St. Tammany Parish Planning Meeting November 10, 2026
The St. Tammany Parish Planning and Zoning Commission considered subdivision and right-of-way requests, including several postponements and approvals. The commission postponed a proposed 60-lot Oakmont Reserve plan for revisions after discussing buffers, recreational space and its commercial surroundings.
Discussion Points
•Commissioner Robert asked whether an intermittent stream crossed the access road and could affect access; staff said it did not.
•Commissioner Robert objected to the layout, not the lot sizes, and said the layout concerns aligned with staff comments.
•Commissioners raised concerns about nearby commercial and industrial activity, screening, access, neighborhood notification and whether residential development was a good fit at this site.
•Staff described the sole identified recreational amenity as a sidewalk wrapping around five lots and said the larger northern green-space area had limited access.
•Staff questioned the adequacy of narrow perimeter buffers, screening where drainage works may remove trees, and the usability of proposed green space.
•Staff said prior minor-subdivision processing made commission approval necessary.
•Staff said single-family homes are permitted in HC2 zoning, while noting the site has challenges.
•Staff said the revised plat and plans needed updates to address comments and markups issued Nov. 4, 2026.
•The applicant described the planned road widening as moving toward its property.
•The applicant said the conditional-use appeal could affect whether the resubdivision proceeds and how lots are configured.
•The applicant sought a waiver of construction requirements for an existing private servitude.
•The developer said it was modifying its proposal after staff shared concerns and an alternate concept.
•The earlier HC2 rezoning request for lot 41B1 had been dropped; the conditional-use appeal remained pending.
•The engineer said the applicant had reviewed the staff report and could comply.
Decisions
•The commission approved combining lots 1A and 2A into one lot.
•The commission approved final plat and construction plans subject to staff conditions.
•The commission approved the parcel split with waivers.
•The commission approved the right-of-way request subject to the attached resolution.
•The commission postponed the case for one month.
•The commission postponed the case for one month; it did not approve the concept plan.
•The commission postponed the resubdivision for two months.
Directions
•Approval was conditioned on the staff report, staff comments and items one through five listed in the report.
•The applicant was asked to study staff comments and return with a revised concept plan.
•The applicant was urged to carefully consider staff comments.
A Facebook Live Q&A featured District Attorney Colin Sims, Detective Brian Brown and a forensic laboratory representative discussing child-safety investigations, criminal justice funding, a proposed sales tax and the role of a local DNA lab. The participants urged voters to review information about a Dec. 12 vote; the transcript does not state the year.
Discussion Points
•A viewer asked why cases with what the viewer described as strong evidence were not resulting in offenders being removed from the street.
•Brown described online approaches targeting children and a recent undercover operation.
•Sims and the laboratory representative described the local lab’s value for investigation, testing and expert testimony.
•Sims argued that restricted tax revenues make it difficult to fund criminal justice services through the general fund.
•Sims described a proposed quarter-cent sales tax, cost estimates, expected revenue and a cluster-dedication oversight approach.
•Sims described the Special Victims Unit’s shared investigative capacity and cited felony caseload figures.
•Sims gave differing parish contribution figures at different points; the transcript does not reconcile them.
•Sims outlined potential effects of a reduction in parish funding, including possible staffing losses and effects on specialized services.
•Sims said evidence governs what prosecutors can bring to court and cited office refusal and conviction estimates.
•The participants discussed proposed collective criminal justice funding, without deciding the lab’s future funding.
•The representative said the lab had lost staff after a millage was not renewed in 2024 and an analyst retired.
•The speakers discussed a five-year request and the need for longer-term tax restructuring.
St. Tammany Parish Council Meeting November 5, 2026
Public commenters and local officials pressed the St. Tammany Parish Council over proposed 2027 budget cuts that could remove NAMI Southeast Louisiana from the Safe Haven campus and cut funding for the coroner's DNA lab and criminal-justice operations; the council postponed final action and set follow-up meetings.
Discussion Points
•Added helicopter service and electronic dashboard; new distance thresholds for air backup.
•Administration said NAMI is not a council line-item; lease negotiation lies with administration.
