Fresno County Board of Supervisors held its Nov. 3, 2026 meeting, approving routine consent items, adopting several proclamations, receiving the 2025 crop and livestock report, advancing a parks ordinance amendment, and receiving an update and Phase 2 recommendation from the Office of Housing and Homelessness.

Discussion Points

•Housing gap statistics: large shortfall of extremely low-income housing units in Fresno metro area.
•Need to recognize veterans and thank veterans services staff; description of local programs and outreach.
•Office staffed with nine FTEs; FY26–27 operational & grants totals; HUD NOFO funding efforts; change in point-in-time methodology from observational to service-survey.
•Only eight of 13 operators currently cleared for full duties; additional positions needed to maintain operations; no net county cost.
•Projected $20M deficit, high-cost claims near $30M, tier-specific contribution increases, use of reserves to buy down increases.
•Public allegation of a county employee mishandling disaster relief funds during Creek Fire.
•Purpose is to clean up code to help enforcement of park residency limits; concerns raised about tourism and low-capacity exceptions.
•Record gross production $9.642B; four commodities over $1B; water-efficiency highlighted; agave introduced as low-water option.
•Repeated contamination and aging storage tanks in Shaver Springs; questions about certified chief operator and oversight.
•Supervisors requested transparency and possible investigation.

Decisions

•Board accepted the report.
•Board adopted contribution changes and extended open enrollment.
•Board approved Phase 2 direction unanimously.
•Board approved staff recommendation to amend the ordinance.
•Board approved the positions unanimously.
•Proclamation adopted unanimously.

Directions

•Report to be posted on department website.
•Staff asked to investigate the public allegation and report back.
•Staff to assume operational oversight pending budget/salary resolutions and to return to board with those items.

Oct

Video

Fresno County Board of Supervisors met on 2026-10-20. The agenda included ceremonial recognitions, proclamations (Native American Heritage Month), capital-projects updates, a land-division appeal (variance) that was granted for a family homestead split, and a lengthy hearing that certified the final EIR for the Friant Ranch specific plan; public comment focused on library privatization and county employee health‑care cost increases.

Discussion Points

•Applicant argued exceptional circumstances due to existing nonconforming parcel pattern and public facilities designation.
•Colleagues highlighted Varela's career path and mentorship.
•County counsel and consultants described scope of court-ordered remedy and air-quality modeling.
•Design‑build versus traditional delivery advantages and risks.
•Employee health‑care premium increases prompted urgent requests for county contributions, use of reserves or renegotiation in bargaining.
•Library privatization proposals have mobilized staff and community; employees urged a formal board resolution.
•Project schedules for Clovis and Reedley libraries; Behavioral Health remodel complications when renovating older buildings.
•Public commenters raised concerns about water reliability, wildfire risk, traffic and adequacy of updated analyses.
•Supervisors deliberated on precedent and family‑use exception to minimum acreage standard.
•Supervisors thanked him for military and county service.

Decisions

•Appeal honored; variance granted for two‑parcel split.
•Consensus to pursue extra project delivery support.
•Final EIR certified; project components approved (planning commission recommendations adopted).
•No formal board vote recorded on privatization or health‑care changes in open session; staff to return with additional information.
•Proclamation and public recognition; photo opportunity.

Directions

•Authorize applicant to proceed with mapping for two parcels subject to standard mapping and recordation requirements.
•CAO and HR to provide information to bargaining units, staff and employees; closed‑session negotiations on health plans to continue.
•CAO to look into hiring additional construction management support and return with recommendations.
•Certify final EIR and adopt mitigation monitoring and reporting plan; require applicant to implement mitigation measures and infrastructure commitments.

Oct

Fresno County Board of Supervisors Meeting 10/20/2026

Fresno County Board of Supervisors convened Oct. 20, 2026, approved routine consent items, honored a retiring security officer and several proclamations, received a capital-projects update and direction to seek construction-management support, approved a two‑parcel subdivision appeal, and certified the Friant Ranch final EIR over public objections about water and air quality.

