November 05, 2026, Advisory Committee for Persons with Disabilities Agenda November 5 2026. Minutes
The Advisory Committee for Persons with Disabilities met May 7, 2026, approved minutes, reviewed plans for the Special Education Awards and the committee's awards program timeline, recapped dances and the social club attendance, discussed outreach at city events, and heard city updates including a fireworks proposal for Mile Square Park.
Discussion Points
•Chair Borack will not attend; Kayla Gulino will present.
•Committee received event information for Memorial Day, Older Americans Month activities, Crawfish Festival, and waste/shredding event.
•Dance and Social Club attendance recaps.
•May 19 study session will discuss permitting residents to bring fireworks to Mile Square Park for the 250th anniversary (one-year proposal).
•Members suggested renaming the award in 2027, possibly honoring Phil Nisco.
•Motion to approve minutes moved and seconded; passed unanimously.
•Need for volunteer recruitment and email list to coordinate volunteers.
•Third annual awards presentation planned for June 2 at City Council meeting.
•Timeline confirmed for applications, submissions, committee review, and presentation.
Decisions
•Informational updates only; no committee action recorded.
•Kayla Gulino to present awards in Chair Borack\u0002s absence.
•Minutes approved 8-0.
•Next dance scheduled for June 5; Social Club next meets Sept. 4.
•Timeline set as noted; staff to collect renaming suggestions.
Directions
•Committee to create volunteer list and recruit additional volunteers.
•Committee to proceed with presentation on June 2.
•Members to send award name ideas to staff (Jenni Worsham).
Advisory Committee for Persons with Disabilities Agenda November 5 2026
The Fountain Valley Advisory Committee for Persons with Disabilities is scheduled to meet November 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. at The Center at Founders Village to review past events (awards, dances), ongoing programs (spotlight series, social club) and discuss an accessible-playground and other recreational programming; city staff will provide updates.
November 03, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Packet. Media
Fountain Valley City Council met Nov. 3, 2026; council moved through ceremonial items and a consent calendar, approved several procurement and ambulance-related contracts, received the planning department annual report, and heard multiple public comments urging a town hall on automatic license-plate-reader cameras and concerns about the Orange County Power Authority rollout.
Discussion Points
•Contract includes cancellation and billing time protections (no charge if canceled within five minutes; billing ends no later than 20 minutes after transfer of care).
•Council briefly discussed potential conflict abstention but item passed 5‑0.
The Fountain Valley City Council received staff reports and sought votes on routine finance reports, a 657-unit Magnolia development agreement ordinance, and several staffing and procurement items including a $429,591 hydro-excavation truck and ambulance procurement and billing contracts at its Nov. 3, 2026 meeting.
Discussion Points
•DA vests development rights for a two-phase, previously approved Precise Plan covering 657 units and 4,460 sq ft of commercial; DA preserves City discretion and references CEQA Addendum; includes a $750,000 fire protection payment split between the phases.
•Hydro-excavation truck would reduce contractor reliance, risk of utility damage, and improve safety; FY26/27 budget includes $430,000 from Water Utility Fund to Fleet account.
•Staff estimated savings of roughly $24,000 per year based on prior-year collections.
•Surge services addressed gaps when city ambulances are fully committed; 1,013 surge requests and 678 transports reported for Sept. 2025–Aug. 2026; proposal process produced a single responsive bidder and staff performed benchmarking to confirm competitiveness.
•The portfolio is managed with Chandler Asset Management, LAIF and PARS and reported market values and yields; staff said liquidity is adequate to meet upcoming obligations.
•The register summarizes payments made by the City between Oct. 8 and Oct. 21, 2026 totalling $3,321,785.56.
•Wittman was selected first in Santa Ana's competitive RFP process; Fountain Valley staff recommended using Santa Ana's cooperative contract under municipal code exceptions, which would lower the city’s billing fee from 4.25% to 3.75% of net collections.
Decisions
•Staff recommended Alternative No. 1: approve the Register of Demands.
•Staff recommended Alternative No.1: receive and file the Treasurer's Report.
