptance up to $2.3 million passed unanimously.
  • •The council approved the project package unanimously among participating members, with the mayor recused.
  • •The council unanimously adopted Climate Forward Mountain View for 2027-31.
  • •The council unanimously appointed Mates and authorized the employment agreement and revised salary plan.
  • •The council unanimously approved introducing the Chapter 38 ordinance.

Directions

  • •The mayor asked staff to look at the signal timing and see whether improvements could be made; the request was not made part of the motion.
  • •The motion requested that sustainability impacts be included in council-report analysis when appropriate.
  • •When appropriate, sustainability impacts should be included in the analysis of council reports.
10
Nov

Nov. 3, 2026 Downtown Committee

California//Mountain View

The City of Mountain View Downtown Committee reviewed downtown business and event updates, heard a police presentation and adopted its 2027 meeting calendar. Members also discussed accessibility, public safety and recurring repairs to downtown parking-garage elevators.

Discussion Points

  • •Committee members described strong turnout at the Halloween event, while the transcript’s sign-up count was unclear.
  • •Lieutenant Holt said auto burglaries appeared down based on observation and calls for service, but he did not have specific numbers.
  • •Members said the proposed schedule matched the prior year and had worked well.
  • •Presenter Tony reported vendor survey ratings, reported sales and customer engagement.
  • •Staff clarified that figures covered Mountain View citywide and categories were self-selected.
  • •Staff presented food-business trends based on the city business-license database.
  • •Staff said crews repair one of the three garage elevators nearly weekly and the city spends a substantial but unspecified amount on repairs.
  • •Staff said the city adopted its first public art strategy the prior week.
  • •Staff said the City Council had directed staff to evaluate the committee.
  • •Staff said the city is evaluating cameras, other deterrents, outage communications and the condition of the garages.
  • •Staff said the market was a pilot and outlined evaluation measures, including business outreach and sales-tax data.
  • •The chair raised concern that fewer meetings could reduce participation and emphasized the need for committee objectives.
  • •The discussion covered late-night activity, DUI enforcement, patrol scheduling and a stolen e-bike tracked outside Mountain View.
  • •The lieutenant urged people to report concerns through the non-emergency line so police outreach officers could assess possible services or referrals.
  • •The report said Artline attendance increased and business patios were busy.
  • •The report said Oktoberfest attendance on Saturday was about 15% greater than the prior year.
  • •The strategy sets a 10-year vision, recommendations and action items; staff described community input and downtown interest in additional art.

Decisions

  • •The city had adopted the public art strategy before this meeting, according to staff.
  • •The committee unanimously approved six meetings for 2027.

Directions

  • •City Council had directed staff to evaluate the downtown committee, according to staff.
  • •Staff said it would conduct direct outreach to businesses and use feedback when evaluating future markets.
  • •The lieutenant encouraged people to use the non-emergency line to report concerns.
10
Nov

Nov. 4, 2026 Parks and Recreation Commission & Urban Forestry Board

California//Mountain View

The City of Mountain View’s Parks and Recreation and Urban Forestry Board heard reports on Friends of Deer Hollow Farm and proposed tree replanting and pest-management changes. Members discussed tree health, planting choices and maintenance; the board also approved a 2027 meeting schedule.

Discussion Points

  • •A board member questioned whether the nonprofit’s roughly $600,000 fund balance was large relative to annual expenses and asked about possible capital, enhancement or operational uses.
  • •A commenter asked whether grub treatments could affect pollinators.
  • •Board members debated whether locally native trees would better support local wildlife and whether proposed Oregon white oaks were appropriate for the site.
  • •Board members discussed retaining or restoring the Centennial tree history and whether pollinator planting belonged at the proposed sites.
  • •Commenters raised oak pollen, disease risk, plant toxicity, maintenance, tree size and public use concerns.
  • •Davis said the reserve protected the farm against fundraising downturns and identified a garage-door safety project as a possible enhancement request.
  • •Public commenters said organic products are not necessarily nontoxic and urged a broader pause while the plan is reviewed.
  • •Staff described existing practices and options to reduce pesticide and herbicide use.
  • •Staff estimated more than 30 monitored trees were likely to recover and that most of the other trees might need removal.
  • •Staff explained why the January 2027 meeting was shifted to the third Wednesday.
  • •Staff said imazapyr was detected in submitted samples but testing did not establish whether or how much it caused tree decline.
  • •The board asked how the herbicide was selected and what other causes could have contributed.