Discussion Points

•Applicant argued parcel is nonconforming and that neighborhood pattern supports a variance.
•Design‑build vs. traditional delivery pros and cons.
•Employees reported steep family‑plan premium increases and warned of recruitment/retention impacts.
•Extensive public comment raised water reliability, traffic, wildfire, environmental‑justice concerns, and the adequacy of project‑level modeling and changed‑circumstances review.
•Library staff emphasized community services, rural internet access, and voter‑backed Measure B funding.
•Overview of projects (libraries, behavioral health remodel, Elkhorn, ADA pods, probation campus).
•Proclamations for Yadira Gonzalez (Yale Educator Award), Native American Heritage Month, and Code Enforcement Appreciation Week.
•Recognition of Brian Varela for 30+ years of service and contributions to training and dispatch programs.
•Speakers urged board to adopt a formal resolution preserving public ownership of libraries.
•Supervisors emphasized family homestead exception vs. commercial subdivision.
•Supreme Court remand required focused air‑quality/health analysis; county consultants explained methodology and uncertainty.
•Unions urged board to use reserves or employer contribution to mitigate cost.

Decisions

•Appeal honored; two‑parcel split approved.
•Board certified the final EIR and adopted findings and MMRP (vote 4‑1).
•Board expressed consensus to direct CAO to secure outside construction management capacity.
•No open‑session policy change; closed‑session work ongoing.
•Proclamations approved by voice vote; retirement plaque presented

Directions

•CAO to continue closed‑session work with bargaining units and provide employees sufficient open‑enrollment information.
•CAO to pursue additional construction‑management support and continue close coordination with Public Works.
•County staff to implement mitigation measures and mitigation monitoring plan; applicant to proceed with conditions, infrastructure commitments and indemnification obligations.
•Record and process two‑parcel subdivision per county procedures.

Oct

Video

Full Fresno County Board of Supervisors meeting including a prolonged discussion and public comment on water contamination and funding options for Waterworks District 40, a proclamation recognizing Domestic Violence Awareness Month, retirement and service recognitions, approval of a county MOU with the Fresno County Fire Protection District, updates on solid-waste exclusive service area agreements, health-insurance plan changes for 2027, and a retirement-fund status report.

Discussion Points

•Board discussed concerns from volunteer chiefs and clarified MOU provides legal framework and sustainable funding while preserving volunteer fundraising.
•Board must decide whether curbside cleanup remains part of ESAP agreements and where to pilot/expand it; rural and mountain areas present different operational realities.
•County self-funded plan $15M over projection; spouse-connected claims and GLP drugs drove recent utilization.
•Market valuation nearing or exceeding 100% and actuarial smoothing spreads gains over five years.
•MOU responds to AP Triton review with expanded chief responsibilities and community brigade support; includes $1.46M appropriation from committed fund balance.
•Open enrollment Oct. 19–Nov. 6; outreach planned.
•Options considered: bottled water, engineering/treatment planning, pay down unpaid water charges ($100,000 would cover ~0.667 water debt), pay sewer debt to reduce $26.63 monthly sewer repayment portion.
•Plan design changes and vendor shifts reduce an estimated 37% rate pressure to ~21%.
•Proposals would strengthen reporting, standardize services, and add programs such as compost giveaways and battery collection.
•Residents reported long-term health concerns and advisory notices; staff clarified notices are compliance advisories, not a formal state "do not drink" order.
•Retirement contributions may modestly decline (forecast ~2%) next year, improving county budget predictability.
•System serves ~70 water and 69 sewer connections; contamination includes gross alpha, uranium, iron and manganese; DWR funds ~$500,000 expire Feb 2027; state provides $38/month subsidy; feasibility study funded with state technical assistance (~$254,000).

Decisions

•Board approved allocation of $100,000 from Supervisor Magsig's district funds and directed staff to return with a proposal.
•Board approved both recommended actions and authorized the chairman to execute the MOU.
•Board approved staff recommendation for plan design changes and schedule.
•Board directed staff to gather proposals for the urban core, include curbside and cleanup options, and return in spring 2027.
•Receiving report; no formal vote required.

Directions

•Approve MOU and budget resolution; proceed with implementation and reporting.
•Continue regular reporting and maintain actuarial oversight.
•Direct staff to solicit proposals targeting the urban unincorporated core with options for curbside and community cleanup and to leave rural/mountain agreements largely unchanged; return with proposed 10‑year agreements and base rates by spring 2027.
•Proceed with the plan redesigns, vendor changes for GLP medications, and open-enrollment schedule; HR to continue negotiations on county contributions.
•Staff to return with a proposal for using $100,000 in district funds focused on sewer relief and evaluate options that minimize jeopardizing state subsidy eligibility.

