The Foster Care Youth Task Force of Prince George's County reviewed a draft interim report, discussed data gaps and preliminary recommendations (including respite care, crisis beds, tracking out-of-home data and supports for older youth), and set a staff revision and a vote on the draft for Nov. 12.

Discussion Points

•Agreed to pursue DSS-provided data to fill gaps
•Agreement to collect written feedback and revise before Nov. 12 vote
•Confirmed extent of county data gaps and the need to standardize definitions
•DSS would need to approve or fund incentives
•Identification of data gaps and service gaps (respite, crisis beds)
•Members want to recruit/support resource homes and treatment foster homes for older youth
•Need for earlier school-based identification (elementary/middle school) to prevent later foster-care entry
•Presentation of draft interim report and analytical frameworks
•Proposal to match older youth with in-county foster parents and attach incentive rates
•Respite care and crisis beds are high-priority needs per DSS
•Transportation access shapes placement choices; providers aim for Metro-adjacent placements
•Transportation and program capacity affect placement choices
•YES Center lacks operating funds and needs funding strategy

Decisions

•Vote on the draft scheduled for Nov. 12 (to Council); internal task force vote to occur before Council submission

Directions

•Staff to incorporate education and transition funding concerns into the draft and follow up with providers
•Staff to research feasibility of in-county incentives and report options
•Staff to research service models (including respite as a therapeutic vs. caregiver-relief service) and report back
•Staff to review live and written comments and send a revised draft to members
•Staff to use DSS responses and other data to fill in missing county metrics before the Nov. 12 submission

Nov

Video

Prince George's County advisory group held an informational, virtual meeting without quorum to finalize a grant application and scoring rubric. Members debated adding bonus points for in-person presentations, raised legal questions about targeting minority-serving organizations, and sought clarity on the status and implications of Council Bill CB 93; staff will convene a special meeting to finalize the application and rubric.

Discussion Points

•Application backend can be created in about a day once approved
•Board indicated willingness to plan presentation sessions
•Board lacked quorum and could not vote
•Members asked staff to circulate application and rubric
•Members will reconvene in a special meeting to finalize awards
•Minimum time boards have given applicants is 90 days; realistic total process closer to 120 days
•Need for advertising and operationalization of presentations
•Public commenter requested presentation slot
•Whether bonus points targeted to minority-serving organizations could be discriminatory
•Whether CB 93 had been transmitted and signed
•Whether council could act if board missed recommendation deadline given removal of earlier language
•Whether to add presentation bonus points to rubric

Decisions

•Schedule special meeting (date TBD)

Directions

•Board members to review materials and email comments
•Seek formal legal review of rubric language
•Staff to circulate application/rubric and schedule special meeting
•Staff to clarify timeline and coordinate scheduling for special meeting
•Staff to coordinate potential presentation dates and outreach
•Staff to follow up on transmittal/signing status and any amendments to the bill text
•Staff to outline how presentations would be scheduled and advertised

Nov

Cannabis Reinvestment and Restoration Board

Informational meeting of a Prince George's County grant advisory board focused on the proposed cannabis restoration and reinvestment grant program; members discussed town‑hall outreach, the application/rubric (including proposed bonus points), legal questions about targeted incentives, CB 93 transmittal and deadlines, and planned a special meeting to finalize the application.

Discussion Points

•Board agreed to consider scheduling presentations and using town halls to solicit input.
•Confirmed dates for in‑person and virtual town halls.
•Consideration of offering presentation slots for applicants and linking a small bonus to presentations.
•Council‑set deadlines compress the standard 90‑day application window and technical assistance period.
•County counsel indicated point systems used as incentives are generally permissible if not mandatory.
•Members proposed allowing applicant presentations and awarding bonus points to applicants who present.
•MOCO STEM requested a presentation slot to describe programs.
•Staff capacity constraints may limit ability to coordinate presentations.
•Whether amended bill language removes the council’s authority to act if the board does not meet its deadline.
•Whether bonus points targeting minority‑serving organizations would be discriminatory.
•Whether CB 93 had been transmitted and signed by the county executive.