•Contract is non-subsidized and includes reporting obligations.
•Contract negotiated with Fire Chiefs Association and Quality Assurance Panel.
•Council can approve/reject an ordinance to adopt a negotiated lease but cannot negotiate lease terms directly.
•DA's office described risks to prosecution timelines and victim services.
•DNA lab accreditation depends on facility/equipment/personnel and losing accreditation would remove access to federal database and grant funding.
•Judges warned staff cuts would degrade court function and specialty courts.
•Public commenters described NAMI\u0002s services and warned eviction/closures would worsen crisis.
•Reserves estimated to last to mid-2027 under current burn rate.
•Sheriff said jail funding required tens of millions more to maintain current services.
Decisions
•Council agreed to support outreach for a public-safety tax measure.
•Council substituted corrected attachments and introduced the ordinance.
•Motion to postpone budget to Nov. 18 special meeting (postponed).
•No formal funding change adopted at meeting.
Directions
•Acadian to work with dispatch to install an electronic dashboard if contract adopted.
•Administration to continue discussions with NAMI board/CEO and propose options.
•Administration to continue preparing materials and council to support outreach for proposed tax.
•Administration to finalize ordinance language and substituted attachments for adoption.
•Coroner to provide additional details to council; administration to factor lab funding into budget deliberations.
•Council to review public input and prepare amendments it can legally adopt.
•Task force to study long-term tax/revenue options.
St. Tammany Parish Zoning Meeting November 4, 2026
This St. Tammany Parish Zoning Commission meeting recorded multiple rezoning and conditional-use hearings, including a contested manufactured-home overlay request in Pearl River that failed after repeated tied and split votes, and approvals for several other zoning requests and conditional uses.
Discussion Points
•Applicant argued CBF‑1 is compatible with adjacent wildlife‑management uses and would permit low‑intensity recreation.
•Applicant emphasized blight remediation, low traffic context (Albert Street) and interest in planting and maintaining landscaping; argued fence interior placement would expose plantings to damage from adjacent heavy equipment.
•Applicant emphasized detention ponds sized for 25% reduction in runoff; neighbors flagged drainage and compatibility with mostly S‑1 surrounding zones.
•Commissioners discussed frontage requirements and whether S‑1 could yield similar lot counts.
•Commissioners noted frontage and elevation as positive attributes.
•Developer emphasized historic building rehabilitation and claimed rezoning would reduce traffic vs existing allowed uses.
•Neighbors raised property-value, traffic and precedent concerns; petitioner argued overlay limited to 2 acres and needed for family caregiving.
•No opposition was recorded at the microphone for this item.
•Opponents cited bus traffic, parking, and safety impacts; HOA requested a traffic study and site‑management plan before any rezoning.
•Petitioner cited presence of 7 mobile homes nearby and family need to house elderly parents.
•Residents focused on drainage, scenic-overlay preservation and restrictive covenants.
•Staff flagged fence placement outside landscape buffer, missing irrigation plan, and an incorrect Manning's coefficient requiring drainage plan revision.
•Staff noted drainage coefficient discrepancy but described it as a minor difference (0.063).
•Staff noted parcel is not in a flood zone and is compatible with existing highway corridor.
Decisions
•Commission recommended rezoning to GC‑2; matter moves to parish council.
•Conditional‑use permit approved with waivers; applicant must resolve drainage calculation and administrative plan items prior to final permitting.
•MHO approved.
•Motion to approve carried.
•Motion to deny and motion to approve both failed; no rezoning approved; petitioner may appeal to parish council.
•Planning commission recommended rezoning to S‑2; subsequent planning reviews required.
•Rezoning to CBF‑1 denied.
Directions
•Applicant must return with detailed engineering and planning documents for concept review; DOTD driveway permit may be required for highway access.
•Applicant to submit revised drainage plan and coordinate landscape/irrigation details with staff; waivers granted for fence placement and irrigation pending administrative conditions.
•Approved rezoning allows petitioner to pursue permits and placement.
•Commission denied the request; HOA recommended further study before any future resubmission.
•If rezoned, development must still secure DOTD driveway permits and state facility approvals; planning commission will review detailed plans.