Sep

Fresno County Board of Supervisors Meeting 9/22/2026

Fresno County Board of Supervisors met Sept. 22, 2026; the board approved routine consent items, recognized retirees and community programs, adopted a branding approach keeping the legacy seal as the formal seal while approving a new logo for day-to-day use, approved several personnel and fee changes, denied a land-division variance appeal, approved a rezoning for a Mid Valley Disposal facility amid neighborhood concerns, and heard extended public testimony about contaminated drinking water in Shaver Springs and staffing changes in public health nursing.

Discussion Points

•Applicant argued vandalism and fire damage created unique circumstances; supervisors and staff concluded required variance findings not met.
•Applicant said city water will be used and a recycled-water truck wash will be installed; site will include storm pond and road improvements.
•Board members said they were not previously aware and requested follow-up with CEO and county management.
•Communications staff presented community and employee feedback supporting a modern logo.
•County partners highlighted program reach and registration/donation channels.
•Nurses said reassignments were done without seniority and with insufficient transition time, posing patient-safety risks.
•Planning Commission previously denied the variance unanimously and the board defers to that decision.
•Program evolved to include post‑crisis followup and embedded officers; staff emphasized safety protocols and training.
•Residents presented sample videos and reports of discolored water and alleged health impacts.
•Residents raised concerns about truck traffic, water usage, drainage and air quality.
•Some supervisors favored preserving the legacy seal for legal/ceremonial continuity.
•Staff proposed a seal-and-logo ordinance to define authorized uses and prohibit political misuse.
•Supervisor Chavez introduced the proclamation and described local philanthropic support.
•Supervisor Magsik said he sampled wells and tanks and detected iron and sulfur odors; county will supply lab results and follow up.
•Supervisors asked about any injuries to behavioral-health staff; staff said none reported to date.

Decisions

•Adopt mitigated negative declaration and approve rezoning to M‑1 with added conditions.
•Adopt recommendation 1A (legacy seal for legal use and new logo for branding) and approve seal-and-logo ordinance.
•Board approved agreement with City of Fresno and exception to competitive bidding.
•Board approved the proclamation unanimously.
•Board to request staff follow-up; no immediate policy reversal recorded in open session.
•Commitment to follow-up testing and briefing; no immediate remediation action recorded in transcript.
•Deny the appeal and uphold Planning Commission decision.

Directions

•Behavioral Health to return with performance metrics, including crisis-call counts, referrals and linkage rates.
•County Administrative Office to issue a branding guide and lead phased implementation.
•County CEO and Public Health to review reassignment process with labor representatives and provide briefings to the board.
•County partners to continue outreach; staff provided donation link.
•County staff to coordinate sampling with Department of Drinking Water and report results to board and public.
•Require indemnification agreement from applicant; ensure mitigation measures in permit conditions.

Sep

Video

Fresno County Board of Supervisors met Sept. 22, 2026; the board approved consent items, proclaimed Dolly Parton Day and recognized retirees and community groups, approved a behavioral-health collaboration with the Fresno Police Department, adopted a seal/logo policy keeping the legacy seal while approving a new marketing logo and an ordinance regulating seal use, heard several land-use items (one variance appeal denied; one rezoning/mitigated negative declaration approved), and received extended public comment on contaminated water in Shaver Springs and concerns about nurse reassignments.

Discussion Points

•Agreement includes post‑crisis follow‑up and embedded metrics
•Applicant described use of city water, recycled water for truck wash and planned road improvements
•Balance modernization with historical identity
•County sampling and flushing is underway; lab results pending
•Importance of 4‑H programming for youth development
•Need to ensure safety of behavioral‑health staff when responding without law enforcement
•Neighbors asked for more study on truck traffic, water sourcing and drainage
•Nurses warned about patient‑safety risks from rapid reassignments
•Planning Commission had been unable to make required findings
•Practical rollout to replace materials through normal business operations
•Residents reported taste/discoloration and alleged contaminants including iron, manganese, gross alpha/uranium
•Scope and impact of Imagination Library locally (15,000 books mailed)
•Supervisors acknowledged the concerns and will refer the issue to the CAO for follow‑up
•Whether ordinance findings were met given vandalism/fire damage to the residence

Decisions

•Adopted mitigated negative declaration and approved rezoning with conditions
•Adopt recommendation 1A; adopt ordinance establishing logo/seal standards
•Agreement approved; board directed quarterly metric reporting
•Deny appeal and uphold commission
•Proclamation adopted; staff will continue to support program partnerships