Decisions

  • •No final planting concept or species list was approved by formal vote.
  • •No formal vote was taken on an updated integrated pest management policy.
  • •The board approved the draft 2027 meeting schedule as presented.
  • •The presentation did not establish a citywide halt on all chemical treatments.

Directions

  • •Staff said it would assess workload and present an updated plan-review timeline at a January meeting.
  • •Staff said it would incorporate board input and continue coordination with Public Works on planting timing and locations.
  • •Staff said it would stop herbicide applications in tree wells and stop using string trimmers around tree bases.
3
Nov

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors November 2, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Monday's Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors meeting (ceremonial items and proclamations) featured employee awards, multiple proclamations (Sikh American Awareness, Diabetes Awareness, Native American Heritage Month), retirements and community recognitions. The meeting was adjourned to reconvene Tuesday, Nov. 3 at 9:30 a.m.

Discussion Points

  • •Colleagues emphasized his role during emergency public health enforcement.
  • •Community speakers urged continued county support and reporting of hate incidents.
  • •Multiple employees and teams were recognized for service across library, public safety, health, roads, and communications.
  • •Owens’ appointment as chamber president and her priorities for internships, access to capital and digital modernization.
  • •Prevalence figures cited (9% diagnosed, 22% prediabetes) and strategic plan findings on disparities.
  • •Procedural approval of ceremonial items to be presented later in the meeting.
  • •Proclamation recognizes Sikh American Awareness Month and highlights community contributions (polling locations, food drives) and reports of targeted harassment.
  • •Public health called for broader prevention measures addressing social determinants.
  • •Rossi’s career accomplishments across County Counsel teams and his leadership of the community protection team were described.

Decisions

  • •Ceremonial commendation; no county commitments recorded.
  • •Ceremonial proclamation; no new funding or programmatic directives recorded in the transcript.
  • •Ceremonial proclamation; no policy action recorded.
  • •Ceremonial recognitions; no follow-up directives recorded.
  • •Ceremonial retirement recognition; no board action recorded.
  • •Motion to approve item 7 carried with four ayes; Vice President Arenas absent.
2
Nov

County of Santa Clara Health and Hospital Committee November 6, 2026 10:00 a.m.

California/Santa Clara County

Health and Hospital Committee meeting of Santa Clara County on Nov. 6, 2026 covered public comment alleging child-welfare failures, a seismic-compliance update for county hospitals, Valley Health Plan member transitions after Optum's exit, the Alcove Palo Alto transition to a community partner, EMS clinical expansions, and federal/state policy and funding outlook.

Discussion Points

  • •Alcove remained open through transition; contracts and data agreements with Stanford and clinical partners are in progress
  • •Appropriations process and continuing resolution through Dec. 11 were discussed
  • •Behavioral health pavilion opened to patients on Nov. 3
  • •Buprenorphine to be used in prehospital setting with a COWS score
  • •De Anza mobile unit had 39 patients through September; De Anza ~15 encounters/month
  • •Guidance for earmark requests expected in February; due dates in March–April
  • •Lease‑revenue bond approved to fund projects; state review/certification is a bottleneck
  • •Multiple one‑time funders contributed to year one revenue
  • •New Congress will have many new members and staff; committee leadership changes may alter priorities
  • •Optum exit affected ~8,500 members; ~2,100 moved to existing PCPs; outreach conducted
  • •Paramedics authorized to monitor transfusions started at non‑trauma centers
  • •Public health warned of early flu season and encouraged vaccinations
  • •Staffing nearly complete; psychiatry expected to start in December
  • •Staff turnover delayed reporting to state; county submitted amended compliance reports
  • •State‑provided leave‑behind naloxone kits to be distributed to bystanders
  • •Supervisors requested member‑experience surveys and Medi‑Cal‑specific data
  • •Two compliance pathways for seismic program; some projects will not meet 2030
  • •VHP does not hold Medi‑Cal Optum contracts; Medi‑Cal members moved to Santa Clara Family Health Plan