•Legal staff reviewed voting procedures and identified an alternate who voted in error; commission retallied and reconsidered.
St. Tammany Parish Budget Hearings: October 29, 2026 PART 2
Department directors presented 2027 budget requests and operational updates to the St. Tammany Parish Council, covering utilities, facilities, finance, procurement, grants, public information, human services, HR, the parish president's office, the CAO and council office; several presenters requested staffing or capital funding and answered council questions.
Discussion Points
•$100,000 placeholder for efficiency studies was proposed and then pulled for later reconsideration
•26,000 AP invoices annually; ~4,600 vendors
•AMI meter replacement planned starting 2028; per‑meter cost cited ~$400
•Budget: gross budget ~ $829,000 (0.24% of portfolio); 72% of salaries direct charge to grants
•Budget includes election costs and a vehicle request
•Budget request ~ $738,000 for 2027
•Capacity concerns if other entities are consolidated under PIO
•Council office supports polling location review and ADA compliance work
•Department serves ~3,500 low‑income households annually and expends ~$2.9M in grant funds each year
•Enterprise funding model (rates and capacity fees)
•Facilities manages 15 buildings and ~800,000 sq ft
•Federal lobbying contract (~$90,000) prompted questions about value
•Finance largely funded by cost allocation/shared services
•Goals: vendor self‑service, ACH/EFT, Munis modules for grants and utility billing
•HR has six staff and requested no new positions for 2027
•Interactive public‑works map in development to visualize work orders and progress
•Jail maintenance requires fingerprinted/cleared vendors and specialist contracts
•New law (HB 692) allows use of qualified group organizations for cooperative purchases
•Objective: fully implement online bidding and vendor self‑service by 2027
•Parish owns the Lehi Levy Board building; annual cost ~ $40,000–$50,000
•PIO reach ~92,000 followers; STPG TV programming and on‑demand views
St. Tammany Parish Budget Hearings: October 29, 2026 PART 1
St. Tammany Parish council held an informational special meeting to review 2027 departmental operating budgets, hearing presentations from Engineering, Public Works, Homeland Security & Emergency Preparedness, Technology and others; no formal votes were taken. Staff highlighted requests for new positions, grant funding, cybersecurity pressures and planned capital projects.
Discussion Points
•Archive digitization (~$60,000) would remove the last microfilm holdings and make records searchable.
•Broadband project lit ~1,496 homes this year and created a 10-gig backbone in the northern parish.
•Capital items: Covington Barn design moving to construction, larger fuel tanks, paving machine request and $500,000 for waterway debris removal.
•Department processes and metrics are being formalized; permit turnaround target is 15 working days.
•Engineering requested five new capital-division positions (2 engineers, 2 project managers, 1 support person).
•Grants: EMPG $79,197.28, CDC Cities Readiness Initiative ~ $30,000, plus other grants totaling roughly $223,000.
•Operational items: EOC location (510 E. Boston St.) and warehouse at 620 N. Tyler St.; coordination with Red Cross logistics for warehousing.
•Patching volume has increased substantially; department reported two critical patch cycles that required touching 105 network devices twice in a month.
•Policy work: temporary housing ordinance for post-disaster housing; burn-ban triggers tied to NWS fire-weather alerts.
•Public Works requested two additional positions (to 230 budgeted positions).
•Rising costs for tree removal; use of contractors and arborists for large trees.
•Utility relocation delays are a major cause of construction schedule variance and require interagency/state coordination.
Directions
•Department to provide updated contractor-performance and staffing detail to council staff for follow-up.
•Hill to work with council on phasing options and to provide quantification and recruitment timelines for requested positions.
•Technology to work with finance to resolve a SPIDA account shortfall and to return with options for funding penetration tests or reassigning personnel if needed.
•Worry to work with the administration and PIO to clarify evacuation roles for council members and to bring draft ordinances back for committee review when ready.
St. Tammany Parish Budget Hearings : October 28, 2026
St. Tammany Parish Council heard budget presentations from the Mosquito Abatement District, Environmental Services, Animal Services, Permits & Inspections, and Planning & Development; councilors questioned staffing, inspection targets, grants and a cooperative endeavor agreement that adds $500,000 for on‑site sewage inspections.