Directions

•CAO and county management to review reassignment process and provide information to the board
•Continue partnership with Fresno PD and contracted mobile crisis provider
•County staff to continue sampling and share lab results
•Include indemnification condition; ensure road improvements and water hookups per city requirements
•Issue branding guide
•Phase in logo use as materials are replaced
•Provide donation/registration link and continue local partnerships
•Provide public updates and consider Title 22 testing if warranted
•Staff to implement metrics and report back

Sep

Video

Fresno County Board of Supervisors held public budget hearings on the recommended fiscal year 2026–27 budget, hearing a county administrative overview and department presentations covering revenue assumptions, staffing changes, program impacts and capital projects; the board adopted the final budget unanimously.

Discussion Points

•$10M reduction in department appropriations; 16 positions proposed for elimination; jail medical cost increases.
•$1.6M reduction to SYTF funding from new state formula; need to use reserves for FY 202627 and worry about 2027.
•CAO described narrower revenue margins and one-time funding uses; departments presented program-level impacts and staffing pressures.
•County information exchange beta tests and youth suicide prevention phase are underway.
•Need to implement individual service-level reporting and to track HR1/Medi-Cal eligibility changes.
•Vacancy levels (prosecutors ~10% vacancy; public defender 23 open positions; sheriff and correctional officer vacancies) and implications for service delivery.

Decisions

•Board adopted the FY 202627 final budget by unanimous voice vote.

Directions

•Behavioral Health to track HR1 impacts daily and use reinvestment funds as contingency.
•CAO to supply contract/state funding breakout pages; departments to monitor vacancies and return with midyear updates if needed.
•Departments to monitor HR1 and Medi-Cal implementation and return with midyear requests if necessary.
•Probation will use reserves to stabilize and return with operational impacts or midyear adjustments if necessary.
•Public Health to proceed with redesign and track jail medical costs; coordinate with CAO on midyear impacts.

Sep

2026 Fresno County District 3 Community Budget Meeting | Supervisor Luis Chavez

Fresno County Supervisor Luis Chavez hosted a virtual budget town hall where county leaders reviewed how federal HR 1 changes, flat revenue growth and rising costs could affect local services and the draft $5.48 billion county budget; presenters answered questions about Medi-Cal, indigent care and planned road projects.

Discussion Points

•$3 million contract awarded for Malaga work; preconstruction mid-September; Chestnut intersection design grant obtained.
•Callaway full-street rebuild with over three miles of sidewalks planned.
•County estimates for indigent care cost range widely depending on enrollment shifts.
•County estimates significant increases in demand for indigent care and county behavioral-health services.
•County is evaluating local revenue options including Measure A; county will hold public hearings Sept. 14\u000215.
•Draft county budget is approx. $5.48 billion and faces pressure from rising costs and slowing revenue growth.
•Federally qualified health centers can provide regular care to undocumented residents with alternative funding.
•Hospitals must provide emergency care to all residents.
•HR1 introduces work requirements and reduces certain Medi-Cal eligibilities starting Oct 2026 and Jan 2027.
•Indigent care is not insurance; it covers emergency and narrowly defined care.
•Jail handles medical care, mental-health services and coroner responsibilities countywide.
•Sheriff\u0002s office budget ~ $400M/year and jail medical contract > $40M are major county expenditures.
•Undocumented individuals can apply for emergency (limited-scope) Medi-Cal and use BenefitsCal or in-person assistance.

Directions

•County Administrative Office will post materials and collect public input via survey and hearings.
•County will post clinic listings and application instructions; hospitals can assist with emergency Medi-Cal applications.
•County will provide outreach, BenefitsCal guidance and links; staff will coordinate communications across departments.
•Public Health will coordinate outreach and clarify eligibility and application processes.
•Public invited to ask questions following the presentation.
•Public meetings will be held coordinated by the supervisor's office; construction will be staged to minimize disruption.

Aug

August 26, 2026 - WWD40 Community Meeting

Fresno County supervisors and county water staff held a community meeting in Shaver Springs to address residents' concerns about Waterworks District 40's water quality, recent rate increases and the district's finances. County staff outlined grants, a retroactive $38/month O&M subsidy, a state-funded feasibility study due in November, and next steps for sampling, tank inspections and potential treatment or new wells.