Decisions

  • •Committee accepted the report and requested follow‑up
  • •Committee received reports and approved votes on items 7 and 8
  • •Committee received the report
  • •Committee received the report and approved by motion
  • •Committee received the update and approved the report

Directions

  • •Administration and Alum Rock to return with a full‑year update and metrics
  • •Administration to return with streamlining recommendations and more detailed project status in next operational report
  • •Continue to monitor mobile clinic utilization and publicize clinic availability; track vaccination outreach metrics
  • •County to prepare project concepts and begin vetting earmark candidates
  • •EMS to engage with dispatch and fire partners; provide quarterly digitalization update
  • •VHP to return with a separate Medi‑Cal/Optum West transition report and to add survey questions
30
Oct

City in Action - Bookmobile

California//Mountain View

Staff from the Mountain View Public Library described a new, narrower bookmobile and the library's outreach work, including weekly stops, material offerings, and an anecdote about serving a family of five at a community event.

Discussion Points

  • •Anecdote: serving a family of five at a local arts event.
  • •Description of a new, narrower bookmobile and its outreach purpose.
  • •Operational details: number of stops per week/month and carts of materials carried.
  • •Range of items carried beyond books (seed library, DVDs, backpacks, walking sticks).
29
Oct

Building a City: About the Budget Fiscal Year 2026-27

California//Mountain View

A city staff presentation reviewed the proposed fiscal year 2026–27 budget for the City of Mountain View, outlining projected revenues and expenditures, use of reserves to cover a shortfall, recent revenue measures including Measure G, and a ballot proposal to raise the hotel tax.

Discussion Points

  • •Council placed a ballot question to authorize increasing the transient occupancy tax up to 15%.
  • •Current-year general fund numbers and the plan to use reserves for one-time projects.
  • •Measure G passed in Nov 2024 and increased the city's real property transfer tax on transactions over $6,000,000.
  • •Planned modernization of technology systems and reaffirmation of AAA rating by S&P.
  • •Staff presented FY2026–27 revenue and expenditure projections and described revenue sources and planned uses of reserves.
  • •Staff recounted economic initiatives and a decline in downtown vacancy.

Decisions

  • •Measure placed on Nov 2026 ballot
28
Oct

Oct. 27, 2026 City Council Meeting

California//Mountain View

Mountain View City Council met Oct. 27, 2026. Council approved a new public art strategy, heard a MidPeninsula Open Space District update, approved consent items including a LinkedIn development agreement amendment and bond authorization, received Measure G revenue figures, and heard multiple public comments on housing, parking, and RVs.

Discussion Points

  • •Andrews reported $11,400,000 collected to date and explained the allocation cap and shifting distribution beyond $12,000,000.
  • •Assistant City Manager provided revenue numbers and explained allocation cap mechanics.
  • •Council approved both items as part of the consent calendar; staff provided Measure G revenue context.
  • •Council asked about Measure AA timing and e-bike policies; MidPen indicated next revenue measure likely not until around 2040.
  • •Council asked for updated projections and clarity on allocations to parks and open space.
  • •Fire and police representatives accepted and expressed gratitude.
  • •MidPen described acreage, trails, staffing and budget; highlighted wildfire resiliency, ADA access and a planned Highway 17 wildlife/pedestrian crossing.
  • •No immediate staff direction recorded.
  • •Proclamation read recognizing breast cancer awareness and the role of early detection and support.
  • •Public commenters urged mandatory percent-for-art, measurable benchmarks, free permits for art, and maintenance funding.
  • •Resident reported an incident and long-term nuisance related to RVs; described enforcement loopholes (rolling to avoid tow enforcement).
  • •Staff summarized extensive outreach and recommended creation of a pooled public art fund, maintenance policies, and percent-for-art exploration.
  • •Students presented essays on affordable housing and student safety; council recognized both winners and took photos.