Discussion Points
•2027 target: 8,000 initial inspections per year south of the urban growth boundary (24,000 total over three years).
•CEA contribution of $500,000 per year from Mosquito Abatement to support inspections.
•Council suggested additional BAA hearing dates could drive faster compliance on code cases such as derelict boats and abandoned vehicles.
•District emphasized surveillance‑driven treatments, performance goals, and the dominance of insecticide costs in the budget.
•Presenter proposed clustering of taxing districts as a structural option; noted any clustering would require millage votes.
•Reported permit and inspection volumes; same‑day plan review when submittals are complete.
•Request for $550,000 for comprehensive sewer utility plan and SRF loan financing for receiving station.
•Request to appropriate fund balance for vouchers and a kennel HVAC replacement.
•Staffing vacancies and certification requirements drive travel and training costs.
•Studies and planning initiatives are posted online under Planning Initiatives.
•Voucher program credited with reducing intakes and surgeries and improving live release rates.
Directions
•Bremer will present appropriation requests and cost estimates to the finance committee later the same day.
•Brown will prepare a white paper summarizing the sewer study scope and deliverables and provide cost estimates for additional inspectors and ongoing staffing.
•Leblanc will work with software vendor to build and publish metrics showing process time vs. user cycle time.
•Leiner will evaluate adding hearing dates and producing public metrics for code enforcement outcomes.
St. Tammany Parish Special Council Meeting : October 28, 2026
St. Tammany Parish Council met for a short session to consider authorizing special counsel in an ongoing assessor-related lawsuit and to request the parish opioid task force pursue settlement funds for state-mandated obligations; the council approved entering executive session, adopted the special-counsel resolution, approved language asking agencies to apply to the opioid task force, and adjourned.
Discussion Points
•Assistant DA explained trial-court disqualification and appellate writ strategy.
•Chair and staff recommended process language requiring agencies to apply to the opioid committee.
•Chair announced time limits and speaker-card process.
•Council agreed to prepare special counsel in case the appellate court does not stay the trial-court ruling.
•Council amended and adopted the resolution to formalize the application and review process.
•Laughlin described meetings with the sheriff and chief medical officer and cited local detox activity.
•No substantive public comments on the record for the two adopted items.
•Staff recommended executive session for litigation details under cited statute.
Decisions
•Meeting procedures announced; meeting adjourned.
•Resolution C-7336 authorizing special counsel adopted.
•Resolution directing opioid task force to consider sheriff settlement funds and requiring agency applications adopted as amended.
Directions
•Staff to proceed with appellate writ and to prepare special-counsel procurement if needed.
•State-mandated agencies should submit requests to the opioid task force for consideration.
St. Tammany Parish Agenda Review Committee : October 28, 2026
Commissioner Temple presented the state Fortified Roof grant program and funding options; the council handled agenda review, a budget amendment for animal services HVAC, debated a resolution clarifying developer-provided plans in zoning hearings, received an economic development update on business recruitment and the Gulf South Commerce Park, then adjourned.
Discussion Points
•Administrative vs. legislative means to clarify nonbinding nature of developer plans
•Custom HVAC units lack standard make/model numbers; cost estimates rose
•Gulf South Commerce Park FAST site and recruitment efforts
•Housing and workforce alignment needed to support business attraction
•Insurance discounts and five-year recertification requirement
•Parish-level gap funding can preserve local awards
•Program mechanics: application, randomized drawing, payment to roofer
•Program scale and parish share (1,264 roofs in St. Tammany)
•Project wins and measured metric (investment, jobs, payroll)
•Requested $190,000 budget increase for project
•State building-code equivalency starting 2027 vs. full Fortified certification
•Use of packet language and staff reports to show proposed vs. zoning-allowed densities
•Whether the resolution's language could limit public comment
Decisions
•Refer resolution c-7369 to full council
Directions
•Administration to draft explanatory language for zoning/BOA packets
•Commissioner offered to share parish program details
St. Tammany Parish Infrastructure Committee : October 28, 2026
St. Tammany Parish council heard a Public Works presentation on the 2026 district capital budget, non-capital repairs under $100,000, drainage and waterway debris removal, and several sidewalk/turning-radius projects; a motion was called at the end but the motion text and full vote tally are not recorded in the transcript.