Discussion Points

•A state-funded feasibility study (GHD) will evaluate alternatives—treatment, new well development or purchasing a private well—expected to complete in November.
•County acknowledged internal tank inspections had not been performed regularly due to cost and access and said it will pursue DWR funds for inspections and cleaning.
•County cautioned that O&M costs for treatment systems can be high and could materially increase bills for the small customer base.
•County explained bill components: base water $85.54/month and base sewer $110.99/month, plus usage charges.
•County explained hard-rock hydrogeology and that the contract included deeper drilling, hydro studies and bid preparation costs.
•County received an executed O&M subsidy agreement from the state's Division of Financial Assistance that is retroactive to July 2025 and provides about $38/month to water bills.
•County stated sampling was directed by the Division of Drinking Water and included wells, inside tanks and the farthest distribution point.
•Engineers will assess byproduct disposal and operational needs; county will return with recommendations after the study's completion in November.
•Feasibility study will evaluate ion exchange, reverse osmosis and other treatment alternatives as requested by the CAC.
•Feasibility study will recommend whether to drill again, buy an existing well or pursue treatment.
•If past-due collections accelerate, the county may re-evaluate rates earlier than five years.
•Rate study was conducted by an independent contractor and used local usage data; county staff said repayment of a negative account is amortized over five years.
•Remaining DWR funds may be used for bottled water delivery and tank inspections through February of the grant period.
•Resident questioned why test wells were sited near contaminated wells and cost approximately $700,000.
•Residents raised that organics/VOC testing may not be performed due to a waiver; county said testing scope and notice language are set by the state.

Aug

Fresno County Board of Supervisors Meeting 8/25/2026

At its Aug. 25, 2026 meeting the Fresno County Board of Supervisors held first hearing on a proposed real-property fraud prevention notice, received a county fire protection study with recommendations, heard a lengthy appeal and public testimony on the Sunset Acres event venue (CUP), approved a Williamson Act cancellation for a Fowler annexation, and heard public pleas over water safety in Shaver Springs and requests for a 4‑way stop in Delray.

Discussion Points

•Applicant said lighting, noise mitigation and traffic plans were prepared and events stop by 10 p.m.; staff affirmed conditions.
•Board members asked about insurance impacts, liability for volunteers, and which items can be done administratively.
•Code enforcement confirmed an injunction filed June 13, 2024 and ongoing court mediation; staff said revocation is an available remedy.
•David Fleck described mechanics: third‑party contact deposit, notary verification, thumbprint entry in notary journal, and disbursement procedures through verified accounts.
•Item will not itself annex the property; annexation and subdivision require further action.
•Multiple residents testified in favor and opposed; opponents cited repeated noise, bright lights, alleged harassment and code violations.
•Recommendations include a county fire emergency services chief, consolidated agreements, volunteer standards, regional training, and NFPA benchmark adaptation.
•Report shows county has complex mix of fire providers including volunteers, CAL FIRE and special districts.
•Residents requested inspections, testing records, and interim potable water supply where needed.
•Speakers cited 21 collisions in 12 years and at least one fatality, and asked for adoption of a resolution to install a 4‑way stop.
•Speakers cited government records describing uranium/gross alpha exceedances, contaminated wells, and deteriorated tanks.
•Staff clarified the notice is voluntary, not a lien, and standard recording fees apply.
•Staff previously found the intersection did not meet criteria in 2025; residents argued the underlying data were incomplete or outdated.
•Staff reported that the five findings for cancellation could be made.
•Supervisor Mendez described PAPA and said over 4,500 people signed current email alerts.

Decisions

•Board approved CUP 3778 and variance 4158 with conditions; unanimous vote.
•Board approved petition unanimously.
•First hearing conducted; second hearing scheduled.
•No immediate installation; staff follow-up requested.
•Public comment recorded; staff follow-up requested.
•Receive and file the report; request staff follow-up.

Directions

•Add indemnification and community water system conditions.
•Approve cancellation petition; staff to proceed if applicant pursues annexation.
•Approve CUP and variance with conditions; staff to monitor and if validated complaints occur, bring revocation back to the board.
•Designate county counsel to prepare summary and post notice for second hearing.
•Direct CEO and fire chief to return with implementation options and an updated agreement.
•Prioritize training, insurance review and volunteer program support.
•Set second hearing for 2026‑09‑08.
•Staff to coordinate with relevant agencies and report back; no immediate emergency declaration taken during public comment.
•Staff to review submitted petition, collision data and traffic engineering analysis and report back on feasibility under county criteria.