Decisions

  • •Consent items 4.1 and 4.2 approved unanimously.
  • •Strategy adopted; staff to implement and return with milestones.

Directions

  • •Adopt strategy with council-proposed edits, direct staff to develop implementation milestones and study percent-for-art options; report progress annually.
  • •Proceed with ordinance/resolution finalization and coordinating financing paperwork.
  • •Staff to provide updated Measure G revenue and allocation projections to council and community.
23
Oct

October 22, 2026 Rental Housing Committee

California//Mountain View

Mountain View Rental Housing Committee on Oct. 22, 2026 remanded part of a hearing officer's decision about reported sleep interruptions but otherwise affirmed the decision; staff presented an annual petition program update showing fewer petitions and higher settlement rates, and staff announced upcoming workshops and tenant resources.

Discussion Points

  • •25% of petitions required language assistance.
  • •Availability of community partners on-site for tenant assistance.
  • •Committee emphasized legal limits on landlord remedies for neighbor\u0002s physical conditions such as snoring.
  • •Decrease in overall petitions and a higher share of habitability/ hardship petitions.
  • •High settlement rate (19 of 36 petitions, 53%) and staff outreach role.
  • •Implication that tighter vacancies could spur new construction and reduce availability of rent-controlled units.
  • •Public commenter recommended quarterly reporting rather than annual updates to improve timeliness and actionability.
  • •Reported 8% rent increase for newly built units over six months; falling vacancy rates for new and covered units.
  • •Respondent's attorney agreed with tentative decision; appellant absent.
  • •Schedule of upcoming workshops and help center hours.
  • •Staff found the record appears to show more sleep interruptions than the 10 nights documented in maintenance requests.

Decisions

  • •Committee adopted the tentative decision with a limited remand to address the factual finding about the 10 nights of interrupted sleep; remainder affirmed.

Directions

  • •None formal; committee asked staff to continue outreach and monitoring.
  • •None recorded; Chair thanked the speaker.
  • •Post details and sign-up information at mountainview.gov/housinghelpclinics.
  • •Staff to continue monitoring and reporting on vacancy and rent trends.
  • •Staff to request hearing officer to correct or explain the 10-night factual finding and cite evidence in the record.
22
Oct

Oct. 14, 2026 Parks and Recreation Commission and Urban Forestry Board

California//Mountain View

The City of Mountain View Urban Forestry Board heard public concern about herbicide use and denied an appeal to remove a heritage oak at 1473 Tyler Park Drive on a 3–2 vote; commissioners also began framing a citywide Heritage Tree Ordinance update and directed staff to pursue clearer permitting safeguards and outreach.

Discussion Points

  • •Develop data dashboards to track applications and canopy impacts.
  • •Educate contractors about alternatives (e.g., pipe bursting) that reduce excavation.
  • •Identify same-day permit types that can impact trees and prioritize portal screening language for three high-risk categories.
  • •Minutes approval; herbicide/IPM public concerns; denied appeal at 1473 Tyler Park Drive; ordinance update scoping and permitting portal changes.
  • •Options for emergency removal procedure if monitoring shows deterioration.
  • •Public requested a temporary moratorium on herbicide use in city parks and tree wells until IPM policy and implementation are updated and public transparency restored.
  • •Requests for more objective monitoring data (plumb line, repeat measurements) to detect progressive lean.
  • •Require clearer removal criteria, objective risk/evidence standards, stronger restitution/penalties and better public engagement.
  • •Require tree-protection inspection and field verification before work starts when trees are present.
  • •Speakers described tree die-off in Pioneer Park/library area and insufficient public outreach (QR codes).
  • •Staff committed to scoping an IPM policy review and public-engagement plan and return in January.
  • •Start ordinance update with vision-setting that aligns to the biodiversity plan rather than immediately drafting technical edits.
  • •Whether the tree’s documented condition met ordinance removal criteria vs. residents’ immediate safety concerns.