•Staff recommended approval of the agreement and authorization for the City Manager to execute it and exercise up to two one-year extensions, subject to funding.
•Staff recommended approval of the agreement and City Manager authority to execute the contract.
October 20, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda. Media
Fountain Valley City Council met on 2026-10-20 for a regular meeting and study session covering a pension/OPEB actuarial update, a 70th‑anniversary events plan, Art on a Box and Citizens Academy recognitions, a public comment period focused on Flock ALPR cameras, a public hearing and approvals for the 16800 Magnolia mixed‑use project (development agreement and density bonus/affordable housing agreement), and budgeted personnel additions for public safety and risk management.
Discussion Points
•CalPERS FY25 return (11.6%) and effect on city's UAL
•Committee proposed events calendar includes contests, parade, VIP dinner, concerts and commemorations
•Council asked staff to refine selection criteria for '70 people for 70 years'
•Council confirmed $70,000 budget and asked for sponsorships and community partnerships
•Council did not take formal action at this meeting
•Council discussed recruiting laterals and long‑term budget projections
•Development agreement includes a $750,000 fire protection payment and a 10‑year term
•Estimated $1.1M annual personnel increase; $601,430 appropriation requested for current fiscal year remainder
•Funding via city water funds
•Multiple residents requested an open town hall about Flock ALPR cameras
•OPEB net liability and planned PARS contributions ($2M annually)
•Partnership with MWDOC and FV School District to feature student art
•Preliminary FY26 projection (14.8%) and estimate that UAL could drop to ~$39.4M
•Project includes 657 units and 78 low‑income units (15% of base units)
•Seven positions added to address staffing and workload
•Speakers described cameras as creating searchable movement records retained 30 days and argued for independent oversight rather than internal audits
•State density‑bonus law (Gov. Code §65915) allows waivers/reductions and constrains local discretion
•Winner's artwork to be installed on utility box at Warner & Ward
Decisions
•Committee budget of $70,000 confirmed (as noted in presentation)
October 06, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Packet. Media
Study session and regular council meeting covering Civic Center Ad Hoc Committee update, PCTA funding and programming changes, public concerns about automated license‑plate readers (ALPRs/Flock), appointments to a new CARS advisory committee, Republic Services update, and a fire mutual‑aid reimbursement resolution.
Discussion Points
•Ad hoc committee tours of other municipal projects and Jamboree Housing example
•Bulky‑pickup program details and household hazardous‑waste options
•Calls for town hall and two‑way community conversation on Flock ALPRs
•Councilmembers recorded primary and alternate names to seat the committee
•Exploration of alternative language‑inclusive platforms
•Fleet electrification pilot
•Legal citations and concerns about retention and third‑party access to ALPR data
•Need to list eligible employee classifications to avoid reimbursement denial
•No personnel currently deployed
•Overview of Civic Center parcel and leases
•PEG revenue decline and budget projections
•Potential buyout cost for library lease (~$785,000)
•Preservation of core government meeting coverage and choice of discretionary productions
•Priority request for childcare roof replacement before winter
•Proposed vetting/approval process for production requests
•Public testimony from local business groups urging participation
•Recycling processing and polymer center in Las Vegas
•Requests for independent audits and public reporting of audits
•Resolution is administrative and does not change pay
Board of Supervisors Special Meeting - September 24, 2026
The Orange County Board of Supervisors held a special meeting to ratify the chairman's proclamation of a local emergency for coastal flooding tied to Hurricane Marie and the upcoming El Niño season, added language to broaden the resolution's scope, reviewed damage estimates and sand-dredging plans, and clarified anti-price-gouging rules and next steps.
Discussion Points
•Identified sand sources and logistics to replenish beaches and protect infrastructure.
•Initial damage estimates and the need for Cal OES guidance on incident treatment (single pattern vs. per-storm).
•Legal implications of emergency proclamation for anti-price-gouging protections and which governmental entity has authority to suspend statutes.
•Local outreach and materials distribution to canyon residents.