Aug

Video

Fresno County Board of Supervisors heard a package of land‑use and public‑safety items Aug. 25, 2026, including a proposed ordinance to help prevent deed fraud, a countywide fire protection study, a contested appeal over the Sunset Acres event venue (approved with conditions), Williamson Act cancellation for a parcel near Fowler, and multiple public safety and water quality pleas from residents.

Discussion Points

•Advocates urged the board to adopt a resolution and direct traffic engineering to install a 4‑way stop under county ordinance.
•Applicant and counsel presented mitigation measures (lighting, speaker orientation, noise monitoring, 10pm cutoff).
•Consultant David Fleck explained requested identity checks (not a lien) and verification steps to be taken by a qualified title company and vetted notary.
•Many neighbors described repeated unpermitted events, noise, light intrusion, alleged harassment and frequent sheriff calls; code enforcement and county counsel reported injunction and ongoing litigation/mediation.
•Paul Dictos described an existing Property Owners Protection Alert and said the ordinance would provide a voluntary, low‑cost prevention tool.
•Planning staff stated they could make required findings with mitigation and conditions; staff recommended approval.
•Report finds Fresno County is operationally complex and recommends benchmarks and phased performance goals.
•Residents cited at least 21 collisions in 12 years and multiple fatalities; they said temporary measures are insufficient.
•Residents noted tanks described as 'deteriorated beyond repair' in state records and asked the county to use emergency authority.
•Short‑term strategies include establishing a county fire/emergency services chief and consolidated agreements; mid‑term and longer recommendations cover volunteer recruitment, regional training and standards adoption.
•Speakers cited historical records of contamination (uranium, gross alpha) and compliance orders; asked for inspections, testing and interim bottled water.
•Staff confirmed findings for cancellation and advised the board of the parcel size and purpose (annexation and residential subdivision).

Decisions

•Appeal granted; CUP and variance approved with conditions; unanimous vote to approve.
•Petition approved.

Directions

•Board approved appeal with staff‑recommended conditions plus indemnification and community water system conditions; directed staff to monitor validated complaints and to bring revocation back before the board if conditions are violated.
•Board gave general direction to staff and the fire chief to return with implementation proposals and to prioritize foundational training and compliance elements.
•Board set second hearing for Sept. 8, 2026 and directed County Counsel to prepare a fair and adequate summary under Government Code section 25124(b)(1).
•Public comment requested staff follow‑up; no formal board action recorded at the meeting.
•Residents requested county staff to inspect storage tanks, review state compliance records, and provide interim safe drinking water where needed.

Aug

Video

The Fresno County Board of Supervisors received staff reports on a proposed county transportation tax measure (Measure C), debated whether to place the initiative on the November 2026 ballot or consolidate it with March 7, 2028, and voted to direct county counsel to file suit challenging Assembly Bill 19 23. The board also addressed solid‑waste hauler contracts, approved an EMT training fee change, heard public comment on employee health‑care costs and foster‑care oversight, and honored retiring Sergeant Edward Mayo.

Discussion Points

•Board deliberated on honoring petition signers vs. complying with elections law and implementation needs.
•Fee increase responds to higher operating costs.
•Haulers requested long‑term agreements (industry standard ~10 years) to amortize investments.
•Initiative provides dedicated neighborhood road funding but reduces flexibility for regional projects.
•Item 51 would create a licensed FFA and designate the DSS director as CEO; timing is questioned while a state DSS audit is pending.
•Legal tension between AB 19 23 language and Elections Code deadlines; possible litigation risk.
•Signature sufficiency confirmed by County Clerk: >32,500 submitted, >23,000 certified as valid.
•SIP needed to resolve ambiguities; board staff to participate in development.
•Speakers asked whether county would pay licensing fees and meet staff‑to‑client ratios.
•Speakers described high out‑of‑pocket costs and the impact of potential ~30% premium increases.
•Staff raised concerns that current contracts lack enforcement 'teeth' and suggested a careful rewrite.
•Supervisor asked about conflict of interest; county counsel said no required recusal.
•Supervisors balanced hauler stability and county oversight requirements.
•Union representatives argued increases would worsen turnover and recruitment problems.

Decisions

•Board adopted direction to pursue a 10‑year rewrite with 60‑day return timeline; unanimous consent.
•Board directed counsel to file suit against the state and proponents (closed session) by 3–2 vote.
•Fee increase approved with one abstention.
•Motion to consolidate to March 7, 2028 passed 3–2.