Decisions

  • •Appeal denied (staff denial upheld) on 3–2 vote.
  • •Minutes approved; appeal denied 3–2; staff to follow up on IPM, ordinance scoping and permitting changes.

Directions

  • •Consider community advisory committee and case-study workshops for stakeholder input.
  • •Staff to design and implement a simple monitoring method and specify triggers for emergency removal.
  • •Staff to develop multiple work-plan options (including vision-setting tracks) and return to PRC in January.
  • •Staff to document monitoring results and notify PRC if indicators worsen.
  • •Staff to draft boilerplate portal language and include screening questions; target inclusion for prioritized categories by end of calendar year and further rollout thereafter.
  • •Staff to return with IPM review plan and ordinance work-plan options in January; staff to prepare portal language for same-day permit screening; staff to develop monitoring protocol for the 1473 tree.
  • •Staff to scope IPM policy review and public-engagement process; include reporting and potential restrictions and bring options in January.
22
Oct

Oct. 19, 2026 Library Board of Trustees

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View Board of Library Trustees heard a report from the Friends of the Mountain View Public Library on fundraising and volunteer efforts, received presentations on youth programming (early literacy, school-age STEAM and robotics, and bookmobile outreach), approved minutes by roll call, and heard a board member announce they will not seek reappointment.

Discussion Points

  • •Bookmobile and class visits are expanding to reach families where they are.
  • •Curiosity kits and passive programming increase access but are not formally tracked.
  • •Early-literacy programs emphasize pre-reading experiences for ages 0–5.
  • •Eric announced he will not renew his term.
  • •Friends plan to trial a holiday pop-up at the German school market on Dec. 12.
  • •Friends purchased Biblio Tele (Spanish streaming service) now available on library website.
  • •Friends reported annual gift target of about $100,000 and operational statistics (volunteer count, donation volume).
  • •Library received 22 robotics kits through Team Succeed grant.
  • •New county park pass partnership introduced.
  • •Six programs required by the grant: three teen->teen, three teen->school-age.
  • •STEAM Fridays showed high attendance with teen volunteer support.
  • •Trustees expressed thanks for his service.
21
Oct

October 20, 2026 City Council Special Meeting

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View City Council held a special study session to interview four applicants for two open seats on the Environmental Planning Commission and debated whether to advance all four as finalists or reopen recruitment if an additional vacancy arises after the November election; the council voted 4-2 to advance all four candidates as finalists and authorized staff to run any needed recruitment.

Discussion Points

  • •directions to staff to post unscheduled vacancy notice if required and to hold study-session time prior to Dec. 15.
  • •How each applicant's technical and lived experience would inform CEQA review and precise plan advisory work.
  • •How to adapt precise plans for downtown and Moffett Blvd to increase housing and transit access; the implications of SB 79 on precise-plan timing and the housing element.
  • •Logistics and timing for recruitment and potential study session; county certification and CARC calendar.
  • •Whether advancing finalists tonight is fair to applicants who followed existing recruitment windows; alignment with CARC (appointments review committee) and county certification timetables; procedural options for handling a post-election vacancy.
  • •Whether to advance two finalists now vs. advancing all four as finalists and reopening recruitment if a vacancy occurs after the election; fairness to applicants who applied to multiple commissions; aligning appointment timing with county certification and the council appointments review committee (CARC).