Discussion Points
•Andrews Drive and Lake Village sidewalk projects completed
•Approximately $3.3M completed on ~80 locations
•Budgeted $3.5M for under-$100k projects
•Chair called for a motion; motion text not recorded
•Council praise and statements that drainage boxes added safety
•Drainage maintenance scope and typical failures addressed
•Drainage spending (~$1.5M) and use of maintenance contracts
•How asphalt packages lower unit costs
•Scope of parish road network and retention ponds
•Status of district packages and which remain ongoing
•Turning-radius projects completed in Districts 7, 3 and 14
•Types of projects covered by non-cap program
•Voice vote solicited; only a single affirmative is recorded in transcript
St. Tammany Parish Finance Committee : October 28, 2026
Finance committee reviewed sales-tax receipts and projected fund balances, considered capital and operating amendments for coastal restoration and animal services, approved referrals of four budget amendments to the full council, and discussed an opioid-abatement allocation and an FTA transit award.
Discussion Points
•August collections for Sales Tax District 3 were approximately $6,800,000, ~5% above Aug 2025.
•Capital amendment #18 requests $188,010 for supplemental survey, geotech, design and permitting for Chifungka West Bank Marsh restoration.
•Capital amendment #19 requests $190,000 for Animal Services HVAC upgrade; total HVAC project budget $618,000 with $270,000 from Capital Outlay.
•Chair called for aye and referral approved by voice vote with no recorded opposition.
•Committee moved to refer amendments to full council and approved the referral by voice.
•Committee referred grants amendment to full council.
•FTA urban transportation award $3,767,485 for period 2026–2037 with local matches noted.
•Jury services revenues and expenditures increased by $55,000 to reflect updated collections and historical actuals.
•Motion to refer moved by Rick and seconded by Maureen.
•Net receipts projected at approximately $85,000,000 for 2026; parish-wide collections may approach $99,000,000.
•Operating amendment adds $100,000 to the spay/neuter voucher program to cover invoices through year‑end.
•Presentation cited a statutory change ("revised statute 13 30 49 b 1 b") making juror mileage equal to the state official rate (reported at 76¢/mile effective Aug. 1).
•Reports now include projected year-end and next-year opening fund balances; general fund revenues flattening, expenditures ~76% paid, ~12% encumbered.
•Staff cited inability to secure private property access on similar projects as the reason for increased scope and cost.
•Total project budget $428,681 funded by Go Mesa bond funds and residuals; estimated 12‑month timeline after approval.
•Transfer $1.5M opioid‑abatement funds to Safe Haven crisis receiving center for daily operations.
Podcast interview on economic development in St. Tammany Parish, covering recent investments, a proposed 0.25¢ sales tax for judicial services, tax incentives, and plans to prepare for statewide industrial growth.
Discussion Points
•Emphasis on preserving safety, health care and education as quality-of-life assets.
•Emphasized need for infrastructure, zoning and workforce readiness.
•Host raised claim that tax breaks to corporations are blamed for fiscal issues.
•Need to prepare infrastructure/workforce for state-level opportunities.
•No formal ballot date or ordinance language recorded in the interview.
•Office evaluates projects for zoning, utilities and community fit.
•Office favors projects with zoning, utilities, and traffic compatibility.
•Outreach aims to reduce misinformation and clarify what taxes would fund.
•Parish increasing outreach via podcasts and videos to educate residents.
•Proposal described as a 0.25¢ sales tax for five years to fund judicial/public-safety services.
•Recent projects generating investment and jobs.
•Richardson argued incentives are competitive and result in capital, payroll, and tax-base contributions.
St. Tammany Parish Budget Hearings : October 15, 2026 PART 1
St. Tammany Parish budget hearing featured presentations from COAST (council on aging), Stark, the parish library and coroner, and a parish finance overview; officials flagged growing demand for senior services, capital projects at the library, the coroner's DNA lab as essential, and a lack of municipal sales-tax reporting from the sheriff's office.