Directions

•Board to consider the issue during benefit and budget discussions; no immediate vote taken.
•County Counsel to initiate litigation challenging AB 19 23 as directed by board.
•Item 51 removed; oversight committee requested to be consulted and audit findings reviewed before any future action.
•Public Health to implement revised fees and monitor program impacts.
•Staff to prepare ballot resolution and voter information materials for March 7, 2028.
•Staff to return in 60 days with a proposed 10‑year contract draft; if not achievable, staff to present a two‑year extension option.
•Staff to support SIP development and return with clarifications and tables on implementation risk.

Jul

Video

The Fresno County Board of Supervisors held its July 14, 2026 meeting. The board heard ceremonial proclamations and retirements, rejected an ordinance to authorize limited home-based commercial kitchens (MECO) after extended public comment, certified the June 2 primary election results, and voted to request a 30-day county analysis of a proposed countywide Transportation Improvement Act initiative.

Discussion Points

•Board congratulated election winners and unanimously moved to certify the results.
•Board members questioned ability to perform unannounced inspections (state law restricts them) and whether dine‑in or alcohol rules are clear.
•Clerk certified petition signatures meet statutory minimums and provided options to the board.
•County Clerk reported 184,000 ballots (35% turnout) and described two‑card ballot handling, manual tally expansion and tabulation reliability.
•Opponents and some supervisors urged a county fiscal/implementation study to address PCI thresholds, regional allocations, oversight and legal ambiguities.
•Proponents argued the initiative funds neighborhood streets, transit and safety projects over 30 years.
•Public Health presented a 66‑permit MECO pilot; enforcement will rely primarily on scheduled education visits and complaint‑driven follow‑ups.
•Supporters said MECO creates regulated pathways for entrepreneurs; opponents flagged parking, noise, neighborhood impacts and enforcement staffing shortfalls.

Decisions

•Board unanimously certified the June 2 primary results.
•Board voted 3–2 to request a county report on the initiative.
•Motion to adopt MECO ordinance failed (2‑yes, 3‑no).

Directions

•Clerk to prepare for anticipated larger tabulation workload for November and to consider lessons learned from June.
•County staff directed to prepare a report on the effects of the initiative (fiscal, planning, legal) within the statutory period.

Jul

City Council Special Meeting Minutes 2026-07-06

The Sanger City Council held a three-minute special meeting on July 6, 2026, approving a motion to consolidate the November 2026 mayoral and two district council races with the statewide general election; the meeting included routine procedural actions and no public comments.

Discussion Points

•Agenda approved by motion; no public forum comments were received.
•Item E-1 presented as a department report to consolidate local races with the statewide general election.

Decisions

•Agenda approved as posted.
•Approved consolidation of elections for Mayor and Council Members representing Districts 2 and 4 to Nov. 3, 2026.

Jun

Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes 2026-06-29

Sanger City Planning Commission held a special meeting on June 29, 2026, approving five land-use items including two tentative parcel map extensions, a restaurant ABC license, a monument-sign variance, and an extension for a battery energy storage system CUP. No public comment was received; three commissioners were absent.

Discussion Points

•Extension maintains existing CUP authority for BESS at the power plant address APN 332-042-71.
•Staff presented CUP 2026-01 and site address (1005 Academy Avenue).
•Staff presented the extension request and site details for TPM 2023-01.
•Staff presented the extension request for TPM 2023-02 at the Academy & California Ave intersection.
•Variance would increase allowed sign area from 35 to 75 square feet for APN 332-190-36.

Decisions

•CUP 2021-02 extension approved.
•CUP 2026-01 approved allowing Type 41 ABC license.
•Extension approved for TPM 2023-02.
•One-year extension granted for TPM 2023-01
•Variance approved; CEQA Class 11 exemption adopted.

Jun

June 25, 2026 Fresno County Virtual Town Hall Meeting

Virtual Fresno County town hall where county officials outlined county services, budget pressures and a proposal to consider a transient occupancy tax (TOT) for unincorporated areas; officials answered resident questions and pointed to a June 30 Board of Supervisors meeting where the proposal may be considered.

Discussion Points

•Approval path requires Board supermajority then voter majority.
•County estimate is ~$4.5M if matching 12% city rate.
•HR1 shifts potential indigent care costs to counties with a broad estimated range ($40M–$240M).
•Large share of county services funded by restricted state/federal dollars; only modest discretionary funds available.
•Rising construction and equipment costs and disaster-related unreimbursed expenses further stress the budget.
•TOT would apply only to short-term lodging in unincorporated areas and not to primary residences.