Decisions

  • •Advance all four interviewees as finalists; proceed with recruitment only if a vacancy occurs; allow current applicants option to reinterview if recruitment reopens.
  • •Final appointment action scheduled for Dec. 15; clerk authorized to run recruitment if vacancy occurs; EPC seat terms identified.
  • •Motion to advance all four finalists passed 4-2; final appointment action scheduled for Dec. 15.

Directions

  • •Advance all four interviewees as finalists; authorize city clerk to run recruitment for any vacancy that occurs and hold time on Dec. 8/15 for study/session; allow current applicants the option to reinterview if recruitment is reopened and ensure identical questions if reinterviewed.
  • •Authorize clerk to run recruitment for any vacancy that occurs and to hold study-session time prior to the Dec. 15 appointment.
  • •Post 10-business-day unscheduled vacancy notice (if needed); allow current applicants to reinterview; prepare finalists list and staff report for Dec. 15.
14
Oct

October 13, 2026 City Council Meeting

California//Mountain View

Mountain View City Council issued several proclamations, heard a Caltrain update on ridership and a $7.1 billion operating gap, approved consent items including a pathways-to-housing action to explore funding for Hope's Corner, advanced a conceptual city fiber network plan (phase 1a), extended LinkedIn's development agreement with a $1.6M public-benefit fee (later directed to affordable housing), adopted an interim moratorium on detention facilities, and approved a solar+storage energy contract.

Discussion Points

  • •Businesses and residents reported safety and sanitation impacts from oversized vehicles; staff described added safe-parking capacity and enforcement options.
  • •Caltrain presented ridership and finance data and asked corridor partners to engage.
  • •Council adopted urgency ordinance unanimously and instructed staff to develop permanent regulations.
  • •Council approved contract award and CIP funding in a unanimous vote.
  • •Council directed staff to allocate full $1.6M to Affordable Housing Fund to support entitled projects that lack subsidy.
  • •Council directed staff to pursue Phase 1a in CIP and to create a reserve for future phases.
  • •DA extension to 2034 in exchange for $1.6M public-benefit fee; staff recommended parkland and housing allocation split.
  • •Direction given: staff to evaluate and return with options.
  • •Directions/decisions were to continue coordination; no formal council action requested.
  • •Direction: staff to return with November agenda item outlining regulatory proposals and enforcement steps.
  • •Hope's Corner requested help for a $303,000 laundry project; council framed request as consistent with Pathways to Housing.
  • •Phase 1a estimated at ~$1M; total project ~$16.7M; consultant found municipal ISP not financially viable in scenarios tested.
  • •Proclamations read and accepted by community representatives.
  • •Project scope: 4 sites, 2 roof replacements, battery at aquatic center; $5M CIP request and $920K anticipated IRA direct-pay incentive.
  • •Staff and community urged moratorium to preserve options while zoning is studied; local zoning language cited as a tool.

Decisions

  • •Adopted interim moratorium.
  • •Adopt Phase 1a direction and establish reserve as a seed for future work.
  • •Approve staff report and direct staff to explore funding options.
  • •Award contract to Excite Energy and appropriate $5M in CIP funds.
  • •DA extension ordinance introduced; allocation direction approved 5-2.

Directions

  • •Proceed to contract execution and design; claim federal incentives as available.
  • •Staff to bring formal proposals (Nov. 17 meeting) including potential prohibitions on predatory rental, unhitched trailers, refined enforcement of 72-hour rule, and sight-line/red curb actions.
  • •Staff to contact Hope's Corner and evaluate funding options.
  • •Staff to draft zoning amendments and return with recommendations.
  • •Staff to return at second reading with revised allocation directing full $1.6M to Mountain View Affordable Housing Fund.
  • •Staff to return with funding details during CIP process.
14
Oct

County of Santa Clara Finance and Government Operations Committee October 13, 2026 2:00 p.m

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara County Finance & Government Operations Committee reviewed the 2027 legislative platform and a set of departmental reports, received updates on employee development and county food-service planning, discussed data and metrics for the children's budget, heard public commenters raise concerns about child-welfare oversight, and approved routine consent items.