•Need to authorize county departments to act and avoid repeated proclamations if storms continue; whether to alter signed proclamation or change the board\u0002s resolution.
Decisions
•Board scheduled review on Nov. 17, 2026.
•Ratify chairman\u0002s proclamation and amend board resolution to broaden geographic language; set review date on Nov. 17, 2026.
Directions
•Add broadened language to the board resolution; staff to return or reconvene if needed and to brief on Cal OES guidance.
•Board may affirmatively extend statutory windows at future meeting if desired.
•Cal OES to host a call with local jurisdictions; staff to report back at next review.
•Resource fair on 2026-10-22 at Library of the Canyons; continued coordination with OC Waste & Recycling.
•Staff to coordinate with OC Water District, OC Public Works and federal offices to expedite dredging.
September 01, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda. Media
Fountain Valley City Council study session covered police recruitment and retention, a proposed Sister/Friendship City program and November delegation to Japan, and recommended design guidelines for a multi-city "Little Saigon" district; the council also heard a string of public comments about the Orange County Power Authority and police technology reviews and took first-reading action on procurement-threshold code changes.
Discussion Points
•Chief Heredia said the review was comprehensive (staffing/operations) and the report is complete; he was not aware of a conflict.
•Department authorized for 64 sworn; currently 56 (8 vacancies).
•Estimated delegation travel dates (Nov. 18–25) and costs; donor/kiwanis funds to cover most non‑staff delegate expenses; city share limited to up to $9,000 for three city representatives.
•Funding and implementation paths discussed: nonprofit + grants vs. BID (BID lacked support).
•Geography targeted north of Warner Avenue (Brookhurst, Euclid, New Hope, Harbor corridors).
•Guidelines cover streetscape/public realm, site design, architecture and signage; intended as voluntary, not zoning changes.
•HR/ESOP reduced hiring time from 6 to 3 months; incentives include $10,000 lateral/referral program.
•Public alleged Baker Tilly has business ties to Flock and requested disclosure and recusal for any ALPR/technology review.
•Raise direct purchase from $3,500 to $10,000; simplified acquisitions to $10,000–$100,000; codify IT purchasing authority.
•Staff affirmed changes do not jeopardize grant eligibility and will simplify procurement admin.
•Staff said the mailer is state‑prescribed and cannot be altered by OCPA and that OCPA will roll out green-rate discounts for low-income customers.
•State mailer comparing SCE and OCPA rates has drawn local criticism for clarity and for showing higher costs for some OCPA customer classes.
•Two recruits starting this month, two in October, remainder in January; aim to be near full by mid‑late next year.
•Two structuring options: DBA under Community Foundation (staff rec) vs. independent nonprofit.
Decisions
•Council supported option 1 (DBA under Fountain Valley Community Foundation) as recommended.
•First reading passed 5–0 and item advanced to second reading.
Directions
•Council gave staff direction to move forward with delegation planning and to identify council representation within about a week.
•Second reading scheduled for Sept. 15; staff to prepare administrative purchasing policy to reflect the changes.
•Staff and city attorney to check whether Baker Tilly disclosed Flock ties and to report back to council; consider carving out ALPR/technology evaluation if a conflict exists.
•Staff to monitor OCPA program rollouts and communicate lower-rate guarantees/expectations to council.
•Staff to provide detailed per‑recruit cost figures (pay during academy + tuition) and data on attrition/turnover.
•Staff to report back on incentive program payouts and options to increase incentives for lateral hires.
•Staff to return with clearer rate comparisons for Fountain Valley households, and to explain opt-out procedures and timing for enrollment.
•Staff to return with examples of implementation models and funding mechanisms and to continue coordination with partner cities and the emerging nonprofit.
•Staff to work with advisory committee and donors to finalize travel arrangements and budgets.
Robin Styler, Orange County Clerk of the Board, explains new electronic remote call-in registration and participation rules for Board of Supervisors meetings, including how to register, call-in requirements, speaking time, interpretation options, and how to submit comments by email.
Discussion Points
•How to register and where to find the portal; requirement to call from the registered telephone number; speaking time limits and mic behavior; registration timing and opportunity counts; deadlines for speaker request forms; language interpretation policy; email submission for public record.