Decisions

•No formal Board decision on new revenue tools was recorded during this town hall.
•No formal decision recorded; Board consideration scheduled for June 30.

Directions

•Staff to present revenue option(s) including the TOT to the Board and collect public input ahead of the June 30 meeting.
•Staff to provide additional details to Board and public; hold needs assessment to guide spending priorities if the TOT is approved.

Jun

June 24, 2026 Fresno County Virtual Town Hall Meeting

Fresno County officials gave an overview of county services and rising fiscal pressures, and presented a proposal to consider a transient occupancy tax (TOT) on short-term lodging in unincorporated areas to generate an estimated $4.5 million annually. Officials outlined cost shifts from recent federal changes (HR 1) and department-level budget impacts affecting public safety, health services and social services.

Discussion Points

•County overview of services and fiscal pressures presented
•Staff will collect community feedback and polling to inform board action
•TOT proposed as a potential local revenue source for unincorporated areas

Directions

•Staff to share polling and community meeting feedback with the Board of Supervisors

Jun

City Council Regular Meeting 2026-06-18

The Sanger City Council held a special and regular meeting June 18, 2026. Key items: a closed-session labor-negotiations item with no reportable action, recognition of employees and student athletes, a public hearing on AB 2561 (annual vacancies report) with discussion of police staffing, and council adoption of the FY 2026–27 operating budget and capital improvements with small line-item increases.

Discussion Points

•A planning commissioner urged changes to commission structure to ensure quorum and more reliable meetings.
•Ceremonial recognition of an employee and a high school sports team.
•Council confirmed no public comment on these items.
•Council confirmed there were no public speakers during the public hearing.
•Council questioned discrepancies between website figures and budget-authorized FTEs.
•Police union described operational impacts and low morale tied to vacancies and long-term medical leaves.
•Resident thanked council for local road work and recognition.
•Staff presented five linked budget resolutions and noted minor formatting and two added funding items.
•Staff presented fund-level reports for housing authority and finance authority.
•Staff presented vacancies by bargaining unit and explained some positions were held open pending outsourcing decisions for wastewater.

Decisions

•Adopt the budget and associated resolutions as presented with noted changes.
•Council accepted the vacancies report; no immediate policy or budget change adopted.
•Housing Authority and Finance Authority items approved.
•No formal council action required; ceremonial only.

Directions

•Code enforcement to review vendor and yard-sale sign enforcement in District 2.
•HR to follow up with timetable for filling positions and recruitment updates.
•Proceed with contract execution and administrative accounting entries.
•Staff to provide sworn vs. non-sworn counts and correct website numbers.
•Staff to put planning commission restructure back on agenda for further consideration.
•Staff to update budget book and website to reflect the two additions and correct other formatting errors.

Jun

City Council Special Meeting Minutes 2026-06-18

Sanger City Council held a short special meeting June 18, 2026, that included a closed-session conference on labor negotiations under Government Code Section 54957.6; the council approved the posted agenda and the City Attorney reported no reportable action after closed session.

Discussion Points

•Council adjourned to closed session under Government Code Section 54957.6 to confer with labor negotiators; designated representatives listed were Shelline Bennett and Amanda Champion; employee organizations named on the agenda included multiple bargaining units.

Decisions

•Agenda approved as posted; City Attorney reported no reportable action following closed session.

Jun

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 2026-06-18

The Sanger City Council met June 18, 2026, approved its FY 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget and several consent items (including a PFAS class-action settlement and an extension of the School Resource Officer agreement), recognized Employee of the Year George Jasso and the Sanger High School Boys Volleyball Team, and completed routine recesses to related local agencies.

Discussion Points

•Agency sessions were brief and procedural with no public comment recorded.
•Ceremonial presentation of certificates recorded; no action items attached.
•Consent calendar included multiple routine financial and operational items.
•Item F-6 required a separate approval and recorded one abstention.
•No public comment recorded during the continued hearing.
•One unnamed member of the public spoke during the hearing.
•Recognition presented by council and chamber; no further action recorded.

Decisions

•All consent items approved; F-6 approved with one abstention.
•Budget formally adopted by unanimous vote.
•Ceremonial recognition only.
•Each agency item was approved as recorded in the minutes.
•Item G-1 approved unanimously.
•Recognition only.

Loading meetings…