Decisions

•No change to rubric yet; proposal remains a suggestion pending counsel review.
•No final decision on bonus points; topic to be resolved at special meeting.
•No formal decision; counsel concluded current amended language does not support unilateral council action.
•No formal decisions — meeting informational due to lack of quorum; special meeting planned.
•No formal decision; staff will try to schedule presentations.

Directions

•Staff to circulate the application and rubric for further written feedback; schedule a special meeting to finalize rubric and award amounts.
•Staff to confirm transmittal/signature status, review the hearing record, and report any pending amendments.
•Staff to coordinate presentation logistics where possible; board will use outreach feedback ahead of the special meeting.
•Staff to explore logistics and capacity for presentation days and advertise the opportunity.
•Staff to obtain formal legal memo clarifying permissible bonus language.

Nov

Board of Appeals

Prince George's County Board of Appeals approved three property-variance requests on Nov. 4, 2026, each finding irregular lot shapes or existing conditions justified relief; the board also approved minutes from Oct. 21 and adjourned at 6:28 p.m.

Discussion Points

•Applicant argued lot irregularity and corner geometry justify relief; architect said addition averages to standard setback but a corner cut causes localized extension.
•Applicant described desire to enclose an existing deck to avoid mosquitoes; representative explained lot-coverage exceedance and accessory building height validation needed.
•Representative said lot irregularity and adjacency to woods create the need for variances; applicant confirmed civic-association approval.

Decisions

•Minutes approved 3–0; meeting adjourned at 6:28 p.m.
•Variance V48-26 approved 3–0; building permit and further agency review still required.
•Variance V49-26 approved 3–0; applicant must present board order before permits processed.
•Variance V52-26 approved 3–0; applicants must present board order for permits.

Nov

Board of Appeals

Prince George's County Council held a special meeting to consider appointing Marcel Emerson, CPA, as county auditor. Council approved the appointment 6–1–1 after a short debate that included objections about public notice and a possible conflict of interest; staff and legal counsel said the charter and rules allow the appointment with recusal safeguards.

Discussion Points

•Council discussed the urgency of filling the auditor post and the ability to handle conflicts through recusal.
•Council member Ivy objected to short notice and alleged a personal tie between Emerson and another council member.
•Ivy alleged Emerson had a friendship with another council member that could create a conflict.
•Ivy raised a procedural objection alleging inadequate notice under the Open Meetings Act.
•Legal counsel reported no legal prohibition to appointment by majority vote and outlined recusal/conflict guardrails.
•Members discussed that prior audits of nonprofits would not automatically disqualify an appointee.
•Other members requested evidence and legal counsel outlined recusal options.
•Raj described recusal and reassignment as procedures under the charter and professional rules.
•Raj summarized his legal memorandum and concluded no bar to appointment by majority vote.
•Staff presented confirmation letter for Marcel Emerson and noted charter requires five‑year appointed term.

Decisions

•Appoint Marcel Emerson as county auditor (motion carried 6–1–1).

Directions

•Rely on recusal and reassignment procedures if a specific conflict comes up.
•Staff and counsel to follow existing conflict‑of‑interest and recusal procedures when specific matters arise.

Prince George's County

Meetings

Foster Care 11-5-2026

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Video

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Cannabis Reinvestment and Restoration Board

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Board of Appeals

Discussion Points

Decisions

Board of Appeals

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Video

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Child Care Improvement Workgroup

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Zoning Hearing Examiner

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Zoning Hearing Examiner

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

County Council **Revised: CR-121-2026 and LTR 10272026b added**

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Video

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Domestic Violence Task Force 10-26-2026

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Committee of the Whole

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

County Council **Revised: CR-121-2026 added; LTR 10262026 removed**

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

District Council **Revised: DSP-2026-0013 added**

Discussion Points

Decisions

Video

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Foster Care 10-22-2026

Discussion Points

Video

Discussion Points

Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Government Operations and Fiscal Policy Committee

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

Foster Care 11-5-2026

Discussion Points

Decisions

Directions

County Council Revised: CR-121-2026 and LTR 10272026b added

County Council Revised: CR-121-2026 added; LTR 10262026 removed

District Council Revised: DSP-2026-0013 added

County Council Revised: CR-121-2026 and LTR 10272026b added

County Council Revised: CR-121-2026 added; LTR 10262026 removed

District Council Revised: DSP-2026-0013 added