Robin Styler, Orange County Clerk of the Board, explains new in-person speaker registration kiosks, timing limits, and language-translation features to make it easier for residents to participate in Board of Supervisors meetings.
Discussion Points
•Interpretation selection during registration; translations displayed on video screen; translations may not appear until sentence completion; no languages or staffing details provided.
•New electronic registration replaces paper slips; kiosks and mobile registration available; staff assistance provided; in-person participants called first; three minutes per occasion; three opportunities to speak; registration opens one hour before meeting; forms must be submitted before listed agenda thresholds; language interpretation available.
•Register at kiosks or online; staff assistance; approach podium in order called; state name and city; prepare two versions of remarks.
Robin Styler, Orange County Clerk of the Board, explains new electronic call‑in and registration procedures that let residents register to speak remotely, the timing and order for callers, time limits, interpretation options, and how to submit written comments to the public record.
Discussion Points
•Callers may have a person join to interpret and will receive double time.
•County does not provide interpretation for remote callers.
•Deadlines for speaker request form submission.
•Emailed comments become part of the public record and are distributed to Board members.
•How to register via county website and the register button.
•New electronic participation features and how to use them.
•Options for written comments and interpretation.
•Phone number entry and consequences of invalid/blocked numbers.
•Registration portal timing and speaker order.
•Time limits and automated prompts for remote callers.
Directions
•Contact Clerk's office for accommodation questions.
•Register early; call from the number you provided; contact facilitator or Clerk's office for help.
•Submit comments by email prior to the start of the meeting for inclusion.
•Visit the county website for registration; contact Clerk's office for assistance.
Orange County Clerk Robin Styler explains a new electronic speaker-registration system for Board of Supervisors meetings, replacing paper slips with kiosks and online forms; registration opens one hour before meetings and speakers get three minutes per turn.
Discussion Points
•Elimination of paper speaker slips; kiosks and online form available
•New electronic registration options for in-person and remote participants
•Procedural rules: order, podium approach, stating name and city, time limits
Directions
•Register online or at kiosks starting one hour before meetings; staff will assist at kiosks
July 14, 2026, Regular City Council Meeting Agenda. Media
Fountain Valley City Council met July 14, 2026. Council heard a hazardous-materials preparedness briefing from the fire department, reviewed allowable uses for a low- and moderate-income housing asset fund, adopted a fire development impact fee and a kratom ordinance, approved several contracts, and received a mid-cycle budget update.
Discussion Points
•ADU proportionality and the need to revisit fees after the standards‑of‑cover study.
•City previously reported 27% to ELI; state requires additional allocation until compliance met, creating an immediate $246,000 shortfall.
•Competitive RFP process produced 15 responsive proposals; TPA recommended based on experience and advocacy capacity.
•Consultant estimated $48M replacement value and cost per call ≈ $4,900.
•Council members voiced concern about cost; staff cited ADA risk and related facility modernization triggers.
•Four allowable use categories outlined: admin/monitoring; homelessness prevention; housing development/preservation; transfers to regional trust.
•High bid totals driven by prevailing wage, required fixture counts and demolition/back‑to‑studs scope.
•Inspection schedule: annual life‑safety inspections and three‑year hazmat audits tied to CERS/SIRS.
•Legal counsel advised local action is permissible absent state preemption.
•Operational posture: all firefighters trained to hazmat first‑responder operational level; regional type‑1 hazmat teams via joint powers agreement provide technician support.
•Ordinance targets synthetic/high‑potency formulations and requires age limits and child‑resistant packaging.
•Police undercover buys found kratom on display at multiple local smoke shops.
•Presence of 168 permitted hazmat sites in the city and top five hazardous facilities identified.
•Public concern about OCPA pricing compared with SCE and governance of the authority.
•Public privacy concerns about ALPR/Flock systems and potential centralization of location data.
•Staff identified carrying funds in the FY26‑27 budget and noted competitive bidding (22 bids received).