Discussion Points

  • •Clarification on which bill ideas will be recommended to board
  • •Facility and volume constraints (lower occupancy, telework, off-site public services)
  • •IGR outlined vetting process, timeline, partnership strategy and recent budget wins
  • •Interest in reentry culinary program and worker-owned co-op models
  • •Large employee participation in trainings; internal fill-rate target discussed
  • •Need for career ladders, job families, and easier pathways from temporary to permanent status
  • •Population-level indicators are useful but hard to link directly to program impact
  • •Public commenters alleged failures in child-welfare responses; staff noted confidentiality constraints
  • •Questions on outreach to new legislators and engagement strategy
  • •Supervisors want a narrow set of program-level measures (examples discussed: childcare seats, vaccination rates)

Decisions

  • •Committee voted to receive report and requested follow-up metrics
  • •Committee voted to receive the ESA report
  • •Committee voted to receive the report and forward to the board
  • •Committee voted to receive the report and support the RFI approach

Directions

  • •ESA to return with metrics and implementation steps
  • •IGR to refine recommended platform and bring final recommendations to full board in early November
  • •Office of Children and Families Policy to lead metric development and return in January
  • •Proceed with an RFI to gather possible models and partners
10
Oct

October 10, 2026 City Council Special Meeting

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View City Council held a brief special meeting to recess into a closed session to consider a public employee appointment: city attorney candidate interviews under California Government Code section 54957(b)(1). The presiding official noted there was no public comment, that the council would not return to an open session, and no announcement was anticipated.

Discussion Points

  • •Council recessed to closed session to conduct city attorney candidate interviews as a public employee appointment under California Government Code section 54957(b)(1).
10
Oct

County of Santa Clara Housing, Land Use, Environment, & Transportation Committee October 9, 2026

California/Santa Clara County

Santa Clara Countys Hewlett Housing, Land Use, Environment and Transportation Committee met in October to review the countys legislative platform for the coming session, receive the 2025 crop report, and review supportive-housing system reports; the committee approved the IGR report, the crop report, and the supportive housing report.

Discussion Points

  • •How reentry clients are tracked (self-reporting at intake; data matching limited by sharing agreements); partners supplement data.
  • •IGR outlined recent budget advocacy and bill-tracking accomplishments; committee asked for clarification on handling AB1621 and RHNA strategy.
  • •Inspection and weights-and-measures activity including plant shipment interceptions and device testing.
  • •Measure A production totals changed after including additional low-income units in the count.
  • •Parks grazing partnerships and events; roads paving season ending and El Camino/Page Mill improvement; plannings ag advisory kickoff; SIPA social-media outreach success.
  • •Risk of denied applications if only one formal review allowed by state law; need for early expert input and clearer applicant guidance.
  • •Total crop value for 2025 ($347.4M) and drivers (input costs, weather and markets).

Decisions

  • •Report accepted; staff to prepare follow-up and keep committee informed.
  • •Report accepted; staff to return with further breakdowns.
  • •Report received and filed.

Directions

  • •Staff to continue outreach, monitor commodity shifts and seek alternate sources for forest-product data.
  • •Staff to continue outreach to potential legislative authors and regional partners; consider pilot outreach/workshops for applicants in light of AB1621 deadlines.
  • •Staff to examine returns-to-homelessness at multiple timeframes and provide disaggregated reasons for return where data allow.
  • •Staff to explore pre-submittal consultations, pilot workshops and customer communication strategies to reduce resubmissions.
8
Oct

October 7, 2026 Meeting of the Environmental Planning Commission

California//Mountain View

The Mountain View Environmental Planning Commission on 2026-10-07 recommended city council adopt zoning amendments: (1) an all-electric construction incentive program for R‑1/R‑2 single‑family and duplex projects, and (2) an extensive R‑3/R‑4 zoning update with associated EIR findings and map changes. Both items advance to council for final action.