Discussion Points
•Annie explained the general fund minimum fund-balance policy is a cash-flow target to ensure monthly liquidity.
•COAST presented FY2026 service and budget statistics and noted increased demand and wait lists.
•Coroner described budget trimming and use of locum tenens to manage autopsy workload.
•Coroner presented caseload, autopsy and DNA-lab workload and urged preserving the lab to avoid state-lab delays.
•Council members voiced support and asked for more detail and potential coordination.
•Council pressed staff about the sheriff's office no longer providing a municipal distribution breakdown for Sales Tax District 3.
•Council questioned deferred inflows, unassigned fund balance and a 16% projected drop in state revenue sharing.
•Council requested wait-list breakdowns and percentage metrics for future packets to support millage outreach.
•Library presented capital budgets and projected timelines for Lacombe, Mandeville and Slidell.
•Stark outlined services, staffing levels and capital needs and said residential wait lists exist.
Directions
•COAST to provide council with detailed wait-list counts and percent unmet need by service.
•Council to review coroner fund transfers and legal-fee projections in upcoming budget discussions.
•Council to use additional data to inform renewal messaging for 2028.
•Finance to seek municipal reporting data directly and to attempt to negotiate with the sheriff's office or its incoming administration for complete distributions.
•Library to supply additional detail about deferred inflows and the use of unassigned funds as projects close.
•Staff to provide council with a list of municipalities that have and have not shared their distributions.
St. Tammany Parish Budget Hearings : October 15, 2026 PART 2
St. Tammany Parish budget hearing reviewed the proposed 2027 capital program including a $42.7M parishwide project request, district capital allocations, utilities and facilities projects, information-technology needs, and equipment priorities; councilmembers pressed staff for timelines, costs and metrics.
Discussion Points
•District capital request of ~$23.1M, PACER rankings piloted to rank roads objectively.
•Engineering staff presented a $42.7M parishwide capital request for 2027 and described the five‑year capital plan and phasing.
•Four utility projects proposed totaling ~$4.6M.
•Marlin and Moray bridge replacements prioritized because they provide the only access for residents.
•Munis deployment to include utility billing and further IT modernization work.
•NAS purchase ($70k) vs SAN ($1.2M/5yr) vs cloud alternatives.
•Proposal to buy asphalt paver ($450,000) and roller ($150,000) to pave gravel roads in-house.
•Regionalization and bulk treatment are part of the strategy for some aging package plants.
•Several drainage projects are feasibility studies requiring systemwide evaluation.
•VFDs and UPS replacements improve energy efficiency and emergency reliability.
•Windows assessment requested to determine full repair scope and costs.
Directions
•Facilities to estimate payback periods and occupancy/revenue impact for Towers Building.
•IT to provide backup/replication architecture and cost comparisons.
Parish President Mike Cooper announced the creation of the RESET Saint Tammany task force to review the parishs tax structure, efficiency and transparency; he linked the effort to a December sales-tax proposal and said membership lists and public meetings will be published soon.
Discussion Points
•Administration's rationale that about 21% of revenue comes from nonresidents.
•Establish a multi-stakeholder task force to review tax structure and government efficiency.
•Estimate that the increase would move St. Tammany Parish from rank ~56 to ~47 in statewide sales-tax rates.
•Expectation that recommendations may require legislative action in Baton Rouge.
•Lack of available parish transfers to the sheriff's office for jail operations.
•Past examples of consolidation (Mosquito Abatement District, library, coroner).
•Planned drawing of approximately $14.5 million from the general fund to cover jail shortfalls.
•Potential reductions in deputies and investigative capacity if funding is not stabilized.
•Proposed sales-tax increase of 0.25 cent on Dec. 12 ballot.
•Public meetings and transparency commitments for task force work.
•Public-safety cluster allows revenue-sharing among jail, DA, judiciary, coroner and DNA lab.
Directions
•Publish membership list and make meetings publicly available.
•Task force will examine consolidation and shared-service proposals.