•System‑plan method and calls‑for‑service underpin fee allocations.
•TPA claims $2.2M secured previously and $3.5M pending for Fountain Valley applications.
Decisions
•Contract approved 5–0 with $72,000 annual not‑to‑exceed retainer.
•Contract awarded 5–0; construction to begin summer 2026 with completion targeted winter 2026–27.
•Ordinance adopted 5–0 on first reading; fee schedule adopted as presented.
•Ordinance introduced/adopted on first reading 4–1; second reading to follow.
Directions
•Council expects to reexamine fees once standards‑of‑cover study results are available.
•Council member Grandes to report back on his OCPA board activity and representation discussion.
•Proceed with awarded contract and manage schedule to minimize program disruption.
•Public Works to monitor costs and report on construction progress and budget changes.
•Staff to provide annual reporting on impact fee collections and progress on CIP projects funded by fees.
•Staff to provide clearer notation in the annual report about legacy home‑loan programs and to return with options for allocations and potential buy‑down pilots.
•Staff to request pricing calendars and key dates from OCPA and to share with council.
•Staff to return with the ordinance for second reading and recommended enforcement/implementation steps.
•Standards‑of‑cover/community risk assessment to be completed and returned to council; possible future recommendations on station siting, staffing and capital.
•TPA to provide monthly grants memos, meet with departmental leads and begin prioritized submissions.
June 30, 2026, City Council Special Meeting. Media
Special Fountain Valley City Council meeting to revisit the police towing services RFP after public comments from incumbent Best Towing and a detailed presentation from city staff and police on the procurement and facility inspections.
Discussion Points
•Council debated procedural and timing concerns, unverified bribery allegations, and whether to ask staff to extend the incumbent contract while investigations occur.
•Police chief described specific inspection findings that reduced departmental confidence in incumbent Best Towing.
•Smith presented RFP process and outcome; public commenters argued Best Towing met requirements and protested scoring and radius calculations.
Decisions
•No formal vote or change to the reported RFP award during the study session.
Directions
•Staff/legal to advise whether allegations merit referral to the district attorney.
•Staff to review allegations raised at the meeting and, if warranted, prepare an agendized report for council consideration.
Orange County Board of Supervisors held a June 23, 2026 meeting with presentations recognizing Elder Abuse Awareness Day and Gun Violence Awareness Month, adopted the FY 2026–27 budget amid debate over reentry funding and workforce provisions, advanced numerous contracts and continued consideration of the Dana Point Harbor hotel leases.
Discussion Points
•Advocates called for OCHCA to pursue continuation funding from CDPH and to present a plan at the next board meeting.
•Presentation of gun lock and buyback programs as prevention strategies.
•Public calls for transparent treatment of Black Infant Health funding and reentry center outreach to Santa Ana residents; detailed Q&A on AB109 allocation restrictions
•Public documented spraying near trails; existing DPR notices are limited to agencies and annual notifications.
•Public opposition noted late posting of voluminous lease attachments; developers urged timeliness tied to financing and Olympics schedule.
•Public Works to weigh employee safety and potential need for site security when notices could attract demonstrations.
•Recognition of elder‑abuse prevalence and promotion of APS hotline.
•Speakers demanded transparent accounting of prior and projected program expenditures.
•Supervisors requested worker transition protections and slip‑rate stabilization language.
Decisions
•Board unanimously directed Public Works to draft notice policy.
•Budget S‑94W adopted with amendments adding HRA contribution and directing follow-up reporting.
•Item continued to next available meeting.
Directions
•Develop a public‑facing notice regimen (product, purpose, general area, date range, contact) and return with recommendations and safety/cost analysis.
•Integrate the Gun Lock Program into Health Care Agency injury‑prevention services.
•Staff to meet with Breastfeed LA, 1st 5 OC and program partners and report back with options to secure funding and avoid disruption.
•Staff to return with vacancy list and quarterly updates; county counsel to ensure policy language includes $20,000 HRA contribution; staff to coordinate with CCP for any AB109 reallocation requests.