Discussion Points

  • •Commissioners asked for clearer documentation of map criteria and requested staff highlight policy tradeoffs for specific parcels (e.g., Starway, Del Medio).
  • •EIR identified significant unavoidable impacts to air quality, GHG and transportation; staff explained conservative VMT approach in CEQA analysis.
  • •EPC appended recommendations for public works to consider delivery/drop‑off laybys and asked staff to explain map 'value calls' in a single table for council review.
  • •Staff described four exceptions (5% FAR bonus; larger projections; rear yard encroachments; front/street side encroachments) designed to incentivize removal of gas meters and adoption of all‑electric equipment.
  • •Supporters emphasized unlocking housing and preventing further delay; opponents urged parcel‑specific caution and transitions near schools and quiet streets.

Decisions

  • •EPC recommended council adopt the R‑3/R‑4 package and certify the EIR with the requested clarifications; vote 6‑1.
  • •EPC voted to forward both the all‑electric recommendation and the R‑3 package (including San Antonio precise plan) to council with clarifications.
  • •EPC voted to recommend council adopt the zoning amendments and find the project CEQA exempt (7‑0).

Directions

  • •Staff to add EPC recommendations to the staff report to Council.
  • •Staff to include an EPC summary table of value judgments (the 'orphan' map decisions) and to note that Public Works is working on drop‑off layby standards.
  • •Staff to include clearer documentation of parcel‑level tradeoffs and rationale in council staff report.
  • •Staff to include EPC clarifications in council staff report and attachments.
  • •Staff to present EPC recommendation to City Council in December 2026 or January 2027; track all‑electric building permits and report via decarbonization plan.
7
Oct

October 6, 2026 - CSA Services: How the CSA can assist your tenants (Landlord Focused)

California//Mountain View

A webinar by the Community Services Agency (CSA) of Mountain View explaining tenant support services, intake and documentation requirements for landlord partners, food and senior programs, volunteering opportunities, and how CSA coordinates with the Emergency Assistance Network (EAN).

Discussion Points

  • •Case review by program director
  • •CSA part of Emergency Assistance Network (EAN) to refer out-of-area clients
  • •Grocery delivery to homebound seniors
  • •Grocery pantry and mobile pantry locations
  • •Importance of prompt responses to case managers to avoid delays
  • •Individualized case plans for seniors
  • •Intake and case-review process for rental assistance
  • •Intake steps: documentation, case manager assessment, landlord contact
  • •Landlord documentation required before check/payment submission
  • •Landlord documentation requirements to process payments
  • •Overview of CSA services and ZIP-code service limits
  • •Required documentation from landlords
  • •Senior hot-lunch program and homebound deliveries
  • •Transportation and accompaniment to medical appointments
7
Oct

October 6, 2026 - CSA: Learn about the CSA resources available in Mountain View (Tenant Focused)

California//Mountain View

A CSA presentation by Ariana Gómez outlined food, housing-stability, senior support and volunteer programs serving Mountain View, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills, described intake steps for assistance, and invited questions via chat or raised hand.

Discussion Points

  • •Details of pantry, school pantry, senior lunches, and emergency food bags
  • •Individualized care plans and home delivery of meals for seniors; transportation and social activities to reduce isolation.
  • •Overview of CSA mission and services; intake workflow; geographic coverage; volunteer invitations
  • •Rent/utilities assistance available; case review may include landlord documents; outreach to RVs and community sites
  • •Volunteer roles and age-limit caveat; intake steps and document requirements; case-manager assignment by availability.

Directions

  • •Staff will conduct outreach at encampments and community events
Emily Ann Ramos
Mayor
Chris Clark
Vice Mayor
Alison Hicks
Councilmember