St. Tammany Parish Special Council Meeting Budget Hearing October13, 2026
St. Tammany Parish Council held a special budget hearing focused on the proposed 2027 general fund, large reductions to judiciary and jail funding, and operating subsidies for the Safe Haven campus. Council members pressed administration for assumptions, contingency plans and alternatives ahead of a December funding vote.
Discussion Points
•Administration presented revenue sources and timing for ad valorem receipts.
•Administration pursuing MAC clinic, CRC and MAT clinic tenants; opioid funds being considered.
•Closing a building does not necessarily eliminate utilities, insurance and maintenance costs.
•Council asked for scenarios and to form a small working group to explore options.
•Council requested an assumptions list and department efficiency reports.
•Court ruling assigns certain jail costs to parish government.
•DA outlined staffing levels, caseloads, and potential consequences of proposed cuts.
•Judges described heavy caseloads and reliance on support staff and specialty courts.
•Judiciary urged temporary use of eligible opioid-settlement funds for staff.
•Safe Haven gross cost ~ $1.2M; net gap ~ $400k after rents.
•Sheriff documented $3.7M in unfunded obligations and increasing transfers from sheriff's budgets.
•Some tenants pay market rent; other spaces are subsidized auxiliary courthouse or nonprofit uses.
Directions
•Administration to provide a campus schematic, tenant timetables, and alternative financing options (ground leases, third-party operators).
•Administration to provide a succinct assumptions list and departmental efficiency documentation ahead of departmental hearings.
•Administration to provide recent appraisal and a written set of exit/lease options.
•Council to consider opioid-settlement assistance and schedule follow-up with judiciary for budget reconciliation.
•Council to schedule a jail-focused workshop with sheriff and administration to reconcile contracts and funding scenarios.
•DA to provide detail on what line items would be affected and possible mitigations; council to consider short-term funding options.
St. Tammany Parish Planning Meeting October 13, 2026
Planning & Zoning Commission reviewed multiple subdivision and concept-plan items, approved several minor subdivisions and a roundabout sculpture, advanced changes to the unified development code related to grading/fill and flood mapping, and denied two concept plans after extended public comment and debate.
Discussion Points
•Commission discussed detention pond sizing, second access and whether relocation triggers major amendment.
•Commissioners expressed safety concerns and the need for additional traffic/drainage analysis.
•Commissioners praised the submission and moved to approve.
•Developer highlighted lot reductions and buffer preservation; opponents raised PUD amendment and safety concerns.
•Developer said plan conforms to Amendment 17, includes detention and pedestrian connectivity; residents cited traffic, emergency response, and compatibility concerns.
•Jeff Shane said rezoning/conditional use matters are under appeal and a community meeting was scheduled.
•Neighbors raised concerns in one case; staff clarified mobile homes are not permitted without zoning overlay.
•Petitioner described design (pelican on pedestal) and working area; commissioner asked about sight lines.
•Petitioners cited pending appeals to parish council; staff read item details and prior postponements.
•Staff noted no objection subject to resolution.
•Staff outlined why waivers were requested and what items require later engineering review.
•Staff reported inspection and outstanding items; petitioner confirmed compliance.
•Staff summarized 0 net fill and grading limits; public commenter urged 'best available data' be referenced; staff said parish inundation model will be used.
Decisions
•Amendment to UDC approved.
•Approval granted subject to resolution.
•Concept plan denied
•Final plan approved
•Multiple minor subdivisions approved with waivers
•Postponements granted
Directions
•Approve with conditions; ensure engineering reviews and maintenance agreements are completed before permits.
•Denial; require traffic study and drainage analysis for future submittals.
•Developer must pursue PUD amendment and provide engineering justification for any design waivers before resubmission.
•Developer to complete items 1–4 and submit for engineering sign‑off before work orders.
•Postpone items; petitioners to return with updated materials.
•Staff and petitioner to finalize resolution and ensure sight line and safety compliance.
•Staff to apply the parish inundation model and require engineering at plan stage.