•Staff to review developer redlines and produce specific lease changes addressing worker transition and slip‑rate stabilization prior to next hearing.
The Orange County Board reported unanimous approvals in closed session of multiple settlements, including a $22.65 million package resolving claims from the October 2024 airport fire and other individual settlements. Copies of finalized agreements will be available through the countys risk-management offices or County Counsel.
Discussion Points
•Legal basis for closed session cited (Government Code sections 54957 (subd. (b)), 54957.6 and 54956.9).
•Readout of approvals for SES7 (workers' compensation), SES8 (airport fire pre-litigation claims), Nicholson settlements, and Abusheide acceptance.
Decisions
•Unanimous approval reported for SES7, SES8, Nicholson settlements, and Abusheide settlement.
Directions
•When finalized, copies of the settlement agreements will be made available through the Office of CEO Risk Management/Office of Risk Management and County Counsel.
Orange County Board of Supervisors held a public budget hearing on June 9, 2026; staff presented a $10.5 billion recommended budget and the board heard extensive public comment focused on returning $3.7 million recovered from a former supervisor to District 1, preserving GRIP youth programs, and a petition to phase out routine herbicide use in county waterways.
Discussion Points
•Agricultural Commissioner and Public Works described ongoing investigations and technical constraints; estimated cost increase for non‑chemical management could be substantial.
•Board emphasized need for regulatory coordination and pilot data before systemwide changes.
•Community groups say BIH is evidence‑based and that the county’s stated reason for not renewing funding (enrollment) does not reflect the program’s implementation‑year status.
•Extensive public testimony about creek vegetation loss and potential health risks from herbicide applications.
•Public commenters argued recovered COVID‑era discretionary funds were intended for District 1 and should be restored.
•Public comments overwhelmingly urged returning recovered $3.7M to District 1 and preserving GRIP program funding.
•Speakers warned that losing BIH could disqualify the county from larger state perinatal equity funding opportunities.
•Staff presented $10.5B recommended budget and described use of $75M one‑time funds to balance FY26‑27.
•Supervisors asked staff to verify who was harmed and whether prior district boundaries affect distribution.
•Supervisors debated program reductions, Sheriff equipment purchases, and OIR structure.
Decisions
•Board approved direction to staff to implement pilot studies and continue technical work; final policy to be based on evidence and regulatory review.
•Board took direction to staff; final appropriation deferred.
•No final funding decision at the June 9 meeting; staff to report back.
•Straw vote taken to move recommended actions forward; motion carried 4‑1 (direction only).
Directions
•Board requested an OCHCA briefing and additional oversight/explanation.
•Proceed with pilot studies; continue third‑party review and coordination with state/federal regulators; report back on costs and performance.
•Staff to incorporate public comments and budget changes and return final budget for vote at the next meeting (two weeks).
•Staff to prepare accounting and a reinvestment plan and return at next meeting.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors unanimously ratified a proclamation of local emergency for the May 22, 2026 Garden Grove hazardous-material incident, after public commenters urged clearer technical communication and county staff and first responders described the health risks, evacuation decision-making and next steps for reimbursement and cleanup.
Discussion Points
•Dr. CK emphasized MMA health risks in vapor form and said decisions prioritized preventing fatalities.
•Michelle Anderson explained FEMA Category B reimbursement limits (approx. 75%) and noted individual assistance is not covered by that federal category.
•OCFA described response efforts focused on preventing a BLEVE, cooling the tank, and monitoring temperatures before shrinking evacuation zones.
•Public commenters criticized official messaging and lack of early translated materials; staff and supervisors acknowledged gaps in language access and shelter capacity.
Decisions
•Board ratified the local emergency proclamation unanimously and set review for June 23, 2026, and every 60 days thereafter.
Directions
•County staff to press the potentially responsible company to establish an individual claims process and to coordinate cost recovery documentation.
•Submit initial damage estimates into WebEOC by June 3 for Cal OES/FEMA recovery meetings.
Orange County Board of Supervisors meeting on 2026-05-19 covered ceremonial recognitions (CSAC graduates, Drowning Prevention Month, EMS Week), a unanimous approval of a roadside memorial & safety-sign pilot after emotional family testimony, selection of vendors for the county's coordinated entry system (PATH selected amid debate), approval of a Behavioral Health Services Act integrated plan, a contested loan increase for a Homekey housing project, and large public comment pushes for MECO home-kitchen permits and complaints about herbicide spraying that prompted a heated board exchange.
Discussion Points
•Board confirmed pilot would not materially impact sidewalks/roadway and would be administratively managed.
•Director Kelly said the state template constrains the plan's format; contract-level outcomes will be required in implementing procurements.
•Environmental advocates said blanket herbicide spraying harmed waterways and residents and requested stronger IPM and accountability.
•Family testimony described the circumstances of Madden\u0002s death and argued signage could deter impaired driving.
•Friendship Shelter and United Way warned that changing providers during an active evaluation could disrupt services and harm families.
•Kelly explained that BHSA housing dollars have limits and the county has sought state flexibility.
•Public commenters urged MECO adoption as an economic opportunity and urged regulation to improve food safety and inclusion for immigrants and women.
•Significant unforeseen costs (roof replacement, water service upgrades) were discovered during demolition; developer deferred fees and sought other resources.
•Staff explained Homekey timing constraints and loan structuring (amortization of a portion), and the developer described attempts to find other funding.
•Staff explained RFP scoring breakdowns and comfort with transition plans.
•Supervisor Foley explained staff had worked with family and OC Public Works to craft a policy.
•Supervisor Foley questioned housing targets, calculation of subsidy amounts, and how outcomes will be measured.
•Supervisors debated continuity vs. objective procurement results and the value of having alternates to mitigate risk.
•Supervisors disagreed over proper process and whether unilateral pause directives by an individual supervisor are appropriate for countywide practices.
•Supervisors questioned developer due diligence and whether taxpayer funds should cover overruns.
Decisions
•Approve BHSA integrated plan subject to follow-up clarifications and contract-level performance measures.
•Approve PATH as primary respondent for A,B,C; designate alternates; instruct staff to negotiate.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors recognized Probation Services Week, heard more than a dozen public commenters—mostly about homelessness, CityNet services and jail conditions—debated an ordinance to change CalOptima board composition (sent to second reading after a 3-2 vote), reviewed communications and public-safety contracts and moved into closed session.
Discussion Points
•ACLU requested an independent civilian oversight board to investigate alleged abuse and misconduct.
•ACLU summarized report alleging excessive force, poor classification, lack of medical access and other issues; they reported five in‑custody deaths so far this year.
•Consent calendar item changes, agreement approvals, and the CalOptima ordinance amendment and scheduling.
•Last independent audit of radio system was circa 2002; governing board doing financial reconciliation.
•Multiple speakers questioned how CityNet contract areas were chosen and whether the contractor has produced outcomes proportional to funding.
•Probation Services Week proclamation accepted by department leadership.
•Residents described increased encampments, theft, sanitation concerns, and lack of consistent law‑enforcement response.
•Supervisor request to consider auditor‑controller or external audit to verify costs and sole‑source procurement.
•Supervisors highlighted increasing departmental responsibilities following state reforms (Prop 47, Prop 57, AB 109).
•Whether to act now or delay county ordinance because of pending SB 4 at the state level; transparency and oversight arguments for adding supervisors to CalOptima board; practical scheduling concerns about second reading and effective dates.
Decisions
•Amend ordinance with effective date 01/01/2018 and return for second reading.
•Approved Motorola agreement and requested follow‑up on reconciliation and audit options.
•Multiple consent items approved; CalOptima ordinance continued to second reading.
Directions
•County Counsel and County Executive staff to coordinate with legislators and prepare technical language and outreach to state delegation.
•County staff to request auditor‑controller capacity and report on reconciliation/outside audit possibility.
•Supervisors indicated staff follow‑up would be required to explain CityNet scope and metrics.
.jpg/1920px-Interstate_405_Through_Fountain_Valley_and_Westminster%2C_California_(6013793940).jpg)