St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustments Meeting : October 6, 2026
The Saint Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment met Oct. 6 and heard multiple variance requests including boathouse and greenhouse cases; the board approved several variances with conditions, denied one front-yard request and rejected an after‑the‑fact greenhouse request after a split vote.
Discussion Points
•Applicant argued greenhouse is needed to protect a large number of fruit trees and seedlings.
•Applicant cited neighbor letters of no objection and construction history; board focused on hardship criteria for variances.
•Applicant said family wanted one walkway and one boathouse to reduce environmental impact and cost.
•Board members expressed frustration at repeat contractor enforcement issues, but favored remedy by requiring permits.
•Board noted accessory size limits (200 sq ft) and that the greenhouse exceeded that threshold; a building permit and compliance with side/rear setbacks are required.
•Board noted HOA approval and neighbor non‑objection were important factors.
•Legal counsel warned deed restrictions might not bind adjacent owners; board asked for permits and revised plans.
•Owners paid after‑the‑fact permit fees; contractor failed to procure permits.
•Representative explained the greenhouse is independent and small (about 84 sq ft).
•Scam warning regarding fraudulent invoices using public agenda information.
•Staff required sealed drainage and as‑built plans for approvals; an 8‑inch encroachment was raised by a neighbor letter and must be corrected.
•Training certificates due end of October; next meeting Nov. 4 at 2 p.m.
Decisions
•Front‑yard variance failed; three other variance requests approved with conditions.
•Minutes approved; meeting schedule and training reminders set.
•Motion to approve failed 2–2; no variance granted.
•Variance approved.
•Variance approved subject to deed restriction and required permits.
•Variances approved subject to final permitting.
Directions
•Applicant directed to work with Miss Lambert and parish staff on redesign, setbacks or building permits.
•Applicant to coordinate with staff for any future work and to document HOA approval in file.
•Applicant to record deed restriction and submit coastal use/Corps approvals and revised site plan to parish staff.
•Applicant to submit sealed drainage plan, as‑built plan and correct encroachment as condition of approvals.
•Members to complete required trainings by end of October and email certificates to staff.
•Owners must obtain building permit and submit revised plans to staff.
•Staff to verify permits are complete before allowing further work.
Slidell Fire Chief Chris Kaufman discussed Fire District 1 operations, the department's growth and accreditation, and urged St. Tammany Parish residents to vote for a proposed justice-system sales tax on Dec. 12, stressing public education, transparency and the risks if the measure fails.
Discussion Points
•Caution against sweeping governmental consolidation without due diligence.
•Chief supports a short, five-year measure to demonstrate transparency and accountability.
•Dispatch consolidation as a current FD1 operation.
•FD1 budget and call volume presented to justify infrastructure expansion.
•FD1 uses social media to explain spending and training.
•He emphasized the need for public education and transparency around the proposition.
•Kaufman described the Dec. 12 justice-system sales tax as essential to maintaining public-safety services.
•Kaufman links transparency to increased voter support.
•New Lakeshore Villages station expected to be completed and staffed in December.
•Sales tax brings revenue from nonresidents; FD1 used a parcel fee where sales tax was unavailable.
A Beyond the Ballot interview with Fire District 1 Chief Chris Kaufman on FD1 growth, a new Lakeshore Villages firehouse, department budget and call volume, and his push for voter education ahead of a December 12 justice-system tax proposition in St. Tammany Parish.
Discussion Points
•Construction of 10th firehouse at Lakeshore Villages; scheduled to open in December
•FD1 consolidated dispatch into a single center that other districts fund
•FD1 holds international accreditation and employs ~221 people
•FD1 operates ~$31,000,000 budget and responds to >10,000 calls annually
•He described the proposal as five years to allow accountability and possible renewal later
•Kaufman framed the Dec. 12 vote as critical for justice-system funding
•Kaufman recommended a review of exemptions and reassessment practices
•Kaufman warns against reckless, wholesale consolidation
•Parcel fees used as alternative revenue streams
•Public outreach should show taxpayers how funds are spent and translate ballot language
•Sales tax spreads burden more evenly than millage; some districts cannot use sales tax
•Social media influences voting behavior and perceptions
•Voluntary consolidations have occurred when operationally